NB and THW contributed equally.
To the editor:
The outcome of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) is significantly worse compared with the general population.1, 2, 3 Whether the SARS-CoV-2–specific immunity in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) receiving dialysis is impaired as a possible cause for the inferior outcome is not known so far.
We performed an observational case-control study comparing the frequencies and functionality of SARS-CoV-2–reactive T cells as well as antibody titers in 14 COVID-19 convalescent patients receiving HD with 14 age-, sex-, and COVID-19–presentation matched patients with normal renal function (Supplementary Table S1).
In general, the frequencies of SARS-CoV-2 spike, nucleocapsid, and membrane protein-reactive T cells in patients receiving HD and patients with normal renal function were similar (Table 1 ; Supplementary Figure S1A). Spike-specific antibody titers were also comparable in both groups (Supplementary Figure S1B). Frequencies of SARS-CoV-2–reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells producing effector cytokines granzyme B, interleukin-2, tumor necrosis factor, and interferon-γ were similar or, for certain cytokines, even significantly higher in patients receiving HD compared with patients with normal renal function (Table 1; Supplementary Figure S1C). Patients receiving dialysis demonstrated higher frequencies of memory SARS-CoV-2–reactive T cells (Supplementary Figure S2).

| Group, % | CD4+CD154+CD137+ | CD4+CD154+CD137+ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +Granzyme B+ | +IFN-γ+ | +IL-2+ | +TNF+ | ||
| Dialysis | 0.7745 (0.057–1.57) | 0.02029 (0–0.134) | 0.1538 (0.017–0.437) | 0.42 (0.054–0.651) | 0.282 (0.02–0.588) |
| Nondialysis | 0.237 (0.031–0.734) | 0 (0–0.025) | 0.0255 (0–0.195) | 0.1165 (0.023–0.3) | 0.0705 (0.012–0.223) |
| Group, % | CD8+CD137+ | CD8+CD137+ | |||
| +Granzyme B+ | +IFN-γ+ | +IL-2+ | +TNF+ | ||
| Dialysis | 0.355 (0.187–1.21) | 0.2795 (0.08–0.61) | 0.0225 (0–0.1665) | 0.0225 (0–0.096) | 0.085 (0–0.15) |
| Nondialysis | 0.1325 (0–0.33) | 0.0205 (0–0.107) | 0 (0–0.06) | 0 (0–0.018) | 0 (0–0.045) |
IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IL-2, interleukin-2; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Frequency of SARS-CoV-2–reactive CD4+ or CD8+ T cells among all CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Data are given as median (95% confidence interval).
To our knowledge, this exploratory study suggests for the first time that patients receiving dialysis are able to generate efficient T-cell immunity, as demonstrated by their multiple cytokine production. The magnitude and functionality of SARS-CoV-2–reactive T cells was comparable or even higher than in patients with normal renal function. Further larger studies are required to confirm our observation.
1
2
Supplementary Methods.:
Table S1.: Cohort characteristics.
Figure S1.: Frequency of SARS-CoV-2–reactive T cells. Isolated PBMCs from dialysis (n = 14) and nondialysis patients with normal renal function (n = 14) after a SARS-CoV-2 infection were stimulated for 16 hours with 1 μg/ml of SARS-CoV-2 OPPs from the M (n = 13/14), N (n = 13/14), or S (n = 14/14) protein. SARS-CoV-2–reactive T helper cells were identified as Life/Dead-Marker–CD3+CD4+CD137+CD154+, and SARS-CoV-2–reactive cytotoxic T cells were identified as Life/Dead-Marker–CD3+CD8+CD137+. (A) Frequencies of total SARS-CoV-2–reactive CD4+CD137+CD154+ and CD8+CD137+ T cells reactive to the M, N, or S protein combined are shown. (B) Comparison of the relative titers of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-protein–specific IgG antibodies of dialysis patients (n = 10) and nondialysis patients with normal renal function (n = 14), measured by ELISA and evaluated as the ratio to an internal control for samples with SARS-CoV-2–specific CD4+ T cells. (C) Identification of cytokine-expressing T cells reactive to the M, N, or S protein combined: expression of Th1 cytokines IFNγ, IL-2, or TNF and granzyme B among antigen-reactive CD4+CD137+CD154+ (upper panels) and CD8+CD137+ (lower panels) among all CD4+ or CD8+ cells, respectively. Groups were compared using a 2-sided, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. P values ≤ 0.05 were defined as significant and are marked by an asterisk.
Figure S2.: SARS-CoV-2–reactive memory T-cell phenotypes. Isolated PBMCs from dialysis (n = 14) and nondialysis patients with normal renal function as the control (n = 14) with SARS-CoV-2 infection were stimulated for 16 hours with 1 μg/ml of SARS-CoV-2 OPPs from the M (n = 13/14), N (n = 13/14), or S (n = 14/14) protein. Presented are frequencies directed against all proteins combined. (A) Identification of antigen-reactive memory T cells: After gating on SARS-CoV-2–reactive CD4+CD137+CD154+ and CD8+CD137+ T cells, memory cells were identified by the expression of CD45RA and CCR7 as naïve (CD45RA+CCR7+), central-memory (CM, CD45RA–CCR7+), effector-memory (EM, CD45RA–CCR7–), and TEMRA (CD45RA+CCR7–) cells. Comparison of overall SARS-CoV-2–reactive naïve and memory (B) CD4+CD137+CD154+ and (C) CD8+CD137+ T cells. (D) Distribution of naïve and memory SARS-CoV-2–memory T-cell populations. Groups were compared using a 2-sided, unpaired Mann–Whitney U test. P values ≤ 0.05 are marked by an asterisk.