PLoS ONE
Home
Correction: Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study
Correction: Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study
Article Type:
Correction
Article
History
Publisher:
Public Library of Science
- Altmetric
Table of Contents
In the Results subsection of the Abstract, there is an error in the second sentence. The correct sentence is: The 155 COVID-19 publications were 18-fold more likely to be of lower evidence (95% confidence interval [CI] for odds ratio, 7.0–47; P <0.001).
In the Results subsection of the Abstract, there is also an error in the fourth sentence. The correct sentence is: There was a significant difference in the early citation rate of the original articles that favored the COVID-19 original articles (median [interquartile range], 149 [79–512] vs. 3 [1.3–7] citations; P <0.001).
Reference
1
MZdravkovic, JBerger-Estilita, BZdravkovic, DBerger (2020) Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study.
PLOS ONE
15(11): e0241826. 10.1371/journal.pone.0241826
Correction: Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study