Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19

PLoS ONE

Home Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19

Nicholas Gray, Dominic Calleja, Alexander Wimbush, Enrique Miralles-Dolz, Ander Gray, Marco De Angelis, Elfriede Derrer-Merk, Bright Uchenna Oparaji, Vladimir Stepanov, Louis Clearkin, Scott Ferson

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247129, Volume: 16, Issue: 2, Pages: 1-1

Article Type: Correction Article History

Publisher: Public Library of Science

Altmetric

Table of Contents

Gray,Calleja,Wimbush,Miralles-Dolz,Gray,De Angelis,Derrer-Merk,Oparaji,Stepanov,Clearkin,and Ferson: Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19

The title of this article is incorrect. The correct title is: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. The correct citation is: Gray N, Calleja D, Wimbush A, Miralles-Dolz E, Gray A, De Angelis M, et al. (2020) Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775

Reference

NGray, DCalleja, AWimbush, EMiralles-Dolz, AGray, MDe Angelis, et al (2020) Is “no test is better than a bad test”? Impact of diagnostic uncertainty in mass testing on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775 10.1371/journal.pone.0240775