PLoS ONE
Home Congenital Zika syndrome: A systematic review
Congenital Zika syndrome: A systematic review
Congenital Zika syndrome: A systematic review

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

¤a

Current address: National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

¤b

Current address: Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

Article Type: research-article Article History
Abstract

Background

The signs and symptoms of Zika virus infection are usually mild and self-limited. However, the disease has been linked to neurological complications such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and peripheral nerve involvement, and also to abortion and fetal deaths due to vertical transmission, resulting in various congenital malformations in newborns, including microcephaly. This review aimed to describe the o signs and symptoms that characterize the congenital Zika syndrome.

Methods and findings

A systematic review was performed with a protocol and described according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search strategy yielded 2,048 studies. After the exclusion of duplicates and application of inclusion criteria, 46 studies were included. The main signs and symptoms associated with the congenital Zika syndrome were microcephaly, parenchymal or cerebellar calcifications, ventriculomegaly, central nervous system hypoplasia or atrophy, arthrogryposis, ocular findings in the posterior and anterior segments, abnormal visual function and low birthweight for gestational age.

Conclusions

Zika virus infection during pregnancy can cause a series of changes in the growth and development of children, while impacting the healthcare system due to the severity of cases. Our findings outline the disease profile in newborns and infants and may contribute to the development and updating of more specific clinical protocols.

Freitas,Souza-Santos,Carvalho,Barros,Neves,Brasil,Wakimoto,and Fujioka: Congenital Zika syndrome: A systematic review

Introduction

Zika virus (ZIKV) is a flavivirus of the family Flaviviridae, isolated initially in non-human primates in Uganda (1947), and in humans (1954) in Nigeria, Africa [14].

The first recorded outbreak was on the Yap Islands of Micronesia in 2007, followed by an epidemic in French Polynesia in 2013 and 2014 [5]. In Brazil, the first cases of the disease were reported in May 2015 [6].

Compared to other arboviruses such as dengue and chikungunya, ZIKV infection involves additional transmission routes. Besides transmission by Aedes mosquitoes, the risk of ZIKV spread may even be greater because the virus can also be transmitted via sexual relations, blood transfusions, and vertical transmission, and ZIKV has also been detected in urine and saliva [711].

The laboratory diagnosis of ZIKV infection is limited by the high cost and cross-reaction with other flaviviruses [12,13], and then protocols for clinical diagnosis, in the context of simultaneous infection by other arboviruses, need to be implemented to define cases of ZIKV infection among pregnant women who have a rash [14].

Most individuals infected with the Zika virus either do not develop symptoms or have mild and self-limited signs [1517]. However, the disease has been linked to several neurologic manifestations in children and adults such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and peripheral nerve involvement, and ophthalmic complications such as retinal and optic nerve abnormalities. Vertical transmission has been associated with spontaneous abortion and stillbirth, and also with congenital malformations in newborns including but not limited to microcephaly [5,15,1833].

According to the Brazilian Information System on Live Births (SINASC), the prevalence of microcephaly from 2000 to 2014, prior to ZIKV circulation, was 5.5 per 100,000 live births. However, in 2015, with the introduction of the virus and the onset of the first cases of microcephaly, the prevalence rate increased to 54.6 per 100,000 live births, i.e., an increase of 9.8 times [34].

The emergency committee of the World Health Organization (WHO) declared Zika a Public Health Emergency of International Concern in February 2016. The emergence of a disease with potentially severe impact on pregnant women and newborns triggered the search for global partnerships and the joint efforts of governments and experts to describe the infection’s pathophysiology and deal with the related clinical and social challenges [35,36].

The association between ZIKV infection and cases of microcephaly was first reported in 2015 in Brazil [28]. Detection of ZIKA infection during pregnancy has been found to be harmful to the fetus and can lead to fetal death and other abnormalities in newborns [15,19,37].

Microcephaly is only one of the possible complications found in neonates exposed to ZIKV during pregnancy and comprising the congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) [28,3841]. There is sufficient evidence to support a causal link between ZIKV and congenital anomalies, at both the population and individual levels [38,4249].

The systematic reviews published to date have addressed causality, transplacental transmission of ZIKV, the effect of sexual transmission, and antibody-dependent enhancement of viral teratogenicity, a different approach from that of the present review [38,4249]. This review aimed to determine the signs and symptoms that characterize the congenital Zika syndrome and contribute to a more accurate and timely diagnosis.

Methods

Literature search

This review was performed with a protocol and described according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement [50] and is registrered in PROSPERO (CRD42020151754) in 27 October 2019. We used PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) as a search strategy tool as described in S1 Table.

A systematic search was conducted in Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Scopus databases, and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS) to identify studies assessing signs and symptoms associated with congenital Zika virus syndrome. Additionally, manual search was performed for bibliographic references of the selected articles and grey literature databases were also included to minimize publication bias [5155].

The search descriptors used for MEDLINE were as follows: “Zika or zikv” and “pregnan*” or “children or newborn or infant” and “congenital or congenital abnormalities” or “birth defects or malformations or microcephaly”. The search strategy was adapted according to the characteristics of each database. The complete search strategies used are presented in S3 Appendix.

There were no language restrictions in the database searches.

Selection

Article selection was performed by two authors independently (DAF and WB), and disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus. Studies were included if they reported data describing signs and symptoms of fetal growth impairment and altered development in children exposed to Zika virus during pregnancy, among laboratory-confirmed mothers and/or children < = 2 years old. First, the titles and abstracts retrieved by the search were read and excluded as follows: editorials, letters, guidelines, and reviews. Secondly, studies potentially eligible for inclusion were read in full text and the same inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Data were extracted by two authors independently (DAF and WB), and reviewed by the other (MDW). Discrepancies were resolved by discussion and consensus reached between the authors. A standardized data extraction form was made for the review. This form, available upon request, included the following sections: identification of the study (authors, journal and year of publication, language); study characteristics (design, total number of patients, period); study population (age, gestational age at infection, diagnostic method, differential diagnosis, pregnancy outcomes, birthweight, and head circumference); and analytical method. Assessment of the methodological quality of the observational studies was based on the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) [56]. The instrument consists of 12 items, the first eight being specific for noncomparative studies. To assess the quality of case reports, we used JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) critical appraisal checklist for case reports [57]. Each article was evaluated by two authors (MDW and DAF) independently, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.

Data synthesis and analysis

The studies were described according to country, study and sample characteristics, clinical examination, imaging tests, autopsy findings, complementary tests (laboratory, radiography, electrocardiography), and placental alterations.

Results

The search strategy yielded 2,048 studies. After exclusion of duplicates and application of inclusion criteria to the titles, abstracts, and full text, 81 studies were eligible for full text reading. Based on the full text reading, 46 articles were included in this review (Fig 1).

Flowchart of review process.
Fig 1

Flowchart of review process.

Among the articles, more than 90% presented end points appropriate to their aim and consecutive inclusion of patients according to Minors. Less than 20% of the studies reported adequately on the following criteria: “loss to follow-up less than 5%”, “prospective calculation of the study size”, “an adequate control group”, “Contemporary groups”, “baseline equivalence of groups” and “adequate statistical analyses” (Fig 2). From all case reports 36% did not describe patient´s history adequately. The other items were adequate in more than 90% of studies and two were not applicable (Fig 3).

Quality assessment of the studies included in the systematic review based on Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS).
Fig 2

Quality assessment of the studies included in the systematic review based on Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS).

Quality assessment of the studies included in the systematic review based on JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) critical appraisal checklist for case reports.
Fig 3

Quality assessment of the studies included in the systematic review based on JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) critical appraisal checklist for case reports.

Most of the studies were performed in Brazil (59%), the epicenter of reported cases. Regarding study design, most of the studies were case reports (n = 22) or case series (n = 20), and there were two cohort studies, one case-control, and one cross-sectional study. All the studies reported at least one laboratory method for the diagnosis of women and/or children exposed to Zika virus during pregnancy. Most of the studies described signs and symptoms in children exposed to Zika virus in the first and second trimesters (Table 1).

Table 1
Characteristics of the studies included.
AuthorCountryType of studySample sizeDiagnostic method (ZIKV)TorchMother’s age (average)Gestational age of infection (average)Gestational age of outcome of pregnancy (average)Outcome of pregnancyWeight Grams (mean)Cephalic perimeter (Centimetermean)Sex ratio M/F
Pomar et al (2017) [58]French GuianaCohort700RT-PCR*¥, IgM*#, IgG*#Yes281st trimester: 80, 2nd trimester:96, 3rd trimester:125-Therapeutic abortion:2, Fetal death 9:, Live birth:125, Ongoing pregnancy: 165---
Honein et al (2017) [59]EUACase series442RT-PCR*#, IgM*#, PRNT¥No--Fetal death:5, Live birth:21---
Brasil et al (2016) [19]BrazilCohort207RT-PCR*Yes311st trimester:16, 2nd trimester:27, 3rd trimester:2437.9Miscarriage:7, Fetal death:2, Live birth:49---
de Araújo et al (2016) [23]BrazilCase-control94RT-PCR*#, IgM*#, PRNT*Yes2436.37Fetal death:1, Live birth:31, 32077-0.74
Zin et al (2017) [60]BrazilCase series112RT-PCR*¥Yes-1st trimester:14, 2nd trimester: 8, 3rd trimester:2-Live birth:24---
Aragão et al (2017) [61]BrazilCase series12IgM#Yes-1st trimester: 6, 2nd trimester:3, Without symptoms:338.16Live birth:12-29.041.4
Ventura et al (2017) [62]BrazilCross-sectional32IgMYes261st trimester:13, 2nd trimester:9, 3rd trimester 3, Without symptoms:137.9Live birth:32262728.71.28
Schaub et al (2017) [63]MartiniqueCase series8RT-PCR*¥Yes261st trimester:6, Without symptoms: 228.12Therapeutic abortion:7, Live birth:1121822.691
Carvalho et al (2016) [64]BrazilCase series19RT-PCR, IgMYes261st trimester:11, 2nd trimester:2, Without symptoms:638.83Fetal death:1, Live birth:182554,6-0.9
Aragão et al (2017) [65]BrazilCase series23IgM*#, IgG*#Yes-1st trimester:, 2ndtrimester:, 3rd trimester, Without symptoms:37.43Live birth:23-28.911.3
Hazin et al (2016) [66]BrazilCase series23IgM#Yes---Live birth:23--1.3
Oliveira-Szejnfeld et al (2016) [67]BrazilCase series45RT-PCR*¥Yes--39.1Fetal death:3, Live birth:14-28.93-
Besnard et al (2016) [68]French PolynesianCase series19RT-PCR¥Yes---Therapeutic abortion:11, Live birth:8---
van der Linden et al (2016) [69]BrazilCase series7IgMYes-1st trimester:4, Without symptoms:3-Live birth:7-28.85-
Melo et al (2016) [70]BrazilCase series11RT-PCR¥, PRNT#Yes-1st trimester:9, 2nd trimester:1, Without symptoms:139.09Therapeutic abortion1:, Fetal death:2, Live birth:8-24.36-
Van der Linden et al (2017) [71]BrazilCase series13IgM#Yes-1st trimester:4, 2nd trimester:2, Without symptoms:838.3Live birth:13297132.232.25
Sanín-Blair et al (2017) [72]ColombiaCase report3RT-PCR¥No231st trimester: 3-Ongoing pregnancy: 3---
Meneses et al (2017) [73]BrazilCase series87PRNT#Yes241st trimester:47, 2ndtrimester:17, 3rd trimester:238.5Live birth:873257528.1-
Fernandez et al (2017) [74]EUACase report4RT-PCR#Yes-25.25Therapeutic abortion:4--1
Martines et al (2016) [40]BrazilCase report5RT-PCR, ImmunohistochemistryYes,1 no261st trimester: 527.4Miscarriage:2, Live birth:3, 2, 1239929.660.5
Sousa et al (2017) [75]BrazilCase series7RT-PCRNo-1st trimester: 736Live birth:7--1.33
Guillemette-Artur et al (2016) [76]French PolynesiaCase report3RT-PCR¥, IgM#Yes-1st trimester:229.2Therapeutic abortion:4--0.5
Castro et al (2017) [77]BrazilCase series8RT-PCR¥Yes291st trimester: 638.27Live birth:8-25.17-
Ventura et al (2016) [78]BrazilCase series40IgMYes261st trimester: 13, 2nd trimester: 11, 3rd trimester:3Pre-term 11

Term 28

Post-term 1
Live birth:24267429.51.1
Parra-Saavedra et al (2017) [79]ColombiaCase series17RT-PCR*¥No241st trimester: 10, 2nd trimester:4, Without symptoms:331Live birth:17219827.140
Del Campo et al (2017) [80]BrazilCase series83IgM#Yes---Live birth:12---
Chimelli et al (2017) [81]BrazilCase series10RT-PCR¥*, ImmunohistochemistryYes-1st trimester:6, 2nd trimester: 3, 3rd trimester137.5Fetal death:3, Live birth:7-31.31.5
Schaub et al (2017) [82]FranceCase series14RT-PCR*¥Yes-1st trimester: 13, 2nd trimester:127.36Miscarriage:12, Fetal death:1, Live birth:1---
Mattar et al (2017) [83]ColombiaCase report1RT-PCR, IgM*Yes332nd trimester: 139Live birth:1-27.5-
Culjat et al (2016) [84]EUACase report1RT-PCR, IgM*#, PRNTYes321st trimester: 139Live birth:1206327.30
Souza et al (2016) [85]BrazilCase report1RT-PCR¥, IgM*Yes172nd trimester: 139Live birth:1256528-
Perez et al (2016) [86]SpainCase report1RT-PCR*¥, IgM*, IgG*, PRNT*Yes201st trimester:121Therapeutic abortion:1295170
Van der Linden et al (2017) [87]BrazilCase report2IgMYes-1st trimester: 235.5Live birth:2319251
Souza et al (2016) [88]BrazilCase report2RT-PCR*#Yes27Without symptoms:238.5Live birth:23244535.250
Vorona et al (2016) [89]EUACase report1RT-PCR*¥No501st trimester:1-Therapeutic abortion:1---
Zacharias et al (2017) [90]EUACase report1RT-PCRNo-36Live birth:1188528.5-
Werner et al (2016) [91]BrazilCase report1RT-PCR*#, IgM*Yes311st trimester:1, 2nd trimester:, 3rd trimester, Without symptoms:37Live birth:1245028-
Freitas et al (2016) [92]BrazilCase report1IgM#No-38Live birth:11892--
Moron et al (2016) [93]BrazilCase report1IgG#Yes312nd trimester: 1-Live birth:1-30.50
Frutos et al (2017) [94]ArgentinaCase report1RT-PCR*¥, IgM#Yes271st trimester: 1-Live birth:1339031-
Acosta-Reyes et al (2017) [95]ColombiaCase report2RT-PCR¥Yes191st trimester: 1, 2ndtrimester:123.5Therapeutic abortion:2---
Vesnaver et al (2016) [96]SloveniaCase report1RT-PCR#, ImmunohistochemistryYes251st trimester: 132Fetal death:11470261
Sarno et al (2016) [97]BrazilCase report1RT-PCR, IgM*Yes20Without symptoms:132Fetal death:1930--
Driggers et al (2016) [45]EUACase report1RT-PCR*#. IgM#*, IgG#*Yes331st trimester: 121Therapeutic abortion:1---
Oliveira et al (2016) [98]BrazilCase report2RT-PCR¥No---Ongoing pregnancy: 2109823.75-
Narero et al (2016) [99]PanamaCase report1RT-PCR#, IgM*Yes20-32Live birth:11020231

Blood / serum / mother urine

*, Child blood / serum

#, Child tissues

Amniotic fluid

¥, Liquor

Placenta

, Neonatal death

, Post neonatal death

Not reported -

Regarding study design, most of the studies were case reports (n = 22) or case series (n = 20), and there were two cohort studies, one case-control, and one cross-sectional study. All the studies reported at least one laboratory method for the diagnosis of women and/or children exposed to Zika virus during pregnancy. Most of the studies described signs and symptoms in children exposed to Zika virus in the first and second trimesters (Table 1).

Regarding clinical signs, microcephaly was described in 21 articles [19,23,40,59,60,62,63,65,69,71,73,76,78,80,84,87,90,92,93,99,100], hypertonicity in eight [19,62,63,71,80,87,93,94], seizures in seven [19,40,62,70,71,73,84], and neurological crying/irritability in the early months of life in six [19,71,80,83,87,94] (Table 2). A frequently observed clinical sign was arthrogryposis, reported in 12 articles [40,61,69,71,73,75,80,8587,90,92]. Other osteoskeletal signs included clubfoot [85,87] and hip dysplasia [19,71]. Morphological changes of the head were described in ten articles [19,40,65,69,71,73,80,83,84,87] and overriding sutures or closed fontanels in five [70,71,80,83,84].

Table 2
Clinical signs of children exposed to ZIKV in pregnancy.
Clinical signsChildren exposed to ZIKVStudies N = 46
MinMax£n (%) 
Neurological abnormalitiesMicrocephaly18721 (46)[19,23,40,59,60,62,63,65,69,71,73,76,78,80,84,87,90,92,93,99,100]
Hypertonicity1588 (17)[19,62,63,71,80,87,93,94]
Seizures1877 (15)[19,40,62,70,71,73,84]
Neurological crying/irritability during first months of life1586 (13)[19,71,80,83,87,94]
Hyperexcitability/hyperreflexia1585 (11)[19,70,80,84,87]
Asymmetrical tonic neck reflex1134 (9)[70,71,83,87]
Clenched fists12582 (4)[19,80]
Distal tremors12582 (4)[19,80]
Centrally decreased muscle tone (upper extremities)1582 (4)[19,84]
Neurological impairment1582 (4)[19,83]
Encephalocele1262 (4)[59,99]
Altered visual fixation and pursuit2132 (4)16–17
Abnormal posturing1 (2)[19]
Altered motor reflexes1 (2)[19]
Hemiparesis1 (2)[19]
Hypoactivity1 (2)[19]
Hydrocephalus1 (2)[86]
Cortical blindness 1 (2)[84]
Osteoskeletal abnormalitiesArthrogryposis18712 (26)[40,61,69,71,73,75,80,8587,90,92]
Hip dysplasia13582 (4)[19,71]
Clubfoot1132 (4)[85,87]
Knee fovea1 (2)[19]
Cortical thumb1 (2)[19]
Elbow fovea1 (2)[19]
Polydactyly1 (2)[19]
Hand contractures / Camptodactyly1 (2)[80]
Feet malposition / contractures1 (2)[80]
Prominent calcaneus 1 (2)[80]
Ophthalmic abnormalitiesPosterior segment abnormalitiesRetinal abnormalities &11610(22)[60,62,6971,73,78,84,87,92]
Optic nerve abnormalities#115[60,62,69,70,78,84,87,92]
Abnormal visual function1325 (11)[62,63,71,80,84]
Extrinsic eye motilityStrabismus¨305 (11)[62,70,80] ¨
Nystagmus69[60,62]
Anterior segment abnormalitiesCataract114 (9)[70,98]
Glaucoma11[87,92]
Refractive errorAstigmatism2 (4)[62]
Myopia[62,87]
Hyperopia[62]
Abnormalities in other systemsMorphological changes of the headΦ18710 (22)[19,40,65,69,71,73,80,83,84,87]
Small for gestational age (SGA)1586 (13)[19,23,69,84,85,90]
Overriding sutures or closed fontanels1135 (11)[70,71,80,83,84]
Hearing abnormalities1584 (9)[19,59,63,87]
Unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis3873 (7)[40,70,73]
Dystonic movement32582 (4)[19,62]
Dysphagia13582 (4)[19,71]
Bilateral cryptorchidism. 132 (4)[40,84]
Large for gestational age (LGA)1 (2)[19]
Head lag1 (2)[19]
Failure to gain weight1 (2)[19]
Sacral dimple1 (2)[19]
Congenital heart disease1 (2)[19]
Dyskinesia1 (2)[71]
Increased deep tendon reflexes1 (2)[80]
Multiple dimples1 (2)[80]
Ambiguous genitalia1 (2)[75]
Coronal hypospadias1 (2)[84]

: minimum number of children investigated per article.

£: maximum number of children investigated per article.

&: Pigmented, chorioretinal atrophy and/or coloboma

#: Pallor, atrophy, increased excavation, hypoplasia and/or coloboma

¨: No information on number of children

Φ verlapping cranial sutures, prominent occipital bone, excess nuchal skin, craniofacial disproportion with depression of frontal and parietal bones

The most frequent ophthalmic abnormalities occurred in the posterior segment, found in 22% of the reviewed articles which included lesions of the retina (focal pigmentary retina mottling, chorioretinal atrophy and/or coloboma) and optic nerve (pallor, atrophy, increased excavation, hypoplasia and/or coloboma) [31,60,62,69,69,70,84,87,92]. Abnormalities of visual function were described in 11% of the articles [62,69,80,82,84], as well as extrinsic ocular motility (nystagmus and strabismus) [60,62,70,80]. Abnormalities in the anterior segment (cataract and glaucoma) appeared in 9% of the articles [70,87,94] and refractive error (myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism) in 4% [62,87].

Lesions in other organ systems were also observed, to a lesser extent: cardiovascular system, [19], genitourinary system (ambiguous genitalia [75] and bilateral cryptorchidism [40,84]), and gastrointestinal system (dysphagia [19,71]) (Table 2). Other clinical features included small for gestational age (SGA) in six studies [19,23,69,84,85,90], hearing abnormalities in four [19,59,63,87], and unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis in three articles [40,70,73] (Table 2).

Three articles described the association between congenital ZIKV infection, microcephaly, and other adverse pregnancy outcomes [19,23,58]. One case-control study demonstrated the association between microcephaly and ZIKV in neonates tested by Zika virus-specific IgM and quantitative RT-PCR in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. In addition to microcephaly, this study detected congenital malformations through abnormal brain findings on imaging tests in children with virus in the serum or cerebrospinal fluid and serum only [23]. One cohort study described adverse pregnancy outcomes, including cases of fetal loss in every trimester [19]. Another cohort study identified an association between ZIKV infection and CNS (central nervous system) anomalies, cerebral hyperechogenicity, and intrauterine fetal death [58] (Table 3).

Table 3
Clinical signs and adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with Zika Virus (ZIKV) exposure in pregnancy.
OutcomesOR/RRAdjusted ORStudyCountry
Microcephaly /ZIKV detected in serum or cerebrospinal fluid samples55.5 (8.6-∞)59.2 (9-∞)*[23]Brazil
55,6 (8.5-∞)**
Microcephaly /abnormal brain imaging findings113.3 (14.5-∞)
Microcephaly /normal brain imaging findings24.7 (2.9-∞) 
Central Nervous System anomaly2.11 (1.18–4.13) [58]French Guiana
Corpus callosum anomaly2.21 (1.08–5.26)
Cerebral hyperechogenicity3.98 (1.48–11.49)
Intrauterine fetal death3.98 (1.09–15.17) 
Adverse pregnancy outcomes4.03 (1.96–8.32) [19]Brazil

* maternal education

** maternal age

Imaging tests were used in 31 (67%) of the articles reviewed to detect altered signs potentially associated with Zika virus syndrome: ultrasound (80%), computed tomography (55%), magnetic resonance imaging (29%), and transfontanelar ultrasound (23%). Fourteen (45%) and 12 (39%) studies used three and two imaging methods, respectively (Table 4). The most frequent signs observed in imaging tests were located in the central nervous system: ventriculomegaly described in 35 articles [19,23,45,58,6471,73,74,76,7880,8285,87,8994,96,98,100,101]; parenchymal or cerebellar calcification (n = 33) [19,23,45,59,6271,73,74,76,7880,8285,87,91,93,94,9698,100,101]; microcephaly (n = 32) [19,40,45,58,59,63,64,66,67,70,73,74,76,79,8287,89,91,93,94,96101]; hypoplasia or atrophy of the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, or brainstem (n = 29) [19,45,6267,6971,73,74,76,79,80,82,84,85,87,89,91,9396,98,100,101]; abnormal cortical formation (n = 27) [19,23,40,58,6567,6971,73,74,76,7882,84,87,9093,100,101]; corpus callosum anomaly (n = 18) [45,58,62,65,6770,74,76,79,80,82,91,92,94,96,98]; and hydrocephalus (n = 3) [40,63,86] (Table 4). Cardiomegaly and diaphragmatic paralysis were detected by chest x-ray [102].

Table 4
Signs detected on imaging tests of children exposed to Zika Virus (ZIKV) in pregnancy.
SignsType of test*Children exposed to ZIKVStudies N = 46
MinMax£n (%) 
Neurological alterationsVentriculomegaly/ increased fluid spacesUS, TU, CT, MRI18135 (76)[19,23,45,58,6471,73,74,76,7880,8285,87,8994,96,98,100,101]
Parenchymal or cerebellar calcificationUS, TU, CT, MRI18133 (72)[19,23,45,59,6271,73,74,76,7880,8285,87,91,93,94,9698,100,101]
MicrocephalyUS, TU, CT, MRI17932 (70)[19,40,45,58,59,63,64,66,67,70,73,74,76,79,8287,89,91,93,94,96101]
Hypoplasia or atrophy of cerebral cortex, cerebellum, brainstemUS, TU, CT, MRI14129 (63)[19,45,6267,6971,73,74,76,79,80,82,84,85,87,89,91,9396,98,100,101]
Abnormal cortical formation (encephalomalacic changes, abnormal gyration, lissencephaly)US, TU, CT, MRI18127 (59)[19,23,40,58,6567,6971,73,74,76,7882,84,87,9093,100,101]
Corpus callosum anomalyUS, TU, CT, MRI13218 (39)[45,58,62,65,6770,74,76,79,80,82,91,92,94,96,98]
Cysts or pseudocystsUS, TU, MRI1418 (17)[19,63,68,76,87,88,96,101]
Increased cisterna magnaUS, CT, MRI1417 (15)[19,65,69,85,93,96,98]
Fetal Dandy-Walker malformationUS, TU, CT, MRI1303 (7)[64,73,90]
HemorrhageUS, TU, MRI1413 (7)[19,45,96]
HydrocephalusUS, MRI183 (7)[40,63,86]
Posterior fossa anomalyUS, TU14272 (4)[58,82]
Cerebellar abnormalitiesUS, MRI17242 (4)[78,79]
AnencephalyUS242 (4)[74,95]
Lenticulostriate vasculopathyTU222 (4)[87,88]
Supratentorial dilatationUS, TU, MRI1 (2)[19]
Ischemic parenchymal lesionsUS, MRI1 (2)[19]
Abnormal middle cerebral arteryUS1 (2)[19]
BrachycephalyUS1 (2)[19]
Cerebral hyperechogenicityUS, TU1 (2)[58]
Abnormal ponsUS1 (2)[82]
Polymalformative syndrome (encephalocele, anophthalmia, arthrogryposis, fetal hydrops)US1 (2)[82]
HoloprosencephalyUS1 (2)[74]
SchizencephalyUS1 (2)[95]
HydranencephalyUS1 (2)[97]
EncephaloceleUS1 (2)[99]
ColpocephalyTU, MRI1 (2)[91]
Alterations in other systemsPolyhydramnios/oligohydramniosUS1417 (15)[19,58,64,70,74,90,100]
Intrauterine growth restrictionUS, TU, CT, MRI1417 (15)[19,63,64,82,85,91,97]
ArthrogryposisUS, TU, CT, MRI1416 (13)[19,40,64,70,74,86]
ClubfootUS, TU, CT, MRI17413 (7)[19,64,79]
Premature closure of fontanelleCT, MRI163 (7)[93,65,91]
Hepatomegaly/liver calcifications US, TU, CT, MRI8273 (7)[58,63]
Liver/spleen echogenicityUS27412 (4)[19,58]
Intestinal hyperechogenicityUS4272 (4)[58,68]
Small for gestational age (SGA)US, TU3272 (4)[40,58]
Genitourinary tract anomalyUS3272 (4)[40,58]
Subcutaneous edemaUS112 (4)[96,97]
HydrothoraxUS112 (4)[96,97]
Fetal macrosomiaUS1 (2)[19]
Abnormal umbilical artery flowUS1 (2)[19]
Placental insufficiencyUS1 (2)[19]
TachyarrhythmiaUS1 (2)[58]
CardiomyopathyUS1 (2)[58]
Hyperechogenicity of aortic valve, mitral valve, and aortic rootUS, TU, CT, MRI1 (2)[64]
Thymic calcificationsUS, TU, CT, MRI1 (2)[64]
AscitesUS1 (2)[97]

*US: pelvic or obstetric ultrasound; TU: transfontanelar ultrasound: CT: computed tomography, MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

: minimum number of children investigated per article.

£: maximum number of children investigated per article.

Additional lesions observed with imaging tests were: polyhydramnios or oligohydramnios [19,58,64,70,74,90,100] and intrauterine growth restriction [19,63,64,82,85,91,97], described in seven articles. As the clinical examination indicated, osteoskeletal lesions were also frequent: arthrogryposis (n = 6) [19,40,64,70,74,86] and clubfoot [19,64,79] (n = 3). Other organ systems were involved, although less frequently: gastrointestinal (intestinal hyperechogenicity (n = 2) [58,68], liver calcifications and hepatomegaly (n = 2) [19,58], cardiovascular (tachyarrhythmia and cardiomyopathy (n = 1) [58], respiratory (hydrothorax (n = 1), and genitourinary (genitourinary tract anomaly (n = 2) [40,58] (Table 4).

The following other lesions were observed on imaging tests in one study [19] and can help elucidate the natural history of Zika virus infection: abnormal middle cerebral artery, abnormal umbilical artery flow, and placental insufficiency (Table 4).

Eight studies [40,58,68,81,84,90,93,103] reported the placenta’s characteristics, especially in cases of fetal death. There were calcifications in five articles [40,68,81,93,103], and vascular alterations such as villous infarction [40,81,93] and scattered intervillous thrombi [84,93].

Seven articles reported data on miscarriage and autopsy in neonatal and fetal death: microcephaly (n = 6) [40,45,75,81,90,97], calcifications (n = 4) [40,75,81,90], CNS hypoplasia (n = 4) [40,45,75,81], ventriculomegaly (n = 3) [40,75,81], arthrogryposis (n = 5) [40,75,81,90,97], and pulmonary hypoplasia (n = 2) [40,75,90] (Table 5).

Table 5
Autopsy findings of children exposed to Zika Virus (ZIKV) in pregnancy.
Autopsy findingsChildren exposed to ZIKVStudies N = 46
MinMax£n (%) 
Neurological findingsMicrocephaly1106 (13)[40,45,75,81,90,97]
Calcifications1104 (9)[40,75,81,90]
CNS hypoplasia1104 (9)[40,45,75,81]
Ventriculomegaly3103 (7)[40,75,81]
Inflammatory infiltrate in leptomeninges and brain173 (7)[40,45,75]
Vascular congestion in leptomeninges or brain372 (4)[40,75]
Anterior spinal horn cell loss1 (2)[81]
Pachygyria1 (2)[75]
Cerebral gliosis1 (2)[75]
Lissencephaly1 (2)[40]
Holoprosencephaly1 (2)[40]
Cerebral necrosis1 (2)[40]
Hydrocephalus1 (2)[40]
Malformation of cortical development with agyria1 (2)[90]
Dandy-Walker syndrome1 (2)[90]
Findings in other systemsArthrogryposis1105 (11)[40,75,81,90,97]
Pulmonary hypoplasia133 (7)[40,75,90]
Pulmonary hemorrhage372 (4)[40,75]
Virus detected in fetal tissues372 (4)[40,63]
Hydropic degeneration of liver172 (4)[75,90]
Neurogenic muscle atrophy1 (2)[40]
Inflammatory infiltrate in lung1 (2)[75]
Liver apoptosis1 (2)[75]
Liver steatosis1 (2)[75]
Intrauterine growth restriction1 (2)[75]
Ventricular septal defect1 (2)[90]

: minimum number of children investigated per article.

£: maximum number of children investigated per article.

Neurological signs and symptoms were the ones most frequently described in both the imaging tests (Table 4) and autopsies (Table 5).

Discussion

In our review, the main signs and symptoms associated with congenital Zika virus syndrome were microcephaly, parenchymal or cerebellar calcifications, ventriculomegaly, CNS hypoplasia or atrophy; arthrogryposis; ophthalmic findings mainly focal pigmentary retina mottling, chorioretinal atrophy and/or coloboma, pallor, atrophy, increased excavation, hypoplasia and/or coloboma of optic nerve and abnormal visual function and low birthweight for gestational age.

Microcephaly was the most frequent sign found in neonates exposed to ZIKV during pregnancy among the articles in our review [28,3841]. Forty one studies reported microcephaly [19,23,40,45,5860,6267,69,70,70,71,7376,7987,8994,96101]. Other studies, using different methodologies, have reported similar results [104106], including increased prevalence of microcephaly among children exposed to ZIKV in other systematic review [47] when compared to the prevalence in other studies of unexposed children in Brazil and Europe [107,108].

Parenchymal or cerebellar calcification were described in 37 studies of our review [19,23,40,45,59,6271,7376,7885,87,90,91,93,94,9698,100,101] and also in other review which reported a prevalence of 42.6% [47]. These findings may also be found in congenital infections known by the mnemonic TORCH (Toxoplasmosis, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Herpes. However, the distribution of intracranial calcifications differs in each congenital infection: typically larger, denser and subcortical in congenital ZIKV, punctate and periventricular or cortical in CMV, diffuse and widely distributed in congenital toxoplasmosis and at basal ganglia in rubella [41,109111]. Besides that it should be noted that some neurological changes (calcifications and cerebral atrophy) in congenital Zika syndrome are similar to other syndromes of infectious and also genetic etiology, such as Aicardi-Goutières syndrome [112].

Ventriculomegaly was described in 32 studies reviewed [19,23,45,56,56,58,6374,76,7880,8284,8794,96,98,100], an important sign regarding the risk of developing hydrocephalus and the need for surgical intervention for ventriculoperitoneal shunt, which was also observed in other studies [47,113]. In our study, hydrocephalus was associated with severe signs and symptoms, such as: epilepsy, motor dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, arthrogryposis (one-third of cases), and visual and hearing disorders [40,66,82,86,95,101], in agreement with Linden (2019) [113], who identified severe neurological disorders and cognitive dysfunction in one-third of children who progressed with hydrocephalus.

Congenital infections such as those involving Toxoplasma gondii and cytomegalovirus have also been associated with serious brain alterations such as calcifications and ventriculomegaly [114,115]. However, unlike these other infections, ZIKV infection is known to be associated with severe microcephaly, with partially collapsed skull, thin cerebral cortex with subcortical calcifications, macular scars, and retinal changes as a result of the important viral tropism for fetal neural and ocular progenitor cells [116]. In addition, congenital contractures (bone deformities) are also associated with ZIKV infection during pregnancy, although observed less frequently [117]. In short, these findings can also occur in similar congenital syndromes associated with other infectious diseases, such as toxoplasmosis, syphilis, varicella, parvovirus B1, rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex [23,42,58,118] but the signs and symptoms presented by CZS seem to be more serious.

The osteoskeletal system was the second most frequently altered organ system in newborns exposed in uterus to ZIKV and arthrogryposis was described in 18 studies reviewed [19,40,61,64,6971,7375,80,81,8587,90,92,97], as observed by other studies, mainly in more severe cases [15,47,79,113].

Anatomical [60,62,6971,73,78,84,87,92] and functional [62,63,71,80,84] changes of the eye were described in 12 articles, such as posterior and anterior segment abnormalities, extrinsic eye motility and abnormal visual function. Many of these anatomical changes may impact the child’s visual function in the future, since they affect prime areas of the eye. Importantly, since the child’s first contact with the environment is through eyesight, children with visual impairment commonly experience delayed neuropsychomotor development, which, alongside the syndrome’s other signs and symptoms, hinder the child’s ability to integrate with his or her surroundings [119]. These ocular findings were described also in other studies descripted [47,120122].

TORCH infections have also been associated with serious ophthalmic alterations. In congenital toxoplasmosis infection, chorioretinal lesions are usually bilateral and can present with active lesions or regressed scar [60,123]. Congenital cytomegalovirus and herpes virus infections can also manifest with active ocular inflammation. In Zika virus infection, however, there has been no active ocular inflammation cases reported so far [123]. There is usually not pigmentary mottling seen outside of areas of chorioretinal atrophy in congenital toxoplasmosis infection, as seen in zika virus infection [60]. In congenital rubella infection, the pigment mottling is usually diffused compared with the focal pigment mottling seen in zika virus infection [60]. Congenital cytomegalovirus can present with chorioretinal lesions similar to congenital toxoplasmosis but less heavily pigmentated and with pale or small optic disc [124,125]. Optic nerve hypoplasia, commonly seen in ZIKV congenital infection, is rarely seen in rubella, toxoplasmosis and herpes congenital infections [60].

The pathophysiology of ZIKV infection and the mechanism of the virus’ passage across the placental barrier are still under investigation [48]. The exact timing of placental and fetal infection in relation to maternal viremia is also still unclear, as is the correlation between prolonged viremia and the development of congenital Zika syndrome [48]. Placental alterations were reported in eight studies [40,58,68,81,84,90,93,103], but the role of placental viral infection in determining the syndrome’s severity has not been determined to date, as stated by other authors who found mild and nonspecific pathological findings in the placenta in pregnancies with ZIKV infection [126129].

The effects of ZIKV on the fetus are more frequent and severe when maternal infection occurs in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, resulting in: spontaneous abortion; therapeutic abortion due to major congenital malformation; various congenital malformations; fetal death; and neonatal and post-neonatal deaths [19,42,59,60], as corroborated by other studies [107,130133]. Notably, the total number of abortions in Brazil, the epicenter of ZIKV cases, may be underestimated, since therapeutic abortion is prohibited by law, even though a recent study did not find an increase in hospitalizations due to complications of abortion during the epidemic [77]. In addition to adverse pregnancy outcomes and deaths, our review presents evidence that early maternal infection during pregnancy is associated with higher likelihood of congenital abnormalities such as microcephaly, ophthalmic lesions, osteoskeletal malformations, and various brain alterations [58,88] as described in other studies [19,129,130,133141].

Among the imaging tests performed, obstetric ultrasound was the most frequent, in addition to transfontanelar ultrasound (TU), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the newborn (Table 4). Transfontanelar ultrasound, CT, and MRI were reported less frequently, possibly due to the limited access to those exams in some settings. Obstetric ultrasound proved to be useful for tracking ZIKV-related brain injury in prenatal care in pregnant women exposed to ZIKV. Although less accurate than CT and MRI it is available in many health facilities [142,143].

One point to highlight in our review is the anatomopathological analysis. It was possible to notice either the severity of the systemic impairment of the cases that died, especially those whose maternal infection occurred in the first trimester of pregnancy and the correspondence of clinical and anatomopathological findings.

Low birthweight and intrauterine growth restriction were common findings in the studies in the current review [19,63,64,69,82,85,8991], representing a risk for children exposed to ZIKV during pregnancy. A recent study found that prevalence of Low birthweight in infants with CZS was more than four times that of the overall sample of live births [144].

Gastrointestinal disorders were reported [19,58,64,75,90], including liver disorders [58,68], intestinal alterations, and dysphagia [68,71]. Dysphagia can increase the risk of bronchoaspiration, resulting in aspiration pneumonia or death from asphyxiation, requiring gastrostomy in the affected infants [113,145]. Structural changes in the genitourinary system were reported [40,58,75,84] and were also described by Villamil-Gómez (2019) in fetal autopsies [146]. Bladder impairment and possible kidney damage such as very low bladder capacity, bladder hyperactivity with increased consistency, high bladder pressure during the filling phase, and high postvoid residual volume (PVR) and/or recurrent urinary tract infection were reported in older children [147]. Congenital cardiovascular anomalies were identified in children exposed to ZIKV such as cardiomyopathy, hyperechogenicity of aortic valve, mitral valve, and aortic root [19,58,64,100]. Other studies have also described cardiological symptoms and imaging findings such as complex congenital heart disease, echocardiographic abnormalities, and cardiac overload [148151].

Pulmonary alterations were less common, mostly detected by autopsy and thus tending to be more severe [40,75,90]. Other abnormalities such as hydrothorax [96,97] and diaphragmatic paralysis [40,73,98] were reported. A recent study investigating the cause of diaphragmatic paralysis in three infants with CZS reported phrenic nerve dysfunction detected by electromyography [113]. Hearing abnormalities were reported in some studies [19,59,63,87], highlighting the need for specific tests for early detection, since they can further impair the child’s interaction with the environment and affect neurodevelopment, as described by Leal et al. (2016) [152].

Congenital Zika syndrome and all its effects on children according to age group still need to be evaluated in light of new findings. Our review supported the characterization of the syndrome in infants up to six months of age since the initial reporting of cases. Recent studies have identified neurological disorders such as delay in neurodevelopment, mainly in the domain of language in children exposed to ZIKV who were asymptomatic at birth [133,153]. Such findings are relevant, since there is evidence that ZIKV can continue to replicate in the infant’s brain after birth [154], and that cerebral growth of infants exposed during pregnancy can decelerate, even after birth [69].

Cohort studies are needed to characterize the syndrome’s signs and symptoms according to age group in order to assess the impact on children’s cognitive development. Recent studies indicate that neurological changes can negatively impact the children’s motor and cognitive levels, with serious consequences for the social life of the patients and their families. Most of these children display severe motor dysfunction [155,156], delayed functional performance [132], difficulties in eating and sleeping, visual and auditory abnormalities, seizures [156], swallowing dysfunction, movement abnormalities, and epilepsy [153]. Complications associated with respiratory infections, dysphagia, and epilepsy can be fatal for the most severely affected infants [97,64,135].

Congenital Zika syndrome is a serious public health problem, both because of the clinical severity of the cases and the extent of functional impairment. Absence of signs and symptoms at birth in exposed infants does not rule out their appearance later in childhood, thus highlighting the importance of structuring healthcare networks for comprehensive monitoring and care of these children. The high prevalence of asymptomatic cases at birth (65 to 83%) [5,157] can delay the identification of the association between congenital syndromes (with or without late onset) and ZIKV infection in the mother during pregnancy. Efforts are needed to provide care and support for all the needs of children with congenital Zika syndrome and their families, as well as effective organization of healthcare and social services.

The ZIKV reemergence in regions with autochthonous transmission and the introduction of the virus in areas with established vector mosquito infestation may increase the risk of the development of congenital Zika syndrome in all regions of the world, especially in Africa, the Americas, Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific [158].

In the absence of effective vaccines, licensed to date [161,162], and considering the complexity of effective vector control, innovative intersectoral strategies that transcend exclusive vector chemical control actions should be incorporated in areas with viral circulation [159164]. Prevention strategies such as the use of repellents by pregnant women and condoms by sexual partners, both for travelers to regions with ZIKV circulation, and for residents of risk areas, as well as the implementation of strict screening protocols in the donation system of blood should be implemented. In addition, pregnant women and those intending to become pregnant may be advised to avoid unnecessary travel to endemic regions [165].

One limitation to the study was the low number of comparative clinical studies. The inclusion of case series and case reports, with lower levels of scientific evidence, is justified for the investigation of new and rare diseases such as congenital Zika syndrome, since evidence based on clinical case reports is necessary to understand the natural history of a new illness [166]. We chose to include only studies with laboratory confirmation of cases, seeking accurate estimates of maternal-fetal transmission and risk of symptomatic congenital infection. This criterion excluded other studies published during the period analyzed.

Conclusion

The review of clinical, imaging, and anatomopathological findings allowed the characterization of congenital Zika syndrome, especially in children born to mothers with laboratory-confirmed ZIKV infection during pregnancy.

Our results show that the congenital Zika syndrome encompasses several malformations mainly in the neurological, osteoskeletal, and visual systems, although the syndrome can affect other organ systems. ZIKV infection is also associated with several adverse pregnancy outcomes, including fetal loss.

We highlight the following findings: (a) in the neurological system: ventriculomegaly, parenchymal or cerebellar calcification, microcephaly, hypoplasia or atrophy of the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and brainstem, abnormal cortical formation, corpus callosum anomaly, hydrocephalus, hypertonicity, and seizures; (b) in the osteoskeletal system: arthrogryposis and clubfoot; and (c) in the visual system: ophthalmic changes in the posterior and anterior segments and abnormal visual function.

Congenital Zika syndrome also impacts the health system and the families’ daily lives, requiring collaboration between levels of healthcare and inter-sector cooperation aimed at comprehensive care for these children. The current review’s findings are thus essential for understanding the disease profile in patients and to assist the development and updating of more specific clinical protocols.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for support from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

Abbreviations

ZIKVZika virus
CNScentral nervous system
SINASCSystem on Live Births
WHOWorld Health Organization
PICOpopulation, intervention, comparison, outcome
MINORSMethodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies
JBIJoanna Briggs Institute) critical appraisal checklist for case reports
TORCHToxoplasmosis, Rubella, Cytomegalovirus and Herpes
CMVCytomegalovirus

References

GWADick, SFKitchen, AJHaddow. Zika Virus (I). Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1952 9 1;46(5):50920. 10.1016/0035-9203(52)90042-4

FNMacNamara. Zika virus: A report on three cases of human infection during an epidemic of jaundice in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1954 3 1;48(2):13945. 10.1016/0035-9203(54)90006-1

NJMarchette, RGarcia, ARudnick. Isolation of Zika Virus from Aedes Aegypti Mosquitoes in Malaysia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1969 5 1;18(3):4115. 10.4269/ajtmh.1969.18.411

KCSmithburn, AJHaddow. Ntaya Virus. A Hitherto Unknown Agent Isolated from Mosquitoes Collected in Uganda. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1951 5 1;77(1):1303. 10.3181/00379727-77-18700

MRDuffy, T-HChen, WTHancock, AMPowers, JLKool, RSLanciotti, et al Zika Virus Outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med. 2009 6 11;360(24):253643. 10.1056/NEJMoa0805715

MHennessey, MFischer, JEStaples. Zika Virus Spreads to New Areas—Region of the Americas, May 2015–January 2016. Am J Transplant. 2016 3 1;16(3):10314. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6503e1

Al BDF et. Probable Non–Vector-borne Transmission of Zika Virus, Colorado, USA—Volume 17, Number 5—May 2011—Emerging Infectious Disease journal—CDC. [cited 2017 Oct 23]; Available from: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/17/5/10-1939_article

A-CGourinat, OO’Connor, ECalvez, CGoarant, MDupont-Rouzeyrol. Detection of Zika Virus in Urine. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 1;21(1):846. 10.3201/eid2101.140894

DMusso, CRoche, ERobin, TNhan, ATeissier, V-MCao-Lormeau. Potential Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 2;21(2):35961. 10.3201/eid2102.141363

10 

DMusso, DJGubler. Zika Virus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 7;29(3):487524. 10.1128/CMR.00072-15

11 

HNishiura, RKinoshita, KMizumoto, YYasuda, KNah. Transmission potential of Zika virus infection in the South Pacific. Int J Infect Dis. 2016 4;45:957. 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.02.017

12 

AJJohnson, DAMartin, NKarabatsos, JTRoehrig. Detection of Anti-Arboviral Immunoglobulin G by Using a Monoclonal Antibody-Based Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2000 5;38(5):182731. 10.1128/JCM.38.5.1827-1831.2000

13 

AJRodriguez-Morales, WEVillamil-Gómez, CFranco-Paredes. The arboviral burden of disease caused by co-circulation and co-infection of dengue, chikungunya and Zika in the Americas. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2016 6;14(3):1779. 10.1016/j.tmaid.2016.05.004

14 

AXimenes RA de, BMiranda-Filho D de, EBBrickley, URMontarroyos, CMTMartelli, TVBde Araújo, et al Zika virus infection in pregnancy: Establishing a case definition for clinical research on pregnant women with rash in an active transmission setting. PLoS Negl Trop Dis [Internet]. 2019 10 7 [cited 2020 Oct 14];13(10). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6797234/

15 

PBrasil, GACalvet, AMSiqueira, MWakimoto, PCde Sequeira, ANobre, et al Zika Virus Outbreak in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Clinical Characterization, Epidemiological and Virological Aspects. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 4;10(4):e0004636 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004636

16 

UFaluyi, OObadare, ASangem, CAOnuegbu, SMedavarapu. Complications Associated with Zika Virus Infection: A Systematic Review Study. Am Sci Res J Eng Technol Sci ASRJETS. 2016 8 28;24(1):15161.

17 

WHO. Zika virus [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/zika-virus

18 

JUBraga, CBressan, APRDalvi, GACalvet, RPDaumas, NRodrigues, et al Accuracy of Zika virus disease case definition during simultaneous Dengue and Chikungunya epidemics. PLOS ONE. 2017 6 26;12(6):e0179725 10.1371/journal.pone.0179725

19 

PBrasil, JPPereiraJr, MEMoreira, RMRibeiro Nogueira, LDamasceno, MWakimoto, et al Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med. 2016 12 15;375(24):232134. 10.1056/NEJMoa1602412

20 

CBrito. Zika Virus: A New Chapter in the History of Medicine. Acta Médica Port. 2016 12 31;28(6):67980.

21 

CWCardoso, IADPaploski, MKikuti, MSRodrigues, MMOSilva, GSCampos, et al Outbreak of Exanthematous Illness Associated with Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue Viruses, Salvador, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 12;21(12):22746. 10.3201/eid2112.151167

22 

Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group. Microcephaly in Infants, Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 6;22 (6):10903. 10.3201/eid2206.160062

23 

TVBde Araujo, LCRodrigues, RAde Alencar Ximenes, Dde Barros Miranda-Filho, URMontarroyos, APLde Melo, et al Association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly in Brazil, January to May, 2016: preliminary report of a case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 12;16(12):135663. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30318-8

24 

WVde Souza, TVBarreto de Araujo, M de FPMilitao Albuquerque, MCBraga, RAde Alencar Ximenes, D de BMiranda-Filho, et al Microcephaly in Pernambuco State, Brazil: epidemiological characteristics and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of cutoff points for reporting suspected cases. Cad Saude Publica. 2016 1;32(4):e00017216 10.1590/0102-311X00017216

25 

PFreitas B de, ODias JR de, JPrazeres, GASacramento, AIKo, MMaia, et al Ocular Findings in Infants With Microcephaly Associated With Presumed Zika Virus Congenital Infection in Salvador, Brazil. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 5 1;134(5):52935. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0267

26 

DMusso, EJNilles, V-MCao-Lormeau. Rapid spread of emerging Zika virus in the Pacific area. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 10 1;20(10):O5956. 10.1111/1469-0691.12707

27 

EOehler, LWatrin, PLarre, ILeparc-Goffart, SLastere, FValour, et al Zika virus infection complicated by Guillain-Barre syndrome—case report, French Polynesia, December 2013. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2014 3 6;19(9). 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.9.20720

28 

WK deOliveira. Increase in Reported Prevalence of Microcephaly in Infants Born to Women Living in Areas with Confirmed Zika Virus Transmission During the First Trimester of Pregnancy—Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 23];65 Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6509e2.htm 10.15585/mmwr.mm6509e2

29 

PAHO/WHO. Epidemiological Alert Neurological syndrome, congenital malformations, and Zika virus infection. Implications for public health in the Americas. [Internet]. 2015 Available from: http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&Itemid=&gid=32405&lang=en.

30 

CVentura., MMaia., TMartins., FPatriota., CAgra., LVentura., et al Variables related to the ophthalmoscopic findings identified in infants with presumed zika virus congenital infection. Ophthalmologica. 2016;236:33 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.07.012

31 

CVVentura, MMaia, BVVentura, VVDLinden, EBAraujo, RCRamos, et al Ophthalmological findings in infants with microcephaly and presumable intra-uterus Zika virus infection. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016 2;79(1):13. 10.5935/0004-2749.20160002

32 

ALannuzel, J-LFergé, QLobjois, ASignate, BRozé, BTressières, et al Long-term outcome in neuroZika: When biological diagnosis matters. Neurology. 2019 21;92(21):e240620. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007536

33 

IRFda Silva, JAFrontera, AMBispo de Filippis, OJM doNascimento, RIO-GBS-ZIKV Research Group. Neurologic Complications Associated With the Zika Virus in Brazilian Adults. JAMA Neurol. 2017 01;74(10):11908. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.1703

34 

FMarinho, VEM deAraújo, DLPorto, HLFerreira, MRSCoelho, RCRLecca, et al Microcefalia no Brasil: prevalência e caracterização dos casos a partir do Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos (Sinasc), 2000–2015. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2016 12;25(4):70112. 10.5123/S1679-49742016000400004

35 

Bastos LFCS. OPAS/OMS Brasil—OMS declara fim de Emergência de Saúde Pública Internacional, mas diz que resposta ao zika e suas consequências deve continuar | OPAS/OMS [Internet]. Pan American Health Organization / World Health Organization 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 23]. Available from: http://www.paho.org/bra/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5297:oms-declara-fim-de-emergencia-de-saude-publica-internacional-mas-diz-que-resposta-ao-zika-e-suas-consequencias-deve-continuar&Itemid=812

36 

WHO. La Directora General de la OMS resume el resultado del Comité de Emergencia sobre el virus de Zika [Internet]. WHO 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 23]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2016/emergency-committee-zika-microcephaly/es/

37 

Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group. Microcephaly in Infants, Pernambuco State, Brazil, 2015—Volume 22, Number 6—June 2016—Emerging Infectious Disease journal—CDC. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 22]; Available from: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/6/16-0062_article

38 

A-NAbbasi. Zika virus infection; vertical transmission and fetal congenital anomalies. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad JAMC. 2016 3;28(1):12.

39 

DDe Barros Miranda-Filho, CMTMartelli, RADe Alencar Ximenes, TVBAraújo, MAWRocha, RCFRamos, et al Initial description of the presumed congenital Zika syndrome. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(4):598600. 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303115

40 

RBMartines, JBhatnagar, AMde Oliveira Ramos, HPFDavi, SDIglezias, CTKanamura, et al Pathology of congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil: a case series. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016 8 27;388(10047):898904. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30883-2

41 

KRussell. Update: Interim Guidance for the Evaluation and Management of Infants with Possible Congenital Zika Virus Infection—United States, August 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Dec 3];65 Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6533e2.htm 10.15585/mmwr.mm6533e2

42 

FKrauer, MRiesen, LReveiz, OTOladapo, RMartínez-Vega, TVPorgo, et al Zika Virus Infection as a Cause of Congenital Brain Abnormalities and Guillain–Barré Syndrome: Systematic Review. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2017 1 3;14(1). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5207634/ 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002203

43 

AVCCoelho, SCrovella. Microcephaly Prevalence in Infants Born to Zika Virus-Infected Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 8 5;18(8). 10.3390/ijms18081714

44 

MJCounotte, DEgli-Gany, MRiesen, MAbraha, TVPorgo, JWang, et al Zika virus infection as a cause of congenital brain abnormalities and Guillain-Barre syndrome: From systematic review to living systematic review. F1000Research. 2018;7:196 10.12688/f1000research.13704.1

45 

RWDriggers, C-YHo, EMKorhonen, SKuivanen, AJJaaskelainen, TSmura, et al Zika Virus Infection with Prolonged Maternal Viremia and Fetal Brain Abnormalities. N Engl J Med. 2016 6 2;374(22):214251. 10.1056/NEJMoa1601824

46 

GDuarte, AFMoron, ATimerman, CEFernandes, CMariani Neto, GLde Almeida Filho, et al Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women and Microcephaly. Rev Bras Ginecol E Obstet. 2017 5;39(5):23548. 10.1055/s-0037-1603450

47 

SFNithiyanantham, ABadawi. Maternal infection with Zika virus and prevalence of congenital disorders in infants: systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Public Health Rev Can Sante Publique. 2019 5 10; 10.17269/s41997-019-00215-2

48 

NRobinson, EEMayorquin Galvan, IGZavala Trujillo, MGZavala-Cerna. Congenital Zika syndrome: Pitfalls in the placental barrier. Rev Med Virol. 2018 9;28(5):e1985 10.1002/rmv.1985

49 

AWilder-Smith, CRChang, WYLeong. Zika in travellers 1947–2017: a systematic review. J Travel Med. 2018 7 1;25(1). 10.1093/jtm/tay044

50 

TFGalvão, SAPansani T de, DHarrad. Principais itens para relatar Revisões sistemáticas e Meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA. Epidemiol E Serviços Saúde. 2015 6;24(2):33542.

51 

OpenGrey [Internet]. [cited 2019 Sep 27]. Available from: http://www.opengrey.eu/

52 

MEgger, GDSmith, GADouglas, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2. ed, [Nachdr.]. London: BMJ Books; 2009. 487 p. (Medical research).

53 

JHiggins, JThomas, MCumpdton, TLi, MPage, VWelch. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane, 2019. Available from. [Internet]. Version 6.0 (updated July 2019). 2019 Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

54 

APaez. Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid-Based Med. 2017;10(3):23340. 10.1111/jebm.12266

55 

HBalshem, AStevens, MAnsari, SNorris, DKansagara, TShamliyan, et al Finding Grey Literature Evidence and Assessing for Outcome and Analysis Reporting Biases When Comparing Medical Interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program In: Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 [cited 2020 Sep 19]. (AHRQ Methods for Effective Health Care). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK174882/

56 

B KarenSlim, ENini, DForestier, FKwiatkowski, YPanis, JChipponiHIPPONI. Development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712716. 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x

57 

critical-appraisal-tools—Critical Appraisal Tools | Joanna Briggs Institute [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 27]. Available from: https://joannabriggs.org/critical-appraisal-tools

58 

LPomar, GMalinger, GBenoist, GCarles, YVille, DRousset, et al Association between Zika virus and fetopathy: a prospective cohort study in French Guiana. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 6;49(6):72936. 10.1002/uog.17404

59 

MAHonein, ALDawson, EEPetersen, AMJones, EHLee, MMYazdy, et al Birth Defects Among Fetuses and Infants of US Women With Evidence of Possible Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 2017 1 3;317(1):5968. 10.1001/jama.2016.19006

60 

A.AZin., ITsui., JRossetto., ZVasconcelos., KAdachi., SValderramos., et al Screening criteria for ophthalmic manifestations of congenital zika virus infection. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(9):84754. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1474

61 

MFVVAragão, AMBrainer-Lima, ACHolanda, Vvan der Linden, LVasco Aragao, MLMSilva Junior, et al Spectrum of Spinal Cord, Spinal Root, and Brain MRI Abnormalities in Congenital Zika Syndrome with and without Arthrogryposis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 5;38(5):104553. 10.3174/ajnr.A5125

62 

LOVentura, CVVentura, LLawrence, Vvan der Linden, Avan der Linden, ALGois, et al Visual impairment in children with congenital Zika syndrome. J AAPOS. 2017;21(4):295299.e2. 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.04.003

63 

BSchaub., MVouga., FNajioullah., MGueneret., AMonthieux., CHarte., et al Analysis of blood from Zika virus-infected fetuses: a prospective case series. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(5):5207. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30102-0

64 

FHCCarvalho, KMCordeiro, ABPeixoto, GTonni, AFMoron, FELFeitosa, et al Associated ultrasonographic findings in fetuses with microcephaly because of suspected Zika virus (ZIKV) infection during pregnancy. Prenat Diagn. 2016 9;36(9):8827. 10.1002/pd.4882

65 

MFAragão, VVan Der Linden, AMBrainer-Lima, RRCoeli, MARocha, PSDa Silva, et al Clinical features and neuroimaging (CT and MRI) findings in presumed Zika virus related congenital infection and microcephaly: Retrospective case series study. BMJ Online [Internet]. 2016;353 Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84964345444&doi=10.1136%2fbmj.i1901&partnerID=40&md5=2c66e63d65731eb21e8ad3d80fc48add

66 

ANHazin, APoretti, DDi Cavalcanti Souza Cruz, MTenorio, Avan der Linden, LJPena, et al Computed Tomographic Findings in Microcephaly Associated with Zika Virus. N Engl J Med. 2016 6 2;374(22):21935. 10.1056/NEJMc1603617

67 

PSDe Oliveira-Szejnfeld, DLevine, ASDe Oliveira Melo, MMRAmorim, AGMBatista, LChimelli, et al Congenital brain abnormalities and Zika virus: What the radiologist can expect to see prenatally and postnatally. Radiology. 2016;281(1):20318. 10.1148/radiol.2016161584

68 

MBesnard, DEyrolle-Guignot, PGuillemette-Artur, SLastere, FBost-Bezeaud, LMarcelis, et al Congenital cerebral malformations and dysfunction in fetuses and newborns following the 2013 to 2014 Zika virus epidemic in French Polynesia. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2016;21(13). 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.13.30181

69 

Vvan der Linden, ELRolim Filho, OGLins, Avan der Linden, M de FViana Vasco Aragao, AMBrainer-Lima, et al Congenital Zika syndrome with arthrogryposis: retrospective case series study. Bmj-Br Med J. 2016 8 9;354:i3899 10.1136/bmj.i3899

70 

ASDe Oliveira Melo, RSAguiar, MMRAmorim, MBArruda, FDe Oliveira Melo, STCRibeiro, et al Congenital Zika virus infection: Beyond neonatal microcephaly. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(12):140716. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3720

71 

Vvan der Linden, APessoa, WDobyns, AJBarkovich, H van der LJunior, ELRFilho, et al Description of 13 Infants Born During October 2015-January 2016 With Congenital Zika Virus Infection Without Microcephaly at Birth—Brazil. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 12 2;65(47):13438. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6547e2

72 

J.ESanín-Blair., CGutiérrez-Márquez., D.AHerrera., AVossough. Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Prenatal Zika Virus Infection. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;42(2):1537. 10.1159/000454860

73 

J.D.AMeneses., A.CIshigami., L.MDe Mello, L.LDe Albuquerque., C.A.ADe Brito., M.TCordeiro., et al Lessons Learned at the Epicenter of Brazil’s Congenital Zika Epidemic: Evidence from 87 Confirmed Cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(10):13028. 10.1093/cid/cix166

74 

MPFernandez, EParra Saad, MOspina Martinez, SCorchuelo, MMercado Reyes, MJHerrera, et al Ocular Histopathologic Features of Congenital Zika Syndrome. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 11 1;135(11):11639. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3595

75 

A.QSousa., D.I.MCavalcante., L.MFranco., F.M.CAraújo., E.TSousa., J.TValença-Junior, et al Postmortem findings for 7 neonates with congenital Zika virus infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(7):11647. 10.3201/eid2307.162019

76 

PGuillemette-Artur, MBesnard, DEyrolle-Guignot, J-MJouannic, CGarel. Prenatal brain MRI of fetuses with Zika virus infection. Pediatr Radiol. 2016 6;46(7):10329. 10.1007/s00247-016-3619-6

77 

MCCastro, QCHan, LRCarvalho, CGVictora, GVAFrança. Implications of Zika virus and congenital Zika syndrome for the number of live births in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018 6 12;115(24):617782. 10.1073/pnas.1718476115

78 

C.VVentura., MMaia., S.BTravassos., T.TMartins., FPatriota, M.ENunes., et al Risk factors associated with the ophthalmoscopic findings identified in infants with presumed zika virus congenital infection. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(8):9128. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1784

79 

MParra-Saavedra, JReefhuis, JPPiraquive, SMGilboa, MLBadell, CAMoore, et al Serial Head and Brain Imaging of 17 Fetuses With Confirmed Zika Virus Infection in Colombia, South America. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 7;130(1):20712. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002105

80 

MDel Campo, IMLFeitosa, EMRibeiro, DDGHorovitz, ALSPessoa, GVAFranca, et al The phenotypic spectrum of congenital Zika syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2017 4;173(4):84157. 10.1002/ajmg.a.38170

81 

LChimelli, ASOMelo, EAvvad-Portari, CAWiley, AHSCamacho, VSLopes, et al The spectrum of neuropathological changes associated with congenital Zika virus infection. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 2017 6;133(6):98399.

82 

BSchaub., MGueneret., EJolivet., VDecatrelle, SYazza., HGueye., et al Ultrasound imaging for identification of cerebral damage in congenital Zika virus syndrome: a case series. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2017;1(1):4555. 10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30001-9

83 

SMattar, COjeda, JArboleda, GArrieta, IBosch, IBotia, et al Case report: microcephaly associated with Zika virus infection, Colombia. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 6;17(1):423423. 10.1186/s12879-017-2522-6

84 

MCuljat, SEDarling, VRNerurkar, NChing, MKumar, SKMin, et al Clinical and Imaging Findings in an Infant With Zika Embryopathy. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 9 15;63(6):80511. 10.1093/cid/ciw324

85 

ASRSouza, MTCordeiro, JAMeneses, EHonorato, EAraujo Júnior, PMSCastanha, et al Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of congenital zika virus syndrome and diaphragmatic unilateral palsy: Case report. Rev Bras Saude Materno Infant. 2016;16(4):46773.

86 

SPerez, RTato, JJCabrera, ALopez, ORobles, EPaz, et al Confirmed case of Zika virus congenital infection, Spain, March 2016. Euro Surveill Bull Eur Sur Mal Transm Eur Commun Dis Bull. 2016 6 16;21(24).

87 

VVan der Linden, H van der JVan der Linden, M de CLeal, ELFRolim, A van derLinden, M de FVVAragao, et al Discordant clinical outcomes of congenital Zika virus infection in twin pregnancies. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2017 6;75(6):3816. 10.1590/0004-282X20170066

88 

ASSouza, CMDias, FDCBraojos Braga, ACBernardes Terzian, CFEstofolete, AHOliani, et al Fetal Infection by Zika Virus in the Third Trimester: Report of 2 Cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 12 15;63(12):16225. 10.1093/cid/ciw613

89 

G.AVorona., S.MLanni. Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of a 21-Week Fetus With Zika Virus Infection. Pediatr Neurol. 2016;65:989. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.07.014

90 

NZacharias, JWhitty, SNoblin, STsakiri, JGarcia, MCovinsky, et al First Neonatal Demise with Travel-Associated Zika Virus Infection in the United States of America. Ajp Rep. 2017 4;7(2):6873. 10.1055/s-0037-1601890

91 

HWerner, DSodre, CHygino, BGuedes, TFazecas, RNogueira, et al First-trimester intrauterine Zika virus infection and brain pathology: prenatal and postnatal neuroimaging findings. Prenat Diagn. 2016 8;36(8):7859. 10.1002/pd.4860

92 

Bde Paula Freitas., A.IKo., RKhouri., MMayoral., D.FHenriques., MMaia., et al Glaucoma and Congenital Zika Syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(3):4078. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.10.004

93 

A.FMoron., SCavalheiro., H.J.FMilani., S.G.PSarmento., CTanuri, F.Fde Souza., et al Microcephaly associated with maternal Zika virus infection. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(8):12659. 10.1111/1471-0528.14072

94 

MGLFrutos, JHOchoa, MGBarbás, HDLucchini, MMoya, GMalinger. New Insights into the Natural History of Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome Fetal Diagn Ther [Internet]. 2017;((M.GLovagnini Frutos.; J.HOchoa.; M.GBarbás.; H.DLucchini.; MMoya.; GMalinger.) aUniversity Maternity Hospital (HUMN), Córdoba National University, bDiagnus SA. Prenatal Diagnosis Center, and cCentral Laboratory Department, Ministry of Health, Córdoba, Argentina; dDivision of Ultrasound in Obstetrics&Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, eSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel). Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L618299728

95 

JAcosta-Reyes, ENavarro, MJHerrera, EGoenaga, MLOspina, EParra, et al Severe neurologic disorders in 2 fetuses with Zika virus infection, Colombia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(6):9824. 10.3201/eid2306.161702

96 

T.VVesnaver., NTul., SMehrabi., FParissone., PŠtrafela., JMlakar., et al Zika virus associated microcephaly/micrencephaly—fetal brain imaging in comparison with neuropathology. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;124(3):5215. 10.1111/1471-0528.14423

97 

MSarno, GASacramento, RKhouri, MSdo Rosario, FCosta, GArchanjo, et al Zika Virus Infection and Stillbirths: A Case of Hydrops Fetalis, Hydranencephaly and Fetal Demise. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 2;10(2):e0004517 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004517

98 

AOMelo, GMalinger, RXimenes, PSzejnfeld, SSampaio, B de FA.M.. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(1):67.

99 

XNorero Vega, ECastaño G, DEstripeaut C, XSáez-Llorens, OReyes, ABissot. Zika y defecto del tubo neural. Pediátr Panamá. 2016 4;45(1):235.

100 

JD VieiraCastro, LPPereira, DADias, LBAguiar, JCMaia, JIFCosta, et al Presumed Zika virus-related congenital brain malformations: the spectrum of CT and MRI findings in fetuses and newborns. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2017 10;75(10):70310. 10.1590/0004-282X20170134

101 

JSanin-Blair., ACumplido., JGutierrez-Marin., MCampo-Campo., RGarcia-Posada., ALondoño., et al Fetal ultrasound findings in zika infection. Preliminary report in a Colombian selected population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:1634. 10.3109/14767058.2014.991917

102 

ASRSouza, AIde Souza, Sde Lourdes Loreto Faquin, OGdos Santos Neto, EHonorato, AGLMattos, et al Altered intrauterine ultrasound, fetal head circumference growth and neonatal outcomes among suspected cases of congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil. Rev Bras Saude Materno Infant. 2016;16:S715.

103 

T.VVesnaver., NTul, JMlakar., SMehrabi., T.AZupanc., MPopović. Microcephaly caused by Zika virus—MRI of the fetal brain and correlation with neuropathology. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(1):S667.

104 

JDCragan. Baseline Prevalence of Birth Defects Associated with Congenital Zika Virus Infection—Massachusetts, North Carolina, and Atlanta, Georgia, 2013–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 17];66 Available from: https://www.facebook.com/CDCMMWR

105 

LPomar, MVouga, VLambert, CPomar, NHcini, AJolivet, et al Maternal-fetal transmission and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women infected with Zika virus: prospective cohort study in French Guiana. BMJ. 2018 10 31;k4431 10.1136/bmj.k4431

106 

CRodó, ASuy, ESulleiro, ASoriano-Arandes, NMaiz, IGarcía-Ruiz, et al Pregnancy outcomes after maternal Zika virus infection in a non-endemic region: prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 5 1;25(5):633.e5633.e9.

107 

OJBrady, AOsgood-Zimmerman, NJKassebaum, SERay, VEMde Araújo, AAda Nóbrega, et al The association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly in Brazil 2015–2017: An observational analysis of over 4 million births. PLoS Med [Internet]. 2019 3 5 [cited 2019 Nov 18];16(3). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6400331/ 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002755

108 

JKMorris, JRankin, EGarne, MLoane, RGreenlees, M-CAddor, et al Prevalence of microcephaly in Europe: population based study. BMJ. 2016 9;354:i4721i4721. 10.1136/bmj.i4721

109 

LWAverill, VVRKandula, YAkyol, MEpelman. Fetal Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings In Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection With Postnatal Imaging Correlation. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2015 12;36(6):47686. 10.1053/j.sult.2015.04.001

110 

HParmar, MIbrahim. Pediatric Intracranial Infections. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2012 11;22(4):70725. 10.1016/j.nic.2012.05.016

111 

DLevine., J.CJani., ICastro-Aragon., MCannie. How does imaging of congenital zika compare with imaging of other to rch infections? Radiology. 2017;285(3):74461. 10.1148/radiol.2017171238

112 

RLa Piana, CUggetti, FRoncarolo, AVanderver, IOlivieri, DTonduti, et al Neuroradiologic patterns and novel imaging findings in Aicardi-Goutières syndrome. Neurology. 2016 1 5;86(1):2835. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002228

113 

VVan der Linden, LPetribu NC de, APessoa, IFaquini, ARPaciorkowski, Linden H van der, et al Association of Severe Hydrocephalus With Congenital Zika Syndrome. JAMA Neurol. 2019 2 1;76(2):20310. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3553

114 

JDCherry. Cutaneous manifestations of infectious diseases In: J DCherry, G JHarrison, S LKaplan, P JHotez, & W JSteinbach eds Feigin and Cherry’s textbook of pediatric infectious diseases. 7th ed Philaderphia: Elsevier-Sanders; 2014 p. 74168.

115 

RMSimeone, CKShapiro-Mendoza, DMeaney-Delman, EEPetersen, RRGalang, TOduyebo, et al Possible Zika Virus Infection Among Pregnant Women—United States and Territories, May 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 5 27;65(20):5149. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6520e1

116 

CAMoore, JEStaples, WBDobyns, APessoa, CVVentura, EBda Fonseca, et al Congenital Zika Syndrome: Characterizing the Pattern of Anomalies for Pediatric Healthcare Providers. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 3 1;171(3):28895. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3982

117 

CCoyne.B., Lazear H.M. Zika virus-reigniting the TORCH. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(11):70715. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.125

118 

AJNahmias, KWWalls, StewartJohn A, KLHerrmannJr, WJF. The ToRCH complex-perinatal infections associated with toxoplasma and rubella, cytomegol- and herpes simplex viruses. Pediatr Res. 1971 8;5(8):4056.

119 

ASalt, JSargent. Common visual problems in children with disability. Arch Dis Child. 2014 12 1;99(12):11638. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305267

120 

C.AMoore., J.EStaples., W.BDobyns., APessoa., C.VVentura., E.BDa Fonseca., et al Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):28895. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3982

121 

MZare Mehrjardi, APoretti, TAGMHuisman, HWerner, EKeshavarz, EAraujo Junior. Neuroimaging findings of congenital Zika virus infection: a pictorial essay. Jpn J Radiol. 2017 3;35(3):8994. 10.1007/s11604-016-0609-4

122 

ITsui, MELMoreira, JDRossetto, ZVasconcelos, SLGaw, LMNeves, et al Eye Findings in Infants With Suspected or Confirmed Antenatal Zika Virus Exposure. Pediatrics [Internet]. 2018 10 [cited 2020 Feb 15];142(4). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6317824/

123 

ITsui, LMNeves, KAdachi, SLGaw, JPPereira, PBrasil, et al Overlapping Spectrum of Retinochoroidal Scarring in Congenital Zika Virus and Toxoplasmosis Infections. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019 12 1;50(12):77984. 10.3928/23258160-20191119-05

124 

MGCapretti, CMarsico, SGuidelli Guidi, ACiardella, GSimonazzi, SGalletti, et al Neonatal and long-term ophthalmological findings in infants with symptomatic and asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Clin Virol. 2017 12 1;97:5963. 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.11.001

125 

CJLyons, SRLambert. Taylor and Hoyt’s Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016. 1181 p.

126 

JJAdibi, ETAJMarques, ACartus, RHBeigi. Teratogenic effects of the Zika virus and the role of the placenta. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016 4 9;387(10027):158790. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00650-4

127 

FRCugola, IRFernandes, FBRusso, BCFreitas, JLMDias, KPGuimarães, et al The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature. 2016;534(7606):26771. 10.1038/nature18296

128 

BLiang, JPGuida, MLCosta, IUMysorekar. Host and viral mechanisms of congenital Zika syndrome. Virulence. 2019 1 1;10(1):76875. 10.1080/21505594.2019.1656503

129 

C.KShapiro-Mendoza., M.ERice., R.RGalang, A.CFulton., KVanMaldeghem., M.VPrado., et al Pregnancy Outcomes After Maternal Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy—U.S. Territories, January 1, 2016-April 25, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(23):61521. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6623e1

130 

SCauchemez, MBesnard, PBompard, TDub, PGuillemette-Artur, DEyrolle-Guignot, et al Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013–15: a retrospective study. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016 5 21;387(10033):212532. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00651-6

131 

BHoen, BSchaub, ALFunk, VArdillon, MBoullard, ACabié, et al Pregnancy Outcomes after ZIKV Infection in French Territories in the Americas. N Engl J Med. 2018 3 15;378(11):98594. 10.1056/NEJMoa1709481

132 

GPLima, DRozenbaum, CPimentel, ACCFrota, DVivacqua, ESMachado, et al Factors associated with the development of Congenital Zika Syndrome: a case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 3 22;19(1):277 10.1186/s12879-019-3908-4

133 

K-LPool, KAdachi, SKarnezis, NSalamon, TRomero, KNielsen-Saines, et al Association Between Neonatal Neuroimaging and Clinical Outcomes in Zika-Exposed Infants From Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 7 3;2(7):e198124e198124. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8124

134 

E.LCuevas., V.TTong., NRozo., DValencia., OPacheco., S.MGilboa., et al Preliminary Report of Microcephaly Potentially Associated with Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy—Colombia, January-November 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(49):140913. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6549e1

135 

GVAFranca, LSchuler-Faccini, WKOliveira, CMPHenriques, EHCarmo, VDPedi, et al Congenital Zika virus syndrome in Brazil: a case series of the first 1501 livebirths with complete investigation. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016 8 27;388(10047):8917. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30902-3

136 

U-AHalai, KNielsen-Saines, MLMoreira, PCde Sequeira, JPJPereira, AZin A de, et al Maternal Zika Virus Disease Severity, Virus Load, Prior Dengue Antibodies, and Their Relationship to Birth Outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 9 15;65(6):87783. 10.1093/cid/cix472

137 

L-MHuang. How can we deal with Zika virus infection? J Formos Med Assoc Taiwan Yi Zhi. 2016 4;115(4):2212. 10.1016/j.jfma.2016.03.001

138 

ZMolnar, SKennedy. Risks of Zika virus during the first trimester of pregnancy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016 6;12(6):315U13. 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.71

139 

MRReynolds, AMJones, EEPetersen, EHLee, MERice, ABingham, et al Vital Signs: Update on Zika Virus-Associated Birth Defects and Evaluation of All U.S. Infants with Congenital Zika Virus Exposure—U.S. Zika Pregnancy Registry, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 4 7;66(13):36673. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6613e1

140 

THSanta Rita, RBBarra, GPPeixoto, PGMesquita, GBBarra. Association between suspected Zika virus disease during pregnancy and giving birth to a newborn with congenital microcephaly: A matched case-control study. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 2017;10(1). Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85028940762&doi=10.1186%2fs13104-017-2796-1&partnerID=40&md5=2159741163da422abe8173ec65521ec6

141 

LSchuler-Faccini, EMRibeiro, IMLFeitosa, DDGHorovitz, DPCavalcanti, APessoa, et al Possible Association Between Zika Virus Infection and Microcephaly—Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 1 29;65(3):5962. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6503e2

142 

SBMulkey, DIBulas, GVezina, YFourzali, AMorales, MArroyave-Wessel, et al Sequential Neuroimaging of the Fetus and Newborn With In Utero Zika Virus Exposure. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 01;173(1):529. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4138

143 

BGRibeiro, HWerner, FPPLLopes, da Cruz LCHygino, TMFazecas, PANDaltro, et al Central Nervous System Effects of Intrauterine Zika Virus Infection: A Pictorial Review. RadioGraphics. 2017 Oct 1;37(6):184050. 10.1148/rg.2017170023

144 

RCarvalho-Sauer, CNCosta M da, FRBarreto, MGTeixeira. Congenital Zika Syndrome: Prevalence of low birth weight and associated factors. Bahia, 2015–2017. Int J Infect Dis. 2019 5 1;82:4450. 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.02.040

145 

AAMoura da Silva, JSSantos Ganz, SSousa P da, MJRodovalho Doriqui, MRCosta Ribeiro, M dos RFreitas Carvalho Branco, et al Early Growth and Neurologic Outcomes of Infants with Probable Congenital Zika Virus Syndrome. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 11;22(11):19536. 10.3201/eid2211.160956

146 

WEVillamil-Gómez, DPadilla-Ruiz, AMendoza, ÁÁlvarez, OBaldrich-Gomez, HPosso, et al Urinary bladder agenesis and renal hypoplasia potentially related to in utero Zika virus infection. Int J Infect Dis. 2019 8 1;85:546. 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.05.021

147 

LMCosta Monteiro, OCruz GN de, JMFontes, GFde Araujo, TVentura, ACMonteiro, et al Neurogenic bladder in the settings of congenital Zika syndrome: a confirmed and unknown condition for urologists. J Pediatr Urol [Internet]. 2019 4 [cited 2019 Nov 4]; Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1477513119300907

148 

AAngelidou, ZMichael, AHotz, KFriedman, SEmani, KLaRovere, et al Is There More to Zika? Complex Cardiac Disease in a Case of Congenital Zika Syndrome. Neonatology. 2018;113(2):17782. 10.1159/000484656

149 

DDCavalcanti, LVAlves, GJFurtado, CCSantos, FGFeitosa, MCRibeiro, et al Echocardiographic findings in infants with presumed congenital Zika syndrome: Retrospective case series study. PloS One. 2017;12(4):e0175065 10.1371/journal.pone.0175065

150 

DHGOrofino, SRLPassos, RVCde Oliveira, CVBFarias, FMPLeite M de, SMPone, et al Cardiac findings in infants with in utero exposure to Zika virus- a cross sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis [Internet]. 2018 3 26 [cited 2019 Nov 6];12(3). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886696/ 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006362

151 

MBSantana, CCLamas, JGAthayde, GCalvet, JMoreira, ADe Lorenzo. Congenital Zika syndrome: is the heart part of its spectrum? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 8;25(8):10434. 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.020

152 

MCLeal, LFMuniz, TSAFerreira, CMSantos, LCAlmeida, VVan Der Linden, et al Hearing Loss in Infants with Microcephaly and Evidence of Congenital Zika Virus Infection—Brazil, November 2015-May 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 9 2;65(34):9179. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6534e3

153 

APessoa, Vvan der Linden, MYeargin-Allsopp, MDCGCarvalho, EMRibeiro, KVan Naarden Braun, et al Motor Abnormalities and Epilepsy in Infants and Children With Evidence of Congenital Zika Virus Infection. Pediatrics. 2018 2;141(Suppl 2):S16779. 10.1542/peds.2017-2038F

154 

JBhatnagar, DBRabeneck, RBMartines, SReagan-Steiner, YErmias, LBCEstetter, et al Zika Virus RNA Replication and Persistence in Brain and Placental Tissue. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 3;23(3):40514. 10.3201/eid2303.161499

155 

AMelo, GLGama, RADa Silva Júnior, PLDe Assunção, JSTavares, MBDa Silva, et al Motor function in children with congenital Zika syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol [Internet]. 2019 4 4 [cited 2019 Nov 4]; Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/dmcn.14227

156 

ASatterfield-Nash. Health and Development at Age 19–24 Months of 19 Children Who Were Born with Microcephaly and Laboratory Evidence of Congenital Zika Virus Infection During the 2015 Zika Virus Outbreak—Brazil, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Nov 2];66 Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/mm6649a2.htm

157 

CFlamand, CFritzell, SMatheus, MDueymes, GCarles, AFavre, et al The proportion of asymptomatic infections and spectrum of disease among pregnant women infected by Zika virus: systematic monitoring in French Guiana, 2016. Eurosurveillance [Internet]. 2017 11 2 [cited 2019 Nov 19];22(44). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710134/ 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.44.17-00102

158 

WHO. COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES WITH CURRENT OR PREVIOUS ZIKA VIRUS TRANSMISSION [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/zika/countries-with-zika-and-vectors-table.pdf

159 

NLAchee, FGould, TAPerkins, RCRJr, ACMorrison, SARitchie, et al A Critical Assessment of Vector Control for Dengue Prevention. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 5 7;9(5):e0003655 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003655

160 

THAnt, CSHerd, VGeoghegan, AAHoffmann, SPSinkins. The Wolbachia strain wAu provides highly efficient virus transmission blocking in Aedes aegypti. PLOS Pathog. 2018 1 25;14(1):e1006815 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006815

161 

ACaprara, JWDe Oliveira Lima, ACRocha Peixoto, CMVasconcelos Motta, JMSoares Nobre, JSommerfeld, et al Entomological impact and social participation in dengue control: a cluster randomized trial in Fortaleza, Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 2;109(2):99105. 10.1093/trstmh/tru187

162 

RCRJr, NAchee, RBarrera, TRBurkot, DDChadee, GJDevine, et al Quantifying the Epidemiological Impact of Vector Control on Dengue. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 5 26;10(5):e0004588 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004588

163 

JQuintero, HBrochero, PManrique-Saide, MBarrera-Pérez, CBasso, SRomero, et al Ecological, biological and social dimensions of dengue vector breeding in five urban settings of Latin America: a multi-country study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014 1 21;14:38 10.1186/1471-2334-14-38

164 

WHO, editor. Handbook for integrated vector management. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. 68 p.

165 

MVouga, Y-CChiu, LPomar, SVde Meyer, SMasmejan, BGenton, et al Dengue, Zika and chikungunya during pregnancy: pre- and post-travel advice and clinical management. J Travel Med [Internet]. 2019 10 16 [cited 2020 Oct 14];26(8). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6927317/

166 

MAPOliveira, GCVelarde. Entendendo a pesquisa clínica V: relatos e séries de casos. 2015;4.