PLoS ONE
Home Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19
Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19
Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19

Article Type: correction Article History
Table of Contents
Gray,Calleja,Wimbush,Miralles-Dolz,Gray,De Angelis,Derrer-Merk,Oparaji,Stepanov,Clearkin,and Ferson: Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19

The title of this article is incorrect. The correct title is: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. The correct citation is: Gray N, Calleja D, Wimbush A, Miralles-Dolz E, Gray A, De Angelis M, et al. (2020) Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775

Reference

NGray, DCalleja, AWimbush, EMiralles-Dolz, AGray, MDe Angelis, et al (2020) Is “no test is better than a bad test”? Impact of diagnostic uncertainty in mass testing on the spread of COVID-19. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0240775 10.1371/journal.pone.0240775