PLoS ONE
Home Validation of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid and sensitive detection of Ureaplasma species in respiratory tracts of preterm infants
Validation of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid and sensitive detection of <i>Ureaplasma</i> species in respiratory tracts of preterm infants
Validation of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid and sensitive detection of Ureaplasma species in respiratory tracts of preterm infants

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Article Type: research-article Article History
Abstract

Introduction

A simple and rapid diagnosis of Ureaplasma spp. is required for the choice of the appropriate antibiotic. However, an ideal detection method has not been available. This study examines the efficacy of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, which provides rapid and sensitive results, to detect Ureaplasma spp. in respiratory tract samples of preterm infants.

Methods

The study included preterm infants born before 32 weeks of gestation admitted Kagoshima City Hospital from June 2018 to March 2020. Nasopharyngeal swabs and/or tracheal aspirates were obtained in the first seven postnatal days. One hundred sixty-seven nasopharyngeal swabs and 101 tracheal aspirates were analyzed by LAMP, culture, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Results

All 167 infants had a median (range) gestational age of 28.7 weeks (22.3–30.9) and birthweight 1030g (322–1828). One hundred sixty-seven nasopharyngeal swabs and 101 tracheal aspirates were obtained. In the results of nasopharyngeal swabs, the sensitivity and specificity of LAMP were 73.9% (17/23) and 97.2% (140/144), whereas those of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were 73.9% (17/23) and 95.8% (138/144), compared to culture. In the results of tracheal aspirates, the sensitivity and specificity of LAMP were 89.5% (17/19) and 92.7% (76/82), whereas those of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were 89.5% (17/19) and 93.9% (77/82), compared to culture.

Conclusions

The LAMP assay showed similar sensitivity and specificity with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in the respiratory tracts of preterm infants including extremely preterm infants during the immediate postnatal period. Therefore, the LAMP is a practical alternative for the early detection so that appropriate antibiotics can be administered for preventing BPD.

Mikami,Fuwa,Arima,Suda,Yanagihara,Ibara,and Yon: Validation of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid and sensitive detection of Ureaplasma species in respiratory tracts of preterm infants

Introduction

Ureaplasma species, which belong to the Mycoplasmataceae family of bacteria, are self-replicating minimal cells that lack a cell wall. Two biovars, Ureaplasma parvum (U. parvum) and Ureaplasma urealyticum (U. urealyticum), are most often found in humans. Ureaplasma spp. are frequently isolated from the amniotic fluid and placentas of preterm infants [1, 2] and have been associated with adverse prenatal outcomes such as miscarriages, preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and chorioamnionitis [3].

In preterm infants, the rate of respiratory colonization with Ureaplasma spp. has had a positive correlation to prematurity [4]. Three meta-analyses reported a significant association between Ureaplasma respiratory colonization and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) [57]. Animal studies also support the hypothesis that Ureaplasma colonization can lead to lung injury and BPD [8, 9].

Although ampicillin and gentamicin are usually prescribed to preterm infants prophylactically, Ureaplasma, which does not have a cell wall, is resistant to these antibiotics and responds best to macrolides for prevention of BPD [10, 11]; one meta-analysis assessing the use of macrolides reported that azithromycin is effective against BPD alone and BPD and/or death [12].

A simple and rapid diagnosis of Ureaplasma spp. is not currently available, which hampers clinicians in correctly choosing the most effective antibiotic. A bacterial culture, the gold–standard method, takes two to three days and requires special media and a culture chamber [13]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be an alternative, but three hours are required to purify and amplify the DNA; PCR can be performed only in research laboratories due to the necessity for a thermal cycler.

The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay is an alternative nucleic acid detection method that uses a unique priming mechanism [14]. The DNA amplification reaction occurs in an isothermal condition without thermal cycling, and the unaided eye can recognize LAMP-amplified products by observing the turbidity of the reaction tubes; these advantages could enable bedside use of the LAMP assay to detect Ureaplasma spp.

Fuwa et al. developed a novel detection method for Ureaplasma spp. using the LAMP method and demonstrated that it outperformed the culture test and conventional PCR method in vaginal swab samples [15]. However, it has not been demonstrated if this method would be effective for neonates. This study compares the LAMP assay, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and cultures to detect Ureaplasma spp. in respiratory tract samples of preterm infants.

Materials and methods

Clinical specimens

The Institutional Review Board of Kagoshima City Hospital approved the study protocol (Approval Number: 2017–57). Written parental consent was obtained for all participants. Eligible subjects were preterm infants born before 32 weeks gestational age and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of Kagoshima City Hospital (Kagoshima, Kagoshima, Japan) from June 2018 to March 2020. The specimens were obtained in the first seven postnatal days and transported to the laboratory within three hours at room temperature. Nasopharyngeal swabs and tracheal aspirates were simultaneously obtained from infants who were mechanically ventilated; only nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained from non-intubated infants. Two FLOQ swabs (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, US) were obtained from each infant: one for the bacterial culture, and the other suspended in 200 μL saline for qPCR and LAMP detection.

DNA was extracted for the LAMP assay by an SR DNA extraction kit (Eiken Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and for qPCR assay by a QIAamp DNA mini-kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, US), according to the instructions of manufacture. The tracheal aspirates were obtained by suctioning with TRACHCARE (Halyard Health, Alpharetta, TX, US). If the yield was insufficient, 0.5–1 ml of saline was installed intratracheally before suctioning again. The tracheal aspirates were centrifuged for 15 minutes at 20,000 g. After removal of the supernatant, the remaining 200 μL was used for culture and DNA extraction. All primers were synthesized by Hokkaido System Science (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan).

Preparation for positive controls

The cloned fragments of the ureB gene of U. parvum (SV3F4) [16] and U. urealyticum (UU3) [17] were used as a positive control for each Ureaplasma species. The cloning procedure for ureB genes was performed in accordance with a previous report [15].

LAMP reaction

LAMP primers targeting the ureB gene for the detection of U. parvum or U. urealyticum were taken from the published study by Fuwa et al. (S1 Table) [15]. LAMP reactions were performed in a 25-μl volume consisting of 5 μl template, 8 U of Bst DNA polymerase, 25 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 4 M betaine, 1.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 2.5 M KCL, 1 M (NH4)SO4, 1 M MgSO4, and 20% Tween 20. Primers were used at these concentrations: 1.6 μM each of FIP and BIP, 0.2 μM each of F3 and B3, 0.4 μM each) of LF and LB. The mixture was incubated at 63°C for 60 min and then heated at 80°C for 2 min to terminate the reaction. The detection was performed by real-time measurement of turbidity using a Loopamp EXIA (Eiken Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and visual observation. Every assay included positive U. parvum or U. urealyticum DNA and negative controls (nuclease-free water). All samples were tested in duplicate. A positive result in either U. parvum or U. urealyticum was defined as a positive LAMP result.

Quantitative real-time PCR reaction

The qPCR primers targeting the ureB gene to detect U. parvum or U. urealyticum were taken from the study by Mallard et al. (S1 Table) [18]. The qPCR SYBR Green assay was performed in a 25-μL volume containing 5 μL of template, using a Thermal Cycler Dice Real-Time System (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) with a commercial reagent (TB Green Premix Ex Taq II [Tli RNaseH Plus], Takara Bio, Inc., Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of each primer was 0.4 μM in the reaction mixture. The qPCR protocol was 45°C for 5 min, 95°C for 10 s, and 45 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s.

To determine the specificity of the qPCR reactions, a melt-curve analysis was performed after amplification by slow heating from 60°C to 90°C, with fluorescence acquisition at 0.5°C intervals. The assay result was considered positive when the number of the threshold cycle (Ct) was 38 or less, and the melting temperature (Tm) variation between the sample and the positive control was within 1°C. Every assay included positive U. parvum or U. urealyticum DNA and negative (nuclease-free water) controls. All samples were tested in duplicate. A positive result in either the U. parvum or U. urealyticum was defined as a positive qPCR result.

Culture

The specimens were cultured in a Urea-arginine LYO2 broth (Biomerieux, Lyon, France) in 5% CO2 at 35°C for 48 hours. Nasopharyngeal swabs were soaked in the broth, and 100 μL of tracheal aspirates were applied to the broth. After the incubation period, the color of the medium changed from yellow to red because of urea hydrolysis, indicating Ureaplasma spp. positivity. We identified U. parvum or U. urealyticum by LAMP assay, which was performed as described above using extracted DNA from 25 μL of the positive broth.

Statistical analysis

The clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of the LAMP and qPCR assays were compared to those of the conventional culture method, which provided the gold standard. The 95% confidential interval (CI) was calculated using a standard interval estimation and Jeffreys prior interval for a small n, as previously described [19]. Data were analyzed using Excel 2013 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).

Results

There were 167 preterm infants eligible for the study, and, of those, 101 were mechanically ventilated. The characteristics of both groups are shown in Table 1. All 167 eligible infants had a median (range) gestational age (GA) of 28.7 weeks (22.3–30.9) and birthweight 1030g (322–1828). The 101 intubated infants were GA of 28.9 weeks (22.3–31.7) and birthweight 804g (322–1808). The median day (range) of taking nasopharyngeal swabs was day1 (day0-7). Tracheal aspirates were taken on day1 (day0-7). We collected 167 nasopharyngeal swabs, one from each infant, and 101 tracheal aspirates, one from each of the intubated infants.

Table 1
Characteristics of the subjects.
All eligible infants (n = 167)Mechanically ventilated infants (n = 101)
Gestational age (weeks)28.7 (22.3–30.9)28.9 (22.3–31.7)
Birth weight (g)1030 (322–1828)804 (322–1808)
Sex (Male: Female)89:7846:55
Apgar score (1min)4 (1–8)3 (1–8)
Apgar score (5min)7 (2–10)6 (2–9)
day of sample collection1 (0–7)1 (0–7)

Data are given as median (range).

The culture positivity in nasopharyngeal swabs and/or tracheal aspirates was 27/167 infants (16.2%). In 27 culture-positive infants, both nasopharyngeal swabs and tracheal aspirates were obtained in 22 intubated infants, and only nasophalyngeal swabs were taken in five non-intubated infants. Among the 22 infants, four infants were culture-positive only in tracheal aspirates and three infants were culture-positive only in nasopharyngeal swabs. In 15 infants who were culture-positive in both samples, U. parvum was detected in 11 infants, and U. urealyticum was detected in the remaining four infants. The LAMP assays completely matched in both samples.

To compare the detection of U. parvum and U. urealyticum, LAMP assays were performed on the 27 culture-positive infants. U. parvum was detected in 22 infants, and U. urealyticum was detected in the remaining five infants. No simultaneous detection of U. parvum and U. urealyticum was observed.

Nasopharyngeal swabs

Twenty-three of the 167 nasopharyngeal samples (13.8%) were culture-positive; 21/167 samples (12.6%) were LAMP-positive; and 23/167 samples (13.8%) were qPCR-positive. Of the 23 culture-positive samples, 17 showed a complete match with LAMP and qPCR results, and six were LAMP-negative/qPCR-negative. Four culture-negative samples were positive by both LAMP and qPCR; two qPCR positive samples were negative by both culture and LAMP (Fig 1).

Detection of Ureaplasma species in nasopharyngeal swabs analyzed by culture, LAMP, and qPCR.
Fig 1

Detection of Ureaplasma species in nasopharyngeal swabs analyzed by culture, LAMP, and qPCR.

In each field of the venn diagram, the number of samples positive for Ureaplasma species is given. LAMP; Loop-mediated isothermal amplification. qPCR; Quantitative real-time PCR.

Table 2 shows the overall performances of the LAMP and qPCR tests to detect Ureaplasma spp. from nasopharyngeal samples. The results of LAMP compared to culture were sensitivity: 73.9% (17/23; 95% CI, 53.9–88.3%); specificity: 97.2% (140/144; 95% CI, 93.5–98.3%); PPV: 81.0% (17/21; 95% CI, 60.8–93.2%); and NPV: 95.9% (140/146; 95% CI, 91.7–98.3%). In contrast, the outcomes of qPCR were sensitivity: 73.9% (17/23; 95% CI, 53.9–88.3%); specificity: 95.8% (138/144; 95% CI, 91.6–98.2%); PPV: 73.9% (17/23; 95% CI, 53.9–88.3%); and NPV: 95.8% (138/144; 95% CI, 91.6–98.2%).

Table 2
Comparison of LAMP, quantitative real-time PCR, and culture results from 167 nasopharyngeal swab specimens.
Detection of U. parvum or U. urealyticumaCulturebSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPVc (95% CI)NPVd (95% CI)
PosNegTotal
LAMPePos17 (4)f4 (1)21 (5)73.9% (53.9–88.3)97.2% (93.5–98.3)81.0% (60.8–93.2)95.9% (91.7–98.3)
Neg614014617/23140/14417/21140/146
qPCRgPos17 (4)6 (1)23 (5)73.9% (53.9–88.3)95.8% (91.6–98.2)73.9% (53.9–88.3)95.8% (91.6–98.2)
Neg613814417/23138/14417/23138/144
Total23144167

a U. parvum: Ureaplasma parvum, U. urealyticum: Ureaplasma urealyticum.

b Cultures were performed with Urea-arginin LYO2 broth. Pos indicates that a Ureaplasma strain was isolated, and Neg indicates that no Ureaplasma strain was isolated.

c PPV: positive predictive value.

d NPV: negative predictive value.

e LAMP reactions were performed using a Loopamp real-time turbidimeter (LA-500; Eiken Co., Ltd.). Pos indicates that amplification occurred in either the U. parvum or U. urealyticum LAMP assay, and Neg indicates that amplification did not occur in neither the U. parvum nor the U. urealyticum LAMP assays.

f Number of U. urealyticum culture-positive samples confirmed by LAMP assay. In the 23 culture-positive samples, U. parvum was detected in 19 samples, and U. urealyticum was detected in the remaining 4 samples.

g Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was confirmed using a Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System (Takara Bio Inc.). Pos indicates that amplification occurred with the U. parvum or U. urealyticum qPCR assay, and Neg indicates that amplification did not occur in neither the U. parvum nor the U. urealyticum qPCR assay.

Tracheal aspirate

In 101 tracheal aspirates, 19/101 samples (18.8%) were culture-positive, 23/101 samples (22.8%) were LAMP-positive, and 22/101 samples (21.8%) were qPCR positive. Among 19 culture-positive samples, 16 samples showed a complete match with LAMP and qPCR results; one sample was LAMP-negative/qPCR-negative; one sample was LAMP-positive/qPCR-negative; and one sample was LAMP-negative/qPCR-positive. In five culture-negative samples, all were positive by both LAMP and qPCR. In addition, one LAMP positive sample was negative by both culture and qPCR (Fig 2).

Detection of Ureaplasma species in tracheal aspirates analyzed by culture, LAMP, and qPCR.
Fig 2

Detection of Ureaplasma species in tracheal aspirates analyzed by culture, LAMP, and qPCR.

In each field of the venn diagram, the number of samples positive for Ureaplasma species is given. LAMP; Loop-mediated isothermal amplification. qPCR; Quantitative real-time PCR.

The overall performances of the LAMP, qPCR, and culture tests used for the detection of Ureaplasma spp. in tracheal aspirates are shown in Table 3. Comparing LAMP to culture, the results were sensitivity: 89.5% (17/19; 95% CI, 70.3–97.8%); specificity: 92.7% (76/82; 95% CI, 85.5–96.9%); PPV: 73.9% (17/23; 95% CI, 53.9–88.3%); and NPV: 97.4% (76/78; 95% CI, 92.0–99.5%). In contrast, the outcomes of qPCR were sensitivity: 89.5% (17/19; 95% CI, 70.3–97.8%); specificity: 93.9% (77/82; 95% CI, 87.2–97.6%); PPV: 77.3% (17/22; 95% CI, 57.1–90.8%); and NPV: 97.5% (77/79; 95% CI, 92.1–99.5%).

Table 3
Comparison of LAMP, quantitative real-time PCR, and culture results from 101 tracheal aspirate specimens.
Detection of U. parvum or U. urealyticumaCulturebSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPVc (95% CI)NPVd (95% CI)
PosNegTotal
LAMPePos17 (5)f6 (1)23 (6)89.5% (70.3–97.8)92.7% (85.5–96.9)73.9% (53.9–88.3)97.4% (92.0–99.5)
Neg2767817/1976/8217/2376/78
qPCRgPos17 (5)522 (5)89.5% (70.3–97.8)93.9% (87.2–97.6)77.3% (57.1–90.8)97.5% (92.1–99.5)
Neg2777917/1977/8217/2277/79
Total1982101

a U. parvum: Ureaplasma parvum, U. urealyticum: Ureaplasma urealyticum.

b Cultures were performed in Urea-arginine LYO2 broth. Pos indicates that a Ureaplasma strain was isolated, and Neg indicates that no Ureaplasma strain was isolated.

c PPV, positive predictive value.

d NPV, negative predictive value.

e LAMP reaction was performed using a Loopamp real-time turbidimeter (LA-500; Eiken Co., Ltd). Pos indicates that amplification occurred in the U. parvum or U. urealyticum LAMP assay, and Neg indicates that amplification did not occur in neither the U. parvum nor the U. urealyticum LAMP assays.

f Number of U. urealyticum culture-positive samples confirmed by LAMP assay. In the 19 culture-positive samples, U. parvum was detected in 14 samples, and U. urealyticum was detected in the remaining 5 samples.

g Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was confirmed using a Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System (Takara Bio, Inc.). Pos indicates that amplification occurred with the U. parvum or U. urealyticum qPCR assay, and Neg indicates that amplification did not occur in neither the U. parvum nor the U. urealyticum qPCR assays.

Discussion/Conclusion

Ureaplasma spp. respiratory colonization has been shown to cause pulmonary inflammation and altered lung development [20] in neonates and is a significant risk factor for BPD [57]. Antibiotics that are prophylactically given to preterm infants (ampicillin and gentamicin) are ineffective against Ureaplasma, but studies have reported that using macrolides antibiotic therapy reduced the incidence of BPD [1012]. Hence, it is important to develop a simple and rapid method to detect Ureaplasma spp. in preterm infants. This study clarified that the accuracy of the LAMP method to detect for Ureaplasma spp. was similar with that of qPCR. The LAMP method was most sensitive in the tracheal aspirates from intubated preterm infants, who are at high risk of developing BPD.

We studied preterm infants of less than 32 weeks of gestational age including extremely preterm infants. All samples were taken during immediate postnatal period. The culture positivity in nasopharyngeal swabs and/or tracheal aspirates was 27/167 infants (16.2%). The detection rate of Ureaplasma spp. in our study was similar to the results found in previous studies. In a study by Ballard et al., the culture-based detection rate in the tracheal aspirates of intubated infants weighing less than 1,000 g was 18.6% (8/43) [21]. In a study by Jonsson et al., the detection rate by culture among intubated infants of less than 30 weeks gestational age was 15.5% (24/155) in bronchial aspirates and 10.3% (16/155) in nasopharyngeal swabs [22]. In a study by Lyon et al., Ureaplasma spp. were detected in tracheal aspirates by both culture test method and conventional PCR in 15.0% (9/60) of infants at 30 or fewer weeks of gestational age [23].

Bacterial cultures are still the gold standard for the detection of Ureaplasma spp., and have the advantage of performing drug sensitivity tests and detecting other pathogens [13]. However, it takes at least 2–3 days and more to analyze drug sensitivities. Antibiotic therapy for BPD prevention should not be delayed after the results are available, as a pro-inflammatory response in the developing lung occurs even in utero [20].

Detecting Ureaplasma spp. with qPCR has been reported to have higher sensitivity and specificity compared to culture. In a study using amniotic fluid samples, the sensitivity and specificity of two qPCRs targeting 16S rRNA were 81.8–92.3% and 89.4–97.4%, respectively [24]. In another study of vaginal swab samples, the sensitivity was 95.1%, and specificity was 75.5% [25]. The low specificity and numerous false positives suggest that a pathogen undetected by culture can be detected by qPCR. However, the qPCR requires a thermal cycler and is not suitable for bedside use.

As an alternative to qPCR, LAMP, a nucleic acid amplification assay, is faster, less complicated, and highly specific [14]. LAMP has been clinically applied to detect various pathogens [2628], and a standard-displacing DNA polymerase enables isothermal amplification without the thermal cycler. The amplification efficiency and specificity are high because four to six primers are designed for the six gene regions. The amplification process, therefore, is usually completed within one hour, and the results can be visually confirmed. The high amplification efficiency makes it possible to use a simple nucleic acid extraction kit and tolerate the polymerase inhibitors in samples.

Few studies have examined the efficacy of the LAMP assay to detect Ureaplasma spp. We recently reported that the LAMP method for Ureaplasma spp. was effective to test vaginal swabs [15]. To the best of our knowledge, the present work is the first report on the LAMP method in neonatal samples. We believe our system is superior compared to culture and a qPCR because of its convenience, simplicity, and accuracy.

It is more difficult to collect samples from preterm infants than from adults. A nasopharyngeal swab is hard to introduce into the narrow nasal cavity of preterm infants and can cause bleeding. Sputum can easily be collected from adults, but tracheal intubation and suction are necessary to obtain specimens from the lower respiratory tracts of preterm infants. This procedure, even administered for a short time, can induce bradycardia, hypoxemia, and tachycardia. In neonatal intensive care unit, less-invasive and less-time consuming laboratory tests are preferable because those tests enable neonatologists to address the time margin to select appropriate antibiotics which may prevent BPD.

We found the LAMP assay to be more sensitive in testing bronchial aspirates than in testing nasopharyngeal swabs. The amount of DNA included in some nasopharyngeal swabs may be below the detection limit because of the narrow of nasal cavities and blood contaminations may affect the DNA extraction and amplification. Since the risk of BPD is greater in intubated preterm infants than in non-intubated pretem infants [22], it is reasonable to perform the LAMP method for tracheal aspirates in intubated preterm infants. Nasopharyngeal swabs can be an alternative in case of severe complications during suction.

This study is not without its limitations. First, the PPV of the LAMP method is low. The prevalence of Ureaplasma spp. colonization in neonatal respiratory tracts is 10.3–18.7% [2123]. At the prevalence of Ureaplasma spp. colonization, the PPV decreases, and false positives increase even if both the sensitivity and specificity are high. Another limitation is that the LAMP method can detect dead bacteria that are not detectable by culture tests; therefore, it is better to perform culture simultaneously with the LAMP method and confirm whether both results match. Second, this method requires two LAMP tests for both U. parvum and U. urealyticum. Our group is currently designing a primer that can detect both U. parvum and U. urealyticum in a single assay. Third, if gene mutations occur in the LAMP target gene regions, the sensitivity may decrease because LAMP method requires 2 to 3 sets of primers compared to a single set of primers used in usual PCR method. The final limitation is the small sample size used from a single institution; studying the LAMP assay in preterm infants would benefit from tests in a multicenter trial with large sample sizes.

In conclusion, we established a rapid and sensitive LAMP method, which was applicable for detecting Ureaplasma spp. in preterm infants during the immediate postanatal period.

References

RMViscardi. Ureaplasma species: role in diseases of prematurity. Clin Perinatol. 2010;37(2):393409. Epub 2010/06/24. 10.1016/j.clp.2009.12.003 .

FNamba, THasegawa, MNakayama, THamanaka, TYamashita, KNakahira, et al. Placental features of chorioamnionitis colonized with Ureaplasma species in preterm delivery. Pediatr Res. 2010;67(2):16672. Epub 2009/10/28. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181c6e58e .

OAGTantengco, IYanagihara. Current understanding and treatment of intra-amniotic infection with Ureaplasma spp. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(9):1796808. Epub 2019/07/18. 10.1111/jog.14052 .

TJSung, LXiao, LDuffy, KBWaites, KLChesko, RMViscardi. Frequency of ureaplasma serovars in respiratory secretions of preterm infants at risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(5):37983. Epub 2010/11/26. 10.1097/INF.0b013e318202ac3a .

EELWang, AOhlsson, JDKellner. Association of Ureaplasma urealyticum colonization with chronic lung disease of prematurity: Results of a metaanalysis. The Journal of Pediatrics. 1995;127(4):6404. 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70130-3

RLSchelonka, BKatz, KBWaites, DKBenjaminJr. Critical appraisal of the role of Ureaplasma in the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia with metaanalytic techniques. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(12):10339. Epub 2005/12/24. 10.1097/01.inf.0000190632.31565.83 .

JLowe, WJWatkins, MOEdwards, OBSpiller, EJacqz-Aigrain, SJKotecha, et al. Association between pulmonary ureaplasma colonization and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. The Pediatric infectious disease journal. 2014;33(7):697702. Epub 2014/01/22. 10.1097/INF.0000000000000239 .

MJNovy, LDuffy, MKAxthelm, DWSadowsky, SSWitkin, MGGravett, et al. Ureaplasma parvum or Mycoplasma hominis as sole pathogens cause chorioamnionitis, preterm delivery, and fetal pneumonia in rhesus macaques. Reprod Sci. 2009;16(1):5670. Epub 2009/01/06. 10.1177/1933719108325508 .

RMViscardi, SPAtamas, IGLuzina, JDHasday, JRHe, PJSime, et al. Antenatal Ureaplasma urealyticum respiratory tract infection stimulates proinflammatory, profibrotic responses in the preterm baboon lung. Pediatr Res. 2006;60(2):1416. Epub 2006/07/26. 10.1203/01.pdr.0000228322.73777.05 .

10 

HOBallard, LAShook, PBernard, MIAnstead, RKuhn, VWhitehead, et al. Use of azithromycin for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011;46(2):1118. Epub 2010/10/22. 10.1002/ppul.21352 .

11 

ROzdemir, OErdeve, EADizdar, SSOguz, NUras, SSaygan, et al. Clarithromycin in preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in Ureaplasma urealyticum-positive preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2011;128(6):e1496501. Epub 2011/11/30. 10.1542/peds.2011-1350 .

12 

VNair, PLoganathan, ASSoraisham. Azithromycin and other macrolides for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neonatology. 2014;106(4):33747. Epub 2014/10/04. 10.1159/000363493 .

13 

RMViscardi. Ureaplasma species: role in neonatal morbidities and outcomes. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99(1):F8792. Epub 2013/08/21. 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303351 .

14 

TNotomi, HOkayama, HMasubuchi, TYonekawa, KWatanabe, NAmino, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(12):E63. Epub 2000/06/28. 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63 .

15 

KFuwa, MSeki, YHirata, IYanagihara, YNakura, CTakano, et al. Rapid and simple detection of Ureaplasma species from vaginal swab samples using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;79(1). Epub 2017/11/21. 10.1111/aji.12771 .

16 

HNWu, YNakura, DMotooka, SNakamura, FNishiumi, SIshino, et al. Complete Genome Sequence of Ureaplasma parvum Serovar 3 Strain SV3F4, Isolated in Japan. Genome Announc. 2014;2(3). Epub 2014/05/24. 10.1128/genomeA.00256-14 .

17 

YKawai, YNakura, TWakimoto, MNomiyama, TTokuda, TTakayanagi, et al. In vitro activity of five quinolones and analysis of the quinolone resistance-determining regions of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE in Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum clinical isolates from perinatal patients in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(4):235864. Epub 2015/02/04. 10.1128/AAC.04262-14 .

18 

KMallard, KSchopfer, TBodmer. Development of real-time PCR for the differential detection and quantification of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum. Journal of microbiological methods. 2005;60(1):139. Epub 2004/11/30. 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.08.005 .

19 

LDBrown, TTCai, ADasGupta. Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion. Statist Sci. 2001;16(2):10133. 10.1214/ss/1009213286

20 

RMViscardi, JDHasday. Role of Ureaplasma species in neonatal chronic lung disease: epidemiologic and experimental evidence. Pediatr Res. 2009;65(5 Pt 2):84r90r. Epub 2009/02/05. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31819dc2f9 .

21 

HOBallard, MIAnstead, LAShook. Azithromycin in the extremely low birth weight infant for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a pilot study. Respiratory research. 2007;8:41. Epub 2007/06/07. 10.1186/1465-9921-8-41 .

22 

BJonsson, MRylander, GFaxelius. Ureaplasma urealyticum, erythromycin and respiratory morbidity in high-risk preterm neonates. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(10):107984. Epub 1998/11/24. 10.1080/080352598750031428 .

23 

AJLyon, JMcColm, LMiddlemist, SFergusson, NMcIntosh, PWRoss. Randomised trial of erythromycin on the development of chronic lung disease in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998;78(1):F104. Epub 1998/04/16. 10.1136/fn.78.1.f10 .

24 

PGirón de Velasco-Sada, IFalces-Romero, IQuiles-Melero, AGarcía-Perea, JMingorance. Evaluation of two real time PCR assays for the detection of bacterial DNA in amniotic fluid. J Microbiol Methods. 2018;144:10710. Epub 2017/11/21. 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.11.013 .

25 

FZhao, XFeng, PLv, XXu, ZZhao. Real-time PCR assay may be used to verify suspicious test results of Ureaplasmas spp. from the liquid culture method. J Microbiol Methods. 2020;169:105831. Epub 2020/01/07. 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105831 .

26 

FKakuya, TKinebuchi, HFujiyasu, RTanaka, HKano. Genetic point-of-care diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection using LAMP assay. Pediatr Int. 2014;56(4):54752. Epub 2014/03/13. 10.1111/ped.12327 .

27 

DWKim, PEKilgore, EJKim, SAKim, DDAnh, BQDong, et al. The enhanced pneumococcal LAMP assay: a clinical tool for the diagnosis of meningitis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42954. Epub 2012/08/18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042954 .

28 

SHMoon, EJKim, JTomono, SMiyamoto, SMitarai, DWKim, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in sputum specimens using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay in Korea. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(11):133540. Epub 2015/09/05. 10.1099/jmm.0.000164 .