Nature Communications
Home Photocatalytic three-component asymmetric sulfonylation via direct C(sp3)-H functionalization
Photocatalytic three-component asymmetric sulfonylation via direct C(sp<sup>3</sup>)-H functionalization
Photocatalytic three-component asymmetric sulfonylation via direct C(sp3)-H functionalization

Article Type: Research Article Article History
  • Altmetric
Abstract

The direct and selective C(sp3)-H functionalization of cycloalkanes and alkanes is a highly useful process in organic synthesis owing to the low-cost starting materials, the high step and atom economy. Its application to asymmetric catalysis, however, has been scarcely explored. Herein, we disclose our effort toward this goal by incorporation of dual asymmetric photocatalysis by a chiral nickel catalyst and a commercially available organophotocatalyst with a radical relay strategy through sulfur dioxide insertion. Such design leads to the development of three-component asymmetric sulfonylation involving direct functionalization of cycloalkanes, alkanes, toluene derivatives or ethers. The photochemical reaction of a C(sp3)-H precursor, a SO2 surrogate and a common α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound proceeds smoothly under mild conditions, delivering a wide range of biologically interesting α-C chiral sulfones with high regio- and enantioselectivity (>50 examples, up to >50:1 rr and 95% ee). This method is applicable to late-stage functionalization of bioactive molecules, and provides an appealing access to enantioenriched compounds starting from the abundant hydrocarbon compounds.

The direct and selective C(sp3)-H functionalization of cycloalkanes and alkanes is useful in organic synthesis but its application to asymmetric catalysis has been less explored. Here, the authors demonstrate the incorporation of a dual asymmetric photocatalyst which leads to the development of asymmetric sulfonylation involving direct functionalization of cycloalkanes, alkanes, toluene derivatives or ethers.

Keywords
Cao,Hong,Ye,and Gong: Photocatalytic three-component asymmetric sulfonylation via direct C(sp3)-H functionalization

Introduction

Chiral sulfones are building blocks found in many biologically active compounds and drugs1, and sulfones bearing stereocenters at the α-position or β-position have shown great potential in pharmaceutical and clinical applications (Fig. 1a)24. For example, remikiren is a renin inhibitor used for the treatment of hypertension5, apremilast has been approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an oral drug to treat active psoriatic arthritis and plaque psoriasis6. Chiral sulfones play important roles in organic synthesis as auxiliaries, ligands, and synthetic intermediates7,8. Great efforts have been devoted to the development of the practical synthesis of enantioenriched sulfones9. However, there are few asymmetric catalytic approaches to chiral sulfones with α-carbon stereocenters, and those typically rely on noble-metal-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation. Neighboring sulfonyl groups have the potential to stimulate racemization of the non-quaternary stereocenters, thereby synthetic approaches to such compounds which can be performed under mild conditions are strongly desired1014.

Overview of this work.
Fig. 1

Overview of this work.

a Bioactive molecules or natural products containing α-C chiral sulfone units. b Challenges of direct C(sp3)-H functionalization of cycloalkanes and alkanes. c This work: photocatalytic three-component sulfonylation via direct C(sp3)-H functionalization of cycloalkanes and alkanes. BDEs, bond dissociation energies; rr, regioisomeric ratio; ee, enantiomeric excess; PC, photocatalyst; Z, auxiliary group.

The direct C(sp3)-H functionalization of cycloalkanes and alkanes is a highly useful process due to the low-cost starting materials, the high step, and atom economy (Fig. 1b)15,16. Methods to control site-selectivity towards C-H bonds at the specific positions of unactivated cycloalkanes or alkanes (without the assistance of any directing group)1730, at the same time combine with asymmetric catalysis, provide appealing opportunities for the construction of high value-added chiral molecules, but remains a remarkable challenge31. In this context, rhodium-carbene-induced C–H insertion has emerged as an elegant strategy for alkylation of primary, secondary, ternary alkanes, and cycloalkanes, in which chiral dirhodium catalysts with well-designed and tailored ligands are employed for both site recognition and asymmetric induction3237.

Recently, we found a photocatalytic enantioselective alkylation reaction of N-sulfonylimines with benzylic or alkyl C(sp3)-H precursors enabled by copper-based asymmetric catalysis and organophotocatalysis. This radical-mediated method however relies on very specific reaction partners and is extremely ineffective for conversions of cycloalkanes38. Practical methods which can be applied to common substrates are still undeveloped. To achieve this goal, suppression of the side reactions such as self-coupling or elimination of radical intermediates and powerful stereocontrol in the radical process is required. Sulfur dioxide and its surrogates have been recognized as useful acceptors for alkyl or aryl radicals in many thermal and photochemical reactions3946. The resulting sulfonyl radicals have a longer life time which might be beneficial for asymmetric induction47. Hence, we questioned whether incorporation of sulfur dioxide insertion with appropriate dual asymmetric photocatalysis4851 would allow us to find an effective approach for stereoselective transformations starting from most abundant hydrocarbon compounds. On the basis of these considerations, a photocatalytic asymmetric three-component sulfonylation reaction of a cycloalkane (an alkane, a toluene derivative, or an ether), an SO2 surrogate, and a common Michael acceptor was developed, whose stereochemistry was governed by a nickel catalyst of a well-tailored chiral bisoxazoline ligand. This method provides straightforward and economic access to biologically interesting α-C chiral sulfones (>50 examples, up to 50:1 rr and 95% ee, Fig. 1c).

Results

Reaction development

α,β-Unsaturated carbonyl compounds are one class of common Michael acceptors in organic synthesis. Initially, we chose cyclohexane (1a) as the model substrate, α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound bearing an N-acylpyrazole moiety (2a) as the reaction partner, 5,7,12,14-pentacenetetrone (PC1) as the hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) photocatalyst38,52, and the bisoxazoline nickel complex generated in situ ([L1-Ni]) as the chiral catalyst (Table 1). The reaction of 1a and 2a failed to produce an additional product under visible light conditions (entry 1). We next tested several SO2 surrogates in the photochemical system and found that 1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane-1,4-diium-1,4-disulfinate (DABCO ∙ (SO2)2) was the appropriate reaction component (entries 2,3). Under irradiation with a 24 W blue LEDs lamp (λmax = 455 nm) at 20°C under argon, the reaction of 1a, 2a, and DABCO ∙ (SO2)2 in dichloroethane delivered the chiral sulfone product (3a) in 58% conversion and with only 3% ee (entry 3). α,β-Unsaturated carbonyl substrates bearing a different auxiliary group (Z) were examined, and it was found that N-acylpyrazole (2a) was a suitable substrate (entries 4–7). Other photocatalysts (PC2PC4) failed to catalyze this transformation (entries 8–10). In order to improve the reaction efficiency and enantioselectivity, a range of chiral ligands (L2L11) were screened (entries 11–20). Chiral bis(oxazoline) ligands (L2L4) and a tridentate ligand (L5), which have been successfully used for asymmetric induction in some radical-mediated transformations5356, were found to be ineffective in this photocatalytic reaction (entries 11–14), but replacement of L1 with an indane-derived BOX ligand (L6) led to full conversion and significantly increased enantiomeric excess (82% ee) (entry 15). Based on this observation, we modified this type of ligands and synthesized several sterically more bulky analogs for the creation of a more precise chiral environment (L7L9). One of these, L7 was identified as the best ligand with regard to the yield and enantioselectivity (86% ee) (entry 16). Finally, the reaction was further improved by reducing the reaction temperature and increasing the loading of chiral catalyst, which provided 3a with a full conversion and 95% ee (entry 23). The reaction with only 1.0 equiv. of cyclohexane also proceeded smoothly at a lower but reasonable reaction rate (52% conversion within 96 h) and similar enantioselectivity of 93% ee (entry 24). Such conditions would be useful with more expensive C(sp3)-H precursors such as natural products or drug molecules.

Table 1
Optimization of reaction conditionsa.
EntryMetal saltLigandPCSO2 surrogatesSubstrateT (°C)ProductConv. (%)bEe (%)c
1Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC1none2a200n.a.
2Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC1Na2S2O52a203a0n.a.
3Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a583
4Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22b203b0n.a.
5Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22c203c0n.a.
6Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22d203d0n.a.
7Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22e203e0n.a.
8Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC2DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a0n.a.
9Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC3DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a0n.a.
10Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL1PC4DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a0n.a.
11Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL2PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a4713
12Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL3PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a5311
13Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL4PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a4921
14Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL5PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a3711
15Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL6PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203aquant.82
16Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL7PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203aquant.86
17Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL8PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a9084
18Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL9PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203a8586
19Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL10PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203aquant.82
20Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL11PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a203aquant.79
21Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL7PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a03a7795
22Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL7PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a−203a4795
23dNi(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL7PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a03aquant.95
24eNi(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2OL7PC1DABCO ∙ (SO2)22a03a5293

Reaction scope investigation

With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we investigated the substrate scope of this photocatalytic asymmetric three-component sulfonylation reaction (Fig. 2). It was revealed that unsubstituted cycloalkanes such as cyclohexane (1a), cyclopentane (1b), cycloheptane (1c), cyclooctane (1d), and cyclododecane (1e) were excellent substrates, delivering the chiral sulfone products (3a3e) in 62–74% yield and with 91–95% ee. A trisubstituted cycloalkane, 1,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane (1f) exhibited high regioselectivity towards the tertiary C(sp3)-H bonds (>50:1 rr) and provided lower enantioselectivity (78% ee). The observation of high regioselectivity was consistent with an inherent difference of bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of secondary and tertiary C(sp3)-H bonds, as well as stability of the corresponding carbon radicals. The crystal structure of product 3b revealed the absolute configuration (R) of the major enantiomer, and the absolute configuration of the other products was assigned accordingly. Adamantane has a significantly higher 3° C(sp3)-H bond dissociation energy of 99 kcal mol-1 caused by its rigid cage structure, which exceeds the bond dissociation energy of its 2° C(sp3)-H bonds (96 kcal mol-1) and those of most other hydrocarbons57. The unusually strong tertiary C(sp3)-H bonds of adamantine-type compounds present a remarkable challenge to their selective tertiary C-H functionalization58, but such transformations proceeded very well in our photochemical system. Adamantane (1g), 1-methyladamantane (1h), 1-ethyladamantane (1i), and 1,3-dimethyladamantane (1j) were all selectively functionalized at the tertiary C(sp3)-H position, affording the products (3g3j) as single regioisomers with 8490% ee. These results indicate that the catalyst-control also plays a crucial role in the selectivity in addition to the inherent difference of bond dissociation energies and carbon radical stabilities. The reaction exhibited high functional group compatibility, which would be desirable for its synthetic application to structurally diverse compounds. For example, adamantine derivatives bearing a fluoro- (1k), chloro- (1l), bromo- (1m), cyano- (1n), ester- (1o), keto- (1p), or hydroxyl- (1q) substituent all provided a reasonable yield (59–71%), perfect regioselectivity (>50:1), and satisfactory enantioselectivity (82–91%). Moreover, the photochemical reactions of tertiary alkanes also proceeded smoothly under the standard conditions and delivered the desired chiral sulfones (3r3u) as exclusive regioisomers with 75–82% ee.

Reaction scope of C(sp3)-H precursors including cycloalkanes, alkanes, toluene derivatives, and ethers.
Fig. 2

Reaction scope of C(sp3)-H precursors including cycloalkanes, alkanes, toluene derivatives, and ethers.

aReaction performed in the presence of alkanes (20 equiv.). bReaction performed at 20 °C. PC, photocatalyst; Z, auxiliary group.

To further investigate the generality of this method, other C(sp3)-H precursors were examined. The reaction with toluene and its derivatives was more rapid than those of cycloalkanes and alkanes. The primary (1v1z), secondary (1za1ze), and tertiary benzylic hydrocarbons (1zf–1zh) all worked well and delivered the chiral products (3v3zh) in 58–75% yield and with 62–94% ee. Sterically more demanding substrates such as diphenylmethane (1zc) and cyclohexylbenzene (1zg) tended to give lower enantioselectivity. The reactions of toluene derivatives containing completing reactive sites displayed some degree of regioselectivity. For example, p-isopropyl toluene (1zh) provided very moderate regioselectivity of 1.5:1, while 1-(p-tolyl)adamantine bearing benzylic C(sp3)-H bonds, secondary and tertiary C(sp3)-H bonds in the admantyl moiety (1zi) afforded a single regioisomer with the benzylic functionalization. It was found that heteroaromatic α-C(sp3)-H precursors such as 3-methylthiophene (1zj), 2-methylthiophene (1zk), 3-methylbenzothiophene (1zl), and 3-methylbenzofuran (1zm) were compatible with the reaction and gave products with 76–88% ee. Interestingly, ethers such as tetrahydrofuran (1zn) and methyl tert-butyl ether (1zo), which have strong α-C(sp3)-H bonds (BDEs = ~92 kcal mol-1)59, were also identified as excellent substrates by the yields (55–73%) and enantioselectivities (80–92% ee).

We next evaluated the scope of α,β-unsaturated N-acylpyrazoles. As summarized in Fig. 3, β-substituents including a linear alkyl group (products 3zp3zr), a branched alkyl group (products 3zs, 3zt), a cylcoalkyl group (product 3zu), and an aryl substituent (products 3zv3zy) were all compatible with regards to yields (53–71%) and enantioselectivity (64–93% ee). Typically, β-alkyl-substituted substrates gave better enantioselectivity in comparison to those containing a β-aryl group, perhaps due to the trend of Z/E isomerization of the latter under photochemical conditions60. For example, in the reaction of 1a + DABCO ∙ (SO2)2 + 2l → 3zv, 28% of Z-isomer of 2l was isolated (see more details in Supplementary Fig. 5). Such byproducts were not observed in the conversions of β-alkyl α,β-unsaturated N-acylpyrazoles.

Reaction scope of α,β-unsaturated N-acylpyrazoles.
Fig. 3

Reaction scope of α,β-unsaturated N-acylpyrazoles.

aReaction performed at a lower concentration and with a modified substrate ratio, see more details in Supplementary Fig. 1. PC, photocatalyst; Z, auxiliary group.

Mechanistic studies

Several control experiments were conducted to gain insight into the reaction mechanism (Fig. 4). For example, the addition of a radical quencher (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl, TEMPO, 3 equiv.) to the photochemical reaction 1v + DABCO ∙ (SO2)2 + 2a → 3v was found to completely inhibit the transformation to 3v, instead of affording a TEMPO-carbon radical cross-coupling product (4) detected by HRMS analysis. The three-component sulfonylation reaction of 4-(cyclopropylmethyl)-1,1’-biphenyl (1zp) under the standard conditions provided a ring-opened product (5) in 63% yield and with 95% ee, which further confirmed the reaction pathway via benzylic radicals. Employing cyclopropyl-substituted N-acylpyrazole (2p) as a substrate for the radical clock experiment provided product 6 in 65% yield and did not give any ring-opened product, thus excluding mechanisms involving the β-carbon radicals of N-acylpyrazole complexes61. The reaction of 2a with sodium cyclopentanesulfinate was examined under the standard conditions and failed to produce any desired product 3b (Fig. 4b). This result indicated that the reaction might not proceed through sulfonyl anion intermediates. Moreover, removal of the nickel catalyst in the reaction of 1v + DABCO ∙ (SO2)2 + 2a → 3v led to the failure of product formation, while replacing the nickel catalyst with other Lewis acids such as a copper, zinc, iron, or cobalt complex of the same chiral ligand (L7) still afforded product 3v in a moderate yield (17 − 31%). The cobalt complex with a similar octahedral configuration even gave good enantioselectivity of 80% (Fig. 4c). These results suggested that the nickel complex most likely only provided Lewis acid activation for α,β-unsaturated N-acylpyrazoles. Finally, luminescence quenching experiments revealed that the C(sp3)-H precursors such as toluene (1v) were capable of quenching the excited state of PC1 and initiating the radical process (Fig. 4d).

Control experiments.
Fig. 4

Control experiments.

a Probing of carbon radical pathways. b Probing of sulfonyl anion pathways. c Reactions by other Lewis acids. d Luminescence quenching experiments. DABCO ∙ (SO2)2, 1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane-1,4-diium-1,4-disulfinate; TEMPO, 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl; PC, photocatalyst; equiv., equivalent; conv., conversion; n.a., not applicable.

Mechanistic proposal

On the basis of the initial experiments and mechanistic studies, we propose a plausible reaction mechanism (Fig. 5a). The chiral nickel catalyst ([L*-Ni]) undergoes fast ligand exchange with the α,β-unsaturated N-acylpyrazole (2) to generate an intermediate complex (A). On the other hand, the organophotocatalyst (PC) is excited to its triplet state (B), which performs hydrogen atom abstraction from the C(sp3)-H precursor (1) to give the semiquinone-type radical intermediate (C) and the transient carbon radical (D)52. The radical (D) is rapidly trapped by the sulfur dioxide released in situ to produce the stabilized sulfonyl radical (E)41. Owing to the electronic and steric effects, E reacts with the metal-coordinated Michael acceptor (A) through an outer-sphere rather than an inner-sphere pathway, affording the radical complex (F)60,6266. Such an outer-sphere attack might be critical to avoid side reactions such as self-coupling or elimination and to achieve a high level of asymmetric induction in the photochemical reaction6780. Subsequent single electron transfer and proton transfer among intermediates C, F and a small amount of water in the solution lead to the formation of the neutral complex (G) and the organophotocatalyst (PC). Ultimately, ligand exchange between intermediate G and the substrate (2) gives the chiral sulfone product (3) and regenerates the coordinated α,β-unsaturated N-acylpyrazole (A). Besides, a pathway involving DABCO-participated reductive quench cannot be excluded (see more details in the Supplementary Fig. 12)58.

Proposed reaction mechanism.
Fig. 5

Proposed reaction mechanism.

a Proposed catalytic cycles. b Left: a crystal structure of chiral nickel complex [L6-Ni] (CCDC no. 2054187). Middle: a transition state ([L7-Ni-2a] with sulfonyl radical), simulated by Gaussian 09, and drawn by CYLview 1.0. Right: a crystal structure of product 3b (CCDC no. 2028396). PC, photocatalyst; DABCO ∙ (SO2)2, 1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane-1,4-diium-1,4-disulfinate; SET, single electron transfer; HAT, hydrogen atom transfer.

A crystal structure of the nickel complex [L6-Ni] exhibits an octahedral geometry, in which the six coordination sites are occupied by one chiral ligand and four water molecules (Fig. 5b, left). Accordingly, an intermediate [L7-Ni-2a] is simulated by Gaussian 09, and a proposed transition state is modeled by CYLview 1.0 (Fig. 5b, middle)81. The sulfonyl radical (E) interacts with the C=C double bond of the coordinated α,β-unsaturated N-acylpyrazole from Re-face with less steric hindrance, which is consistent with an observed R-configuration in product 3b (Fig. 5b, right). The modeled transition state structure also illustrated that the extended phenyl substituents on the chiral ligand (L7) were critical for a high level of asymmetric induction.

Synthetic utility

A mmol-scale reaction was performed to demonstrate the synthetic utility of the reaction. A mixture of toluene (1v, 533 μL, 5.0 mmol), 2a (164 mg, 1.0 mmol) and DABCO ∙ (SO2)2 (180 mg, 0.75 mmol) was irradiated with a blue LEDs lamp under the standard conditions (Fig. 6a), leading to the production of 227 mg of 3v (71% yield, 91% ee). The yield and enantioselectivity were basically the same as in the small-scale reaction. Next, we investigated further transformations of the reaction product. For example, an alcohol derivative (7) was obtained in 93% yield and with 91% ee by treatment of the chiral sulfone (3v, 91% ee) with NaBH4 in a mixed solvent of tetrahydrofuran (THF) and H2O at 0 °C to room temperature. 3v could also be converted into the corresponding ester (8) or amide (9) in good yield and with retention of enantiomeric excess by substitution of the pyrazole moiety with an ethoxy or an amino group, respectively (Fig. 6b). Finally, the photochemical reaction was applied to the late-stage modification of bioactive molecules (Fig. 6c). Under the standard conditions, the reaction of a lopid derivative afforded its chiral sulfone derivative (10) as a single regioisomer in 64% yield and with 86% ee. The product was identified by 1H-NOESY NMR, suggesting that the orth-methyl group was selectively functionalized. We assumed that the excellent site-selectivity towards the C(sp3)-H at the orth-position might be attributed to neighboring electronic effects of the heteroatom (oxygen) and its coordination ability to the nickel catalyst. Such precise recognition of two very similar benzylic C(sp3)-H bonds further confirmed the powerful catalyst-control of selectivity in the photochemical reaction. Using a similar protocol, celestolide and a synthetic intermediate of differin could be converted to the corresponding sulfone products 11 and 12 with excellent regioselectivity and high enantioselecitivity, respectively.

Synthetic utility of this method.
Fig. 6

Synthetic utility of this method.

a A mmol-scale photocatalytic reaction. b Transformations of chiral sulfone product 3v. c Late-stage modification of bioactive molecules. PC, photocatalyst; DABCO ∙ (SO2)2, 1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane-1,4-diium-1,4-disulfinate; THF, tetrahydrofuran; TsOH, 4-Toluenesulfonic acid; RT, room temperature.

Discussion

In summary, we have developed an effective protocol for asymmetric sulfonylation reactions through direct C(sp3)-H functionalization of cycloalkanes, alkanes, toluene derivatives, or ethers. The three-component reaction among an inert C(sp3)-H precursor, an SO2 surrogate (DABCO ∙ (SO2)2), and a common Michael acceptor (α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compound) is enabled by dual organophotocatalysis and nickel-based asymmetric catalysis. A number of biologically interesting enantioenriched α-C sulfones are obtained with high selectivity under mild conditions (> 50 examples, up to 50:1 rr and 95% ee). The SO2 surrogate provides radical stabilization access for suppression of the side reactions and perhaps being beneficial for stereocontrol in the photochemical reaction. We believe that it would provide an appealing opportunity to develop valuable asymmetric transformations starting from the abundant hydrocarbon compounds.

Methods

Preparation of a solution of the non-racemic nickel catalyst [L7-Ni] in dichloroethane

A solution of Ni(ClO4)2 ∙ 6H2O (11.0 mg, 0.030 mmol) and non-racemic ligand L7 (18.4 mg, 0.036 mmol) in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME, 4.0 mL) was stirred at 75 °C for 5 h, then the resulting solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to remove the solvent. The residue was redissolved in dichloroethane (DCE, 4.0 mL), which was used freshly as the metal catalyst for the photochemical reactions.

Representative procedure for the photocatalytic asymmetric three-component reaction

A dried 25 mL Schlenk tube was charged with 1a1zo (2.0 or 4.0 mmol), 2a (0.20 mmol), PC1 (3.4 mg, 0.010 mmol), DABCO ∙ (SO2)2 (36.0 mg, 0.15 mmol), chiral nickel catalyst [L7-Ni] (4.0 mL, taken from the above-mentioned freshly prepared solution in DCE), and DCE (4.0 mL). The mixture was degassed via three freeze-pump-thaw cycles. The Schlenk tube was positioned approximately 5 cm away from a 24 W blue LEDs lamp (λmax = 455 or 420 nm). After being stirred at 0 °C or 20 °C for 24–75 h (monitored by TLC analysis), the reaction mixture was concentrated, then purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (eluted with CH2Cl2 or PE:EtOAc = 4:1) to afford a non-racemic product 3a3zo, 512.

Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-22690-3.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 22071209), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (grant no. 2017J06006), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 20720190048).

Author contributions

S.C. and L.G. designed and conceived the project. S.C. and W.H. conducted all the synthetic and mechanistic experiments. S.C., W.H., and L.G. analyzed and interpreted the experimental data. Z.Y. designed and performed the theoretical calculations. L.G. prepared the manuscript. S.C. and Z.Y. prepared the Supplementary Information.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within this article and its Supplementary Information file, or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The experimental procedures and characterization of all new compounds are provided in Supplementary Information. The X-ray crystallographic coordinates for structures reported in this study have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), under deposition numbers CCDC 2028396 (3b), and CCDC 2054187 ([L6-Ni]). These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

1. 

    Feng M, Tang B, Liang SH, Jiang X. Sulfur containing scaffolds in drugs: synthesis and application in medicinal chemistry. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.2016. 16: 1200-1216 doi: 10.2174/1568026615666150915111741

2. 

    Yamada M, . Novel cyclohexene derivatives as anti-sepsis agents: synthetic studies and inhibition of NO and cytokine production. Bioorg. Med. Chem.2008. 16: 3941-3958 doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.01.030

3. 

    Scott JP, . Practical asymmetric synthesis of a γ-secretase inhibitor exploiting substrate-controlled intramolecular nitrile oxide-olefin cycloaddition. J. Org. Chem.2006. 71: 3086-3092 doi: 10.1021/jo060033i

4. 

    Monn JA, . Synthesis and metabotropic glutamate receptor activity of S-oxidized variants of (−)-4-amino-2-thiabicyclo-[3.1.0]hexane-4,6-dicarboxylate: identification of potent, selective, and orally bioavailable agonists for mGlu2/3 receptors. J. Med. Chem.2007. 50: 233-240 doi: 10.1021/jm060917u

5. 

    Himmelmann A, Bergbrant A, Svensson A, Hansson L, Aurell M. Remikiren (Ro 42-5892)–an orally active renin inhibitor in essential hypertension: effects on blood pressure and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Am. J. Hypertens.1996. 9: 517-522 doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00340-1

6. 

    Man H-W, . Discovery of (S)-N-{2-[1-(3-ethoxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methanesulfonylethyl]-1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-isoindol-4-yl}acetamide (Apremilast), a potent and orally active phosphodiesterase 4 and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor. J. Med. Chem.2009. 52: 1522-1524 doi: 10.1021/jm900210d

7. 

    Alba A-NR, Companyó X, Rios R. Sulfones: new reagents in organocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev.2010. 39: 2018-2033 doi: 10.1039/b911852g

8. 

    Nielsen M, Jacobsen CB, Holub N, Paixão MW, Jørgensen KA. Asymmetric organocatalysis with sulfones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2010. 49: 2668-2679 doi: 10.1002/anie.200906340

9. 

    Zhang Z, Butt NA, Zhang W. Asymmetric hydrogenation of nonaromatic cyclic substrates. Chem. Rev.2016. 116: 14769-14827 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00564

10. 

    Wu X-S, Chen Y, Li M-B, Zhou M-G, Tian S-K. Direct substitution of primary allylic amines with sulfinate salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2012. 134: 14694-14697 doi: 10.1021/ja306407x

11. 

    Jin Z, Xu J, Yang S, Song B-A, Chi YR. Enantioselective sulfonation of enones with sulfonyl imines by copperative N-heterocyclic-carbene/thiourea/tertiary-amine multicatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2013. 52: 12354-12358 doi: 10.1002/anie.201305023

12. 

    Yan Q, . Highly efficient enantioselective synthesis of chiral sulfones by Rh-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2019. 141: 1749-1756 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b12657

13. 

    Cai A, Kleij AW. Regio- and enantioselective preparation of chiral allylic sulfones featuring elusive quaternary stereocenters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2019. 58: 14944-14949 doi: 10.1002/anie.201908318

14. 

    Zhang Q, Dong D, Zi W. Palladium-catalyzed regio- and enantioselective hydrosulfonylation of 1,3-dienes with sulfinic acids: scope, mechanism, and origin of selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2020. 142: 15860-15869 doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c05976

15. 

    Labinger JA, Bercaw JE. Understanding and exploiting C-H bond activation. Nature2002. 417: 507-514 doi: 10.1038/417507a

16. 

    Goldberg KI, Goldman AS. Large-scale selective functionalization of alkanes. Acc. Chem. Res.2017. 50: 620-626 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00621

17. 

    Shu C, Noble A, Aggarwal VK. Metal-free photoinduced C(sp3)-H borylation of alkanes. Nature2020. 586: 714-719 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2831-6

18. 

    Shu W, Lorente A, Gómez-Bengoa E, Nevado C. Expeditious diastereoselective synthesis of elaborated ketones via remote Csp3-H functionalization. Nat. Commun.2017. 8: 13832 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13832

19. 

    Sharma A, Hartwig JF. Metal-catalysed azidation of tertiary C-H bonds suitable for late-stage functionalization. Nature2015. 517: 600-604 doi: 10.1038/nature14127

20. 

    Cook AK, Schimler SD, Matzger AJ, Sanford MS. Catalyst-controlled selectivity in the C-H borylation of methane and ethane. Science2016. 351: 1421-1424 doi: 10.1126/science.aad9289

21. 

    Zhang RK, . Enzymatic assembly of carbon-carbon bonds via iron-catalysed sp3 C-H functionalization. Nature2019. 565: 67-72 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0808-5

22. 

23. 

    Shu W, Nevado C. Visible-light-mediated remote aliphatic C-H functionalizations through a 1,5-hydrogen transfer cascade. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2017. 56: 1881-1884 doi: 10.1002/anie.201609885

24. 

    Hu A, Guo J-J, Pan H, Zuo Z. Selective functionalization of methane, ethane, and higher alkanes by cerium photocatalysis. Science2018. 361: 668-672 doi: 10.1126/science.aat9750

25. 

    An Q, . Cerium-catalyzed C-H functionalizations of alkanes utilizing alcohols as hydrogen atom transfer agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2020. 142: 6216-6226 doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c00212

26. 

    Xu W, Wang W, Liu T, Xie J, Zhu C. Late-stage trifluoromethylthiolation of benzylic C-H bonds. Nat. Commun.2019. 10: 4867 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12844-9

27. 

    Ackerman LKG, Martinez Alvarado JI, Doyle AG. Direct C-C bond formation from alkanes using Ni-photoredox catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2018. 140: 14059-14063 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b09191

28. 

    Shen Y, Gu Y, Martin R. sp3 C-H arylation and alkylation enabled by the synergy of triplet excited ketones and nickel catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2018. 140: 12200-12209 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07405

29. 

    Fan X-Z, . Eosin Y as a direct hydrogen-atom transfer photocatalyst for the functionalization of C-H bonds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2018. 57: 8514-8518 doi: 10.1002/anie.201803220

30. 

    Dewanji A, Krach PE, Rueping M. The dual role of benzophenone in visible-light/nickel photoredox-catalyzed C-H arylations: hydrogen-atom transfer and energy transfer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2019. 58: 3566-3570 doi: 10.1002/anie.201901327

31. 

    Davies HML, Liao K. Dirhodium tetracarboxylates as catalysts for selective intermolecular C-H functionalization. Nat. Rev. Chem.2019. 3: 347-360 doi: 10.1038/s41570-019-0099-x

32. 

    Liao K, Negretti S, Musaev DG, Bacsa J, Davies HML. Site-selective and stereoselective functionalization of unactivated C-H bonds. Nature2016. 533: 230-234 doi: 10.1038/nature17651

33. 

    Liao K, . Site-selective and stereoselective functionalization of non-activated tertiary C-H bonds. Nature2017. 551: 609-613 doi: 10.1038/nature24641

34. 

    Fu J, Ren Z, Bacsa J, Musaev DG, Davies HML. Desymmetrization of cyclohexanes by site- and stereoselective C-H functionalization. Nature2018. 564: 395-399 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0799-2

35. 

    Liao K, . Design of catalysts for site-selective and enantioselective functionalization of non-activated primary C-H bonds. Nat. Chem.2018. 10: 1048-1055 doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0087-7

36. 

    Garlets ZJ, . Enantioselective C-H functionalization of bicycle[1.1.1]pentanes. Nat. Catal.2020. 3: 351-357 doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0417-1

37. 

    Garlets ZJ, Wertz BD, Liu W, Voight EA, Davies HML. Regio- and stereoselective rhodium(II)-catalyzed C-H functionalization of cyclobutanes. Chem2020. 6: 304-313 doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.12.014

38. 

    Li Y, Lei M, Gong L. Photocatalytic regio- and stereoselective C(sp3)-H functionalization of benzylic and allylic hydrocarbons as well as unactivated alkanes. Nat. Catal.2019. 2: 1016-1026 doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0357-9

39. 

    Zheng D, Yu J, Wu J. Generation of sulfonyl radicals from aryldiazonium tetrafluoroborates and sulfur dioxide: the synthesis of 3-sulfonated coumarins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2016. 55: 11925-11929 doi: 10.1002/anie.201607292

40. 

    Qiu G, Lai L, Cheng J, Wu J. Recent advances in sulfonylation reactions of alkenes with the insertion of sulfur dioxide via radical reactions. Chem. Commun.2018. 53: 10405-10414 doi: 10.1039/C8CC05847D

41. 

    Meng Y, Wang M, Jiang X. Multicomponent reductive cross-coupling of an inorganic sulfur dioxide surrogate: straightforward construction of diversely functionalized sulfones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2020. 59: 1346-1353 doi: 10.1002/anie.201911449

42. 

    Li Y, Chen S, Wang M, Jiang X. Sodium dithionite-mediated decarboxylative sulfonylation: facile access to tertiary sulfones. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2020. 59: 8907-8911 doi: 10.1002/anie.202001589

43. 

    Ye S, Zheng D, Wu J, Qiu G. Photoredox-catalyzed sulfonylation of alkyl iodides, sulfur dioxide, and electron-deficient alkenes. Chem. Commun.2019. 55: 2214-2217 doi: 10.1039/C9CC00347A

44. 

    Wang X, Yang M, Xie W, Fan X, Wu J. Photoredox-catalyzed hydrosulfonylation reaction of electron-deficient alkenes with substituted hantzch esters and sulfur dioxide. Chem. Commun.2019. 55: 6010-6013 doi: 10.1039/C9CC03004B

45. 

    Xiao X, Xue J, Jiang X. Polysulfurating reagent for unsymmetrical polysulfide construction. Nat. Commun.2018. 9: 2191 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04306-5

46. 

    García-Domínguez A, Müller S, Nevado C. Nickel-catalyzed intermolecular carbosulfonylation of alkynes via sulfonyl radicals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2017. 56: 9949-9952 doi: 10.1002/anie.201704862

47. 

    Wang Y, . Synthesis of chiral sulfonyl lactones via copper-catalyzed asymmetric radical reaction of DABCO∙(SO2)2. Adv. Synth. Catal.2018. 360: 1060-1065 doi: 10.1002/adsc.201701532

48. 

    Yoon TP. Photochemical stereocontrol using tandem photoredox-chiral Lewis acid catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res.2016. 49: 2307-2315 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00280

49. 

    Huang X, Meggers E. Asymmetric photocatalysis with bis-cyclometalated rhodium complexes. Acc. Chem. Res.2019. 52: 833-847 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00028

50. 

    Lipp A, Badir SO, Molander GA. Stereoinduction in metallaphotoredox catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2021. 60: 1714-1726 doi: 10.1002/anie.202007668

51. 

    Nicewicz DA, MacMillan DWC. Merging photoredox catalysis with organocatalysis: the direct asymmetric alkylation of aldehydes. Science2008. 322: 77-80 doi: 10.1126/science.1161976

52. 

    Kamijo S, Kamijo K, Maruoka K, Murafuji T. Aryl ketone catalyzed radical allylation of C(sp3)-H bonds under photoirradiation. Org. Lett.2016. 18: 6516-6519 doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03586

53. 

    Zhou J, Tang Y. The development and application of chiral trisoxazolines in asymmetric catalysis and molecular recognition. Chem. Soc. Rev.2005. 34: 664-676 doi: 10.1039/b408712g

54. 

    Liao S, Sun X-L, Tang Y. Side arm strategy for catalyst design: modifying bisoxazolines for remote control of enantioselection and related. Acc. Chem. Res.2014. 47: 2260-2272 doi: 10.1021/ar800104y

55. 

    Wang F, Chen P, Liu G. Copper-catalyzed radical relay for asymmetric radical transformations. Acc. Chem. Res.2018. 51: 2036-2046 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00265

56. 

    Li Z-L, Fang G-C, Gu Q-S, Liu X-Y. Recent advances in copper-catalyzed radical-involved asymmetric 1,2-difunctionalization of alkenes. Chem. Soc. Rev.2020. 49: 32-48 doi: 10.1039/C9CS00681H

57. 

    Kruppa GH, Beauchamp JL. Energetics and structure of the 1- and 2-adamantyl radicals and their corresponding carbonium ions by photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc.1986. 108: 2162-2169 doi: 10.1021/ja00269a007

58. 

    Yang H-B, Feceu A, Martin DBC. Catalyst-controlled C-H functionalization of adamantanes using selective H-atom transfer. ACS Catal.2019. 9: 5708-5715 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b01394

59. 

    Jeffrey JL, Terrett JA, MacMillan DWC. O-H hydrogen bonding promotes H-atom transfer from α-C-H bonds for C-alkylation of alcohols. Science2015. 349: 1532-1536 doi: 10.1126/science.aac8555

60. 

    Kuang Y, . Asymmetric synthesis of 1,4-dicarbonyl compounds from aldehydes by hydrogen atom transfer photocatalysis and chiral Lewis acid catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2019. 58: 16859-16863 doi: 10.1002/anie.201910414

61. 

    Tanaka T, Hashiguchi K, Tanaka T, Yazaki R, Ohshima T. Chemoselective catalytic dehydrogenative cross-coupling of 2-acylimidazoles: mechanistic investigations and synthetic scope. ACS Catal.2018. 8: 8430-8440 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02361

62. 

    Huo H, . Asymmetric photoredox transition-metal catalysis activated by visible light. Nature2014. 515: 100-103 doi: 10.1038/nature13892

63. 

    Blum TR, Miller ZD, Bates DM, Guzei IA, Yoon TP. Enantioselective photochemistry through Lewis acid-catalyzed triplet energy transfer. Science2016. 354: 1391-1395 doi: 10.1126/science.aai8228

64. 

    Huang X, . Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of a nitrogen heterocycle through stereocontrolled direct photoreaction from electronically exited states. Nat. Commun.2017. 8: 2245 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02148-1

65. 

    Han B, Li Y, Yu Y, Gong L. Photocatalytic enantioselective α-aminoalkylation of acyclic imine derivatives by a chiral copper catalyst. Nat. Commun.2019. 10: 3804 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11688-7

66. 

    Zhang K, . Exploration of a chiral cobalt catalyst for visbile-light-induced enantioselective radical conjugated addition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2019. 58: 13375-13379 doi: 10.1002/anie.201907478

67. 

    Arceo E, Jurberg ID, Álvarez-Fernández A, Melchiorre P. Photochemical activity of a key donor-acceptor complex can drive stereoselective catalytic α-alkylation of aldehydes. Nat. Chem.2013. 5: 750-756 doi: 10.1038/nchem.1727

68. 

    Alonso R, Bach T. A Chiral thioxanthone as an organocatalyst for enantioselective [2+2] photocycloaddition reactions induced by visible light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2014. 53: 4368-4371 doi: 10.1002/anie.201310997

69. 

    Ding W, . Bifunctional photocatalysts for enantioselective aerobic oxidation of β-ketoesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2017. 139: 63-66 doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b11418

70. 

    Silvi M, Verrier C, Rey YP, Buzzetti L, Melchiorre P. Visible-light excitation of iminium ions enables the enantioselective catalytic β-alkylation of enals. Nat. Chem.2017. 9: 868-873 doi: 10.1038/nchem.2748

71. 

    Li J, . Formal enantioconvergent substitution of alkyl halides via catalytic asymmetric photoredox radical coupling. Nat. Commun.2018. 9: 2445 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04885-3

72. 

    Li F, . Chiral acid-catalysed enantioselective C-H functionalization of toluene and its derivatives driven by visible light. Nat. Commun.2019. 10: 1774 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09857-9

73. 

    Zhang H-H, Zhao J-J, Yu S. Enantioselective allylic alkylation with 4-alkyl-1,4-dihydro-pyridines enabled by photoredox/palladium cocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2018. 140: 16914-16919 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b10766

74. 

    Rand AW, . Dual catalytic platform for enabling sp3 α C-H arylation and alkylation of benzamides. ACS Catal.2020. 10: 4671-4676 doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c01318

75. 

    Shen Y, Gu Y, Martin R. sp3 C-H arylation and alkylation enabled by the synergy of triplet excited ketones and nickel catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2018. 140: 12200-12209 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07405

76. 

    Xia H-D, . Photoinduced copper-catalyzed asymmetric decarboxylative alkynylation with terminal alkynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2020. 59: 16926-16932 doi: 10.1002/anie.202006317

77. 

    Mitsunuma H, Tanabe S, Fuse H, Ohkubo K, Kanai M. Catalytic asymmetric allylation of aldehydes with alkenes through allylic C(sp3)-H functionalization mediated by organophotoredox and chiral chromium hybrid catalysis. Chem. Sci.2019. 10: 3459-3465 doi: 10.1039/C8SC05677C

78. 

    Tanabe S, Mitsunuma H, Kanai M. Catalytic allylation of aldehydes using unactivated alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.2020. 142: 12374-12381 doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c04735

79. 

    Cheng X, Lu H, Lu Z. Enantioselective benzylic C-H arylation via photoredox and nickel dual catalysis. Nat. Commun.2019. 10: 3549 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11392-6

80. 

    Wang T, . Enantioselective cyanation via radical-mediated C-C single bond cleavage for synthesis of chiral dinitriles. Nat. Commun.2019. 10: 5373 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13369-x

81. 

Legault, C. Y. CYLview, 1.0b. Université de Sherbrooke. http://www.cylview.org (2009).