Kidney International
Home Best practices for correctly identifying coronavirus by transmission electron microscopy
Best practices for correctly identifying coronavirus by transmission electron microscopy
Best practices for correctly identifying coronavirus by transmission electron microscopy

Article Type: review-article Article History
Table of Contents
Abstract

This guidance provides clear, concise strategies for identifying coronaviruses by transmission electron microscopy of ultrathin sections of tissues or infected tissue cultures. These include a description of virus morphology as well as cell organelles that can resemble viruses. Biochemical testing and caveats are discussed. Numerous references provide information for documentation and further study.

Keywords
Bullock,Goldsmith,and Miller: Best practices for correctly identifying coronavirus by transmission electron microscopy

Numerous articles have been published on the histology and ultrastructure of pathology in patients with coronavirus disease 2019, and in an attempt to account for tissue damage and disease pathology, the hunt by electron microscopy for actual virus particles has been extensive. However, coronaviruses are complex and can resemble normal subcellular organelles. Many investigators have been misled into attributing organ damage to the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 identified (incorrectly) by electron microscopy in the tissue, while the structures described have been simply normal subcellular organelles.

Description and discussion

The following proposed best practices for the identification of coronaviruses are offered to aid the investigator, who is not necessarily a virologist, in accurately recognizing or ruling out the existence of coronavirus. An extensive reference list is also provided to document the true appearance of coronaviruses and to demonstrate pitfalls of misidentification.

    (i)Coronaviruses (Figure 1 ) are enveloped viruses (as opposed to naked viruses) (i.e., they are surrounded by a covering derived from host membranes [with some viral proteins inserted]). They obtain this envelope by budding through the endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi apparatus. Thus, intracellular coronaviruses will be found inside larger vesicular/vacuolar structures and not as free single virions inside the cytoplasm.

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–infected Vero cell containing abundant viral particles held within intracellular vesicular/vacuolar structures (arrows). Bar = 1 μm. Inset: Higher magnification of intracellular SARS-CoV-2 particles with cross sections through the helical nucleocapsid visible as internal black dots. Bar = 200 nm. To optimize viewing of this image, please see the online version of this article at www.kidney-international.org.
    Figure 1

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–infected Vero cell containing abundant viral particles held within intracellular vesicular/vacuolar structures (arrows). Bar = 1 μm. Inset: Higher magnification of intracellular SARS-CoV-2 particles with cross sections through the helical nucleocapsid visible as internal black dots. Bar = 200 nm. To optimize viewing of this image, please see the online version of this article at www.kidney-international.org.

    (ii)Coronaviruses do have projections on the surface; however, in thin sections, the “spikes” on the outside are not always (indeed, not usually) clearly visible, unless specially stained (e.g., with tannic acid). They may or may not appear as a very short “fuzz.”

    (iii)Because intracellular coronaviruses are always grouped inside a vacuole formed by the endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi complex, if spikes are visible, they face the vacuolar contents, not the cell cytosol.

    (iv)Viruses that have been released to the extracellular space by exocytosis (fusion of the vacuole with the plasma membrane) have their spikes facing the extracellular space (outside the cell).

    (v)Coronaviruses have a helical nucleocapsid (like a coiled phone cord), and the helix is loosely curled up inside the viral envelope; when cut in cross section, it looks like small electron-dense dots (∼6–12 nm in diameter) inside the virus particle.

    (vi)Because of the soft pliable covering, coronavirus particles are not all the same size and vary from ∼60 to 140 nm in diameter. However, they are not in the ≥200-nm range like the large paramyxoviruses—a different family of viruses.

    (vii)Other vesicular and double-membrane structures are involved in virus production and can be seen in infected cells.

    (viii)Several common subcellular organelles can mimic coronavirus, the most obvious being clathrin- or coatomer-coated vesicles (Figure 2 a) and multivesicular bodies (Figure 2b), both involved in cell protein transport. Others include vesiculating rough endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi vesicles, lysosomes, and (extracellular) glycocalyceal bodies.

    Normal subcellular organelles mimicking coronavirus. (a) Clathrin-coated vesicle free in the cytoplasm of a cell (arrowhead) and nearby severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) particles inside intracellular vacuoles (arrows). Cross sections through the viral nucleocapsid are visible in the SARS-CoV-2 particles (small dots inside the virus). Bar = 200 nm. (b) Membrane bound collections of vesicles (arrows) making up multivesicular bodies (MVBs) within the cytoplasm. Bar = 500 nm. (c) Higher magnification of an MVB; note the absence of dots inside the vesicles corresponding to cross sections through the viral nucleocapsid. Bar = 200 nm. Figure 2b and c are courtesy of Dr. Ricardo Vancini. To optimize viewing of this image, please see the online version of this article at www.kidney-international.org.
    Figure 2

    Normal subcellular organelles mimicking coronavirus. (a) Clathrin-coated vesicle free in the cytoplasm of a cell (arrowhead) and nearby severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) particles inside intracellular vacuoles (arrows). Cross sections through the viral nucleocapsid are visible in the SARS-CoV-2 particles (small dots inside the virus). Bar = 200 nm. (b) Membrane bound collections of vesicles (arrows) making up multivesicular bodies (MVBs) within the cytoplasm. Bar = 500 nm. (c) Higher magnification of an MVB; note the absence of dots inside the vesicles corresponding to cross sections through the viral nucleocapsid. Bar = 200 nm. Figure 2b and c are courtesy of Dr. Ricardo Vancini. To optimize viewing of this image, please see the online version of this article at www.kidney-international.org.

Although a few authors have demonstrated coronaviruses directly in the lung,1, 2, 3, 4 numerous investigators have misinterpreted viral imposters to be coronaviruses5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 (though Su et al. have since modified their original description of coronaviruses to “virus-like particles” [personal communication, 2020]). Not all small round-to-ovoid things are viruses or even “virus-like.” Essential skills to recognize the presence of these agents, particularly enveloped ones, include (i) expertise in virus morphology (what they look like), (ii) knowledge of virus morphogenesis (how they are constructed), and (iii) knowledge of normal subcellular organelles that can resemble them. Even then, it may be difficult, based solely on appearance, to identify unequivocally the presence of coronaviruses versus look-alikes,21 , 22 particularly in tissue that is not well fixed (e.g., autopsy material). Care should be taken to educate oneself, not only on the appearance of viruses in general23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and coronaviruses specifically,6 , 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 but also on the potential pitfalls in mistaking round structures for infectious particles.6 , 23 , 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47

Furthermore, nucleic acid and antibody testing of bulk tissue does not conclusively prove the presence of infective coronavirus, nor does it document that the detected RNA or protein is in the organ parenchyma (as opposed to in the blood in the tissue); rather, it only shows that viral components are present, but not in which cells and not whether they are actually being assembled there. If morphological identification is equivocal, only by (i) viewing actual viral morphogenesis in the tissue, (ii) using immunoelectron microscopical staining or ultrastructural in situ hybridization of virus,48 , 49 or (iii) electron microscopical visualization of particles in situ in tissue where there is biochemical evidence of viral presence (e.g., on-the-slide-embedding37 , 50 , 51 of virus-labeled paraffin-embedded tissue sections that have been labeled for coronavirus by either immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization) can one conclusively determine that coronaviruses are growing in cells (as opposed to being simply present in circulating blood).

Summary

Intracellular coronaviruses are 60- to 140-nm round-to-ovoid particles, with dark 6- to 12-nm dots inside, and will be contained inside a vacuole; spikes (if visible) will touch the vacuolar contents, not the cell cytosol, and will not be as prominent as those on clathrin-coated vesicles. Extracellular virus particles, released through the plasma membrane by exocytosis, will cling to the cell surface and may be more likely to show surface projections, and the spikes will face the extracellular space. Thus, the ultrastructural findings in tissue described in many of the published articles do not confirm the presence of coronavirus directly in tissue and, when in doubt, investigators should consult an ultrastructural virologist or one of the virology authors listed.6 , 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 4 , 47, 48, 49

Disclosure

All the authors declared no competing interests.

References

    Martines R.B., Ritter J.M., Matkovic E.. Pathology and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 associated with fatal coronavirus disease, United States. Emerg Infect Dis26: 2020. 2005-2015

    Carsana L., Sonzogni A., Nasr A.. Pulmonary post-mortem findings in a series of COVID-19 cases from northern Italy: a two-centre descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis20: 2020. 1135-1140

    Falasca L., Nardacci R., Colombo D.. Postmortem findings in Italian patients with COVID-19—a descriptive full autopsy study of cases with and without comorbitities. J Infect Dis222: 2020. 1807-1815

    Dittmayer C., Meinhardt J., Radbruch H.. Why misinterpretation of electron micrographs in SARS-CoV-2-infected tissue goes viral. Lancet396: 2020. e64-e65

    Ackermann M., Verleden S.E., Kuehnel M.. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in Covid-19. N Engl J Med383: 2020. 120-128

    Ackermann M., Mentzer S.J., Jonigk D.. Pulmonary vascular pathology in Covid-19: reply. N Engl J Med383: 2020. 888-889

    Su H., Yang M., Wan C.. Renal histopathological analysis of 26 postmortem findings of patients with COVID-19 in China. Kidney Int98: 2020. 219-227

    Su H., Gao D., Yang H.-C.. The authors reply. Kidney Int98: 2020. 232-233

    Kissling S., Rotman S., Gerber C.. Collapsing glomerulopathy in a COVID-19 patient. Kidney Int98: 2020. 228-231

10 

    Farkash E.A., Wilson A.M., Jentzen J.M.. Ultrastructural evidence for direct renal infection with SARS-CoV-2. J Am Soc Nephrol31: 2020. 1683-1687

11 

    Varga Z., Flammer A.J., Steiger P.. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet395: 2020. 1417-1418

12 

    Wang Y., Shuhong L., Hongyang L.. SARS-CoV-2 infection of the liver directly contributes to hepatic impairment in patients with COVID-19. J Hepatol73: 2020. 807-816

13 

    Grimes Z., Bryce C., Sordillo E.M.. Fatal pulmonary thromboembolism in SARS-CoV-2-infection. Cardiovasc Pathol48: 2020. 107227

14 

    Colmenero I., Santonja C., Alonso-Riaño M.. SARS-CoV-2 endothelial infection causes COVID-19 chilblains: histopathological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of seven paediatric cases. Br J Dermatol183: 2020. 729-737

15 

    Bösmüller H., Traxler S., Bitzer M.. The evolution of pulmonary pathology in fatal COVID-19 disease: an autopsy study with clinical correlation. Virchows Arch477: 2020. 349-357

16 

    Menter T., Haslbauer J.D., Nienhold R.. Post-mortem examination of COVID-19 patients reveals diffuse alveolar damage with severe capillary congestion and variegated findings of lungs and other organs suggesting vascular dysfunction. Histopathology77: 2020. 198-209

17 

Qian Q, Fan L, Liu W, et al. Direct evidence of active SARS-CoV-2 replication in the intestine [e-pub ahead of print]. Clin Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa925. Accessed August 4, 2020.

18 

    Pesaresi M., Pirani F., Tagliabracci A.. SARS-CoV-2 identification in lungs, heart and kidney specimens by transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci24: 2020. 5186-5188

19 

    Bradley B.T., Maioli H., Johnston R.. Histopathology and ultrastructural findings of fatal COVID-19 infections in Washington State: a case series. Lancet396: 2020. 320-332

20 

    Paniz-Mondolfi A., Bryce C., Grimes Z.. Central nervous system involvement by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). J Med Virol92: 2020. 699-702

21 

    Werion A., Belkhir L., Perrot M.. SARS-CoV-2 causes a specific dysfunction of the kidney proximal tubule. Kidney Int98: 2020. 1296-1307

22 

    Hopfer H., Herzig M.C., Gosert R.. Hunting coronavirus by transmission electron microscopy—a guide to SARS-CoV-2-associated ultrastructural pathology in COVID-19 tissues. Histopatholgy78: 2021. 358-370

23 

    Doane F.W., Anderson N.Electron Microscopy in Diagnostic Virology: Practical Guide and Atlas1987. Cambridge University PressNew York, NY

24 

    Palmer E.L., Martin M.L.Electron Microscopy in Viral Diagnosis1988. CRC PressBoca Raton, FL

25 

    Miller S.E.. Detection and identification of viruses by electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc Tech4: 1986. 265-301

26 

    Miller S.E.Diagnosis of viral infection by electron microscopyLennette E.H., Lennette D.A., Lennette E.T.Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial and Chlamydial Infections1995. American Public Health AssociationWashington, DC35-76

27 

    Goldsmith C.S., Miller S.E.. Modern uses of electron microscopy for detection of viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev22: 2009. 552-563

28 

    Oshiro L.S., Schieble J.H., Lennette E.H.. Electron microscopic studies of coronavirus. J Gen Virol12: 1971. 161-168

29 

    Tooze S.A., Tooze J., Warren G.. Site of addition of N-acetyl-galactosamine to the E1 glycoprotein of mouse hepatitis virus-A59. Eur J Cell Biol33: 1984. 281-293

30 

    Gosert R., Kanjanahaluethai A., Egger D.. RNA replication of mouse hepatitis virus takes place at double-membrane vesicles. J Virol76: 2002. 3697-3708

31 

    Bonifacino J.S., Lippincott-Schwartz J.. Coat proteins: shaping membrane transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol4: 2003. 409-414

32 

    Fehr A.R., Perlman S.. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol Biol1282: 2015. 1-23

33 

    Ng M.-L., Tan S.-H., See E.-E.. Proliferative growth of SARS coronavirus in Vero E6 cells. J Gen Virol84: 2003. 3291-3303

34 

    Knoops K., Kikkert M., van den Worm S.H.E.. SARS-coronavirus replication is supported by a reticulovesicular network of modified endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol6: 2008. e226

35 

    Doyle N., Hawes P.C., Simpson J.. The porcine deltacoronavirus replication organelle comprises double-membrane vesicles and zippered endoplasmic reticulum with double-membrane spherules. Viruses11: 2019. 1030

36 

    Goldsmith C.S., Tatti K.M., Ksiazek T.G.. Ultrastructural characterization of SARS coronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis10: 2004. 320-326

37 

    Bullock H.A., Goldsmith C.S., Zaki S.R.. Difficulties in differentiating coronaviruses from subcellular structures in human tissues by electron microscopy [e-pub ahead of print]. Emerg Infect Dis. doi: 10.3201/eid2704.204337

38 

    Dalton A.J., Haguenau F.Ultrastructure of Animal Viruses and Bacteriophages: An Atlas1973. Academic PressNew York, NY

39 

    Miller S.E.. Problems and pitfalls in diagnostic electron microscopy. Proc Microsc Microanal18: 2012. 172-173

40 

    Calomeni E., Satoskar A., Ayoub I.. Multivesicular bodies mimicking SARS-CoV-2 in patients without COVID-19. Kidney Int98: 2020. 233-234

41 

    Miller S.E., Brealey J.K.. Visualization of putative coronavirus in kidney. Kidney Int98: 2020. 231-232

42 

    Goldsmith C.S., Miller S.E.. Caution in identifying coronaviruses by electron microscopy. J Am Soc Nephrol31: 2020. 2223-2224

43 

    Goldsmith C.S., Miller S.E., Martines R.B.. Electron microscopy of SARS-CoV-2: a challenging task. Lancet395: 2020. e99

44 

    Roufosse C., Curtis E., Moran L.. Electron microscopic investigations in COVID-19: not all crowns are coronas. Kidney Int98: 2020. 505-506

45 

    Smith K.D., Akilesh S., Alpers C.E., Nicosia R.F.. Am I a coronavirus?. Kidney Int98: 2020. 506-507

46 

    Ghadially F.N.Endocytotic vesicles and vacuolesGhadially FN, ed.: Ultrastructural Pathology of the Cell and Matrix3rd ed.1988. ButterworthLondon1134-1139

47 

    Kniss D.A.. Alternative interpretation to the findings reported in visualization of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 invading the human placenta using electron microscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol223: 2020. 785-786

48 

    Snijder E.J., Limpens R.W.A.L., de Wilde A.H.. A unifying structural and functional model of the coronavirus replication organelle: tracking down RNA synthesis. PLoS Biol18: 2020. e3000715

49 

    Cassol C.A., Gokden N., Larsen C.P., Bourne T.D.. Appearances can be deceiving—viral-like inclusions in COVID-19 negative renal biopsies by electron microscopy. Kidney3601: 2020. 824-828

50 

    Hayat M.Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy: Biological Applications4th ed.2000. Cambridge University PressCambridge, UK

51 

    Estrada J.C., Selim M.A., Miller S.E.TEM of tissue from paraffin-embedded H&E-stained 6-micron sections for viral diagnosis (an unusual papovavirus case)Price R., Kotula P., Marko M.Microscopy & MicroanalysisVol. 11: 2005. Cambridge University PressHonolulu, HI964CD

Acknowledgments

The authors received National Institutes of Health Instrumentation funding 1S10OD026776-01, “Transmission electron microscope (TEM).” We thank Natalie Thornburg, Azaibi Tamin, and Jennifer Harcourt for providing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2–infected Vero cell cultures. Additionally, we thank Dr. Ricardo Vancini for providing Figure 2b and c and Dr. David Howell for critically reviewing this manuscript.

The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.