<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:ynews="http://news.yahoo.com/rss/">
    <channel>
        <title>Nova Reader - Subject</title>
        <link>https://www.novareader.co</link>
        <description>Default RSS Feed</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Newgen KnowledgeWorks</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Cold-induced dishabituation in rodents exposed to recurrent hypoglycaemia]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766078743929-9a7220e3-bca1-442a-8682-5491bdc12737/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1007/s00125-021-05425-3</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="section" id="N65540"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-1">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p class="para" id="Par1">Recurrent hypoglycaemia in people with diabetes leads to progressive suppression of counterregulatory hormonal responses to subsequent hypoglycaemia. Recently it has been proposed that the mechanism underpinning this is a form of adaptive memory referred to as habituation. To test this hypothesis, we use two different durations of cold exposure to examine whether rodents exposed to recurrent hypoglycaemia exhibit two characteristic features of habituation, namely stimulus generalisation and dishabituation.</p></div><div class="section" id="N65546"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-2">Methods</h3><p class="para" id="Par2">In the first study (stimulus generalisation study), hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic (2.8 mmol/l) glucose clamps were performed in non-diabetic rodents exposed to prior moderate-duration cold (4°C for 3 h) or control conditions. In the second study (dishabituation study), rodents exposed to prior recurrent hypoglycaemia or saline (154 mmol/l NaCl) injections over 4 weeks underwent a longer-duration cold (4°C for 4.5 h) exposure followed 24 h later by a hyperinsulinaemic–hypoglycaemic (2.8 mmol/l) glucose clamp. Output measures were counterregulatory hormone responses during experimental hypoglycaemia.</p></div><div class="section" id="N65552"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-3">Results</h3><p class="para" id="Par3">Moderate-duration cold exposure blunted the adrenaline (epinephrine) response (15,266 ± 1920 vs 7981 ± 1258 pmol/l, Control vs Cold; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) to next day hypoglycaemia in healthy non-diabetic rodents. In contrast, the suppressed adrenaline response (Control 5912 ± 1417 vs recurrent hypoglycaemia 1836 ± 736 pmol/l; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) that is associated with recurrent hypoglycaemia was restored following longer-duration cold exposure (recurrent hypoglycaemia + Cold 4756 ± 826 pmol/l; not significant vs Control).</p></div><div class="section" id="N65564"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-4">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p class="para" id="Par4">Non-diabetic rodents exhibit two cardinal features of habituation, namely stimulus generalisation and dishabituation. These findings provide further support for the hypothesis that suppressed counterregulatory responses following exposure to recurrent hypoglycaemia in diabetes result from habituation.</p></div><div class="section" id="N65570"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-5">Graphical abstract</h3><p class="para" id="Par5">
<div class="imageVideo"><img src="/dataresources/secured/content-1766078743929-9a7220e3-bca1-442a-8682-5491bdc12737/assets/125_2021_5425_Figa_HTML.jpg" alt=""/></div></p></div><div class="section" id="N65580"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-6">Supplementary Information</h3><p class="para" id="N65583">The online version contains unedited but peer-reviewed supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00125-021-05425-3.</p></div>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-03-17T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Analysis of overlapping genetic association in type 1 and type 2 diabetes]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766077854506-8e267959-d2ed-4e4c-a5d2-5048178875c9/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1007/s00125-021-05428-0</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="section" id="N65540"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-1">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p class="para" id="Par1">Given the potential shared aetiology between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, we aimed to identify any genetic regions associated with both diseases. For associations where there is a shared signal and the allele that increases risk to one disease also increases risk to the other, inference about shared aetiology could be made, with the potential to develop therapeutic strategies to treat or prevent both diseases simultaneously. Alternatively, if a genetic signal co-localises with divergent effect directions, it could provide valuable biological insight into how the association affects the two diseases differently.</p></div><div class="section" id="N65546"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-2">Methods</h3><p class="para" id="Par2">Using publicly available type 2 diabetes summary statistics from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of European ancestry individuals (74,124 cases and 824,006 controls) and type 1 diabetes GWAS summary statistics from a meta-analysis of studies on individuals from the UK and Sardinia (7467 cases and 10,218 controls), we identified all regions of 0.5 Mb that contained variants associated with both diseases (false discovery rate &lt;0.01). In each region, we performed forward stepwise logistic regression to identify independent association signals, then examined co-localisation of each type 1 diabetes signal with each type 2 diabetes signal using <i>coloc</i>. Any association with a co-localisation posterior probability of ≥0.9 was considered a genuine shared association with both diseases.</p></div><div class="section" id="N65555"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-3">Results</h3><p class="para" id="Par3">Of the 81 association signals from 42 genetic regions that showed association with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, four association signals co-localised between both diseases (posterior probability ≥0.9): (1) chromosome 16q23.1, near <i>CTRB1</i>/<i>BCAR1</i>, which has been previously identified; (2) chromosome 11p15.5, near the <i>INS</i> gene; (3) chromosome 4p16.3, near <i>TMEM129</i> and (4) chromosome 1p31.3, near <i>PGM1</i>. In each of these regions, the effect of genetic variants on type 1 diabetes was in the opposite direction to the effect on type 2 diabetes. Use of additional datasets also supported the previously identified co-localisation on chromosome 9p24.2, near the <i>GLIS3</i> gene, in this case with a concordant direction of effect.</p></div><div class="section" id="N65579"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-4">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p class="para" id="Par4">Four of five association signals that co-localise between type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes are in opposite directions, suggesting a complex genetic relationship between the two diseases.</p></div><div class="section" id="N65585"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-5">Graphical abstract</h3><p class="para" id="Par5">
<div class="imageVideo"><img src="/dataresources/secured/content-1766077854506-8e267959-d2ed-4e4c-a5d2-5048178875c9/assets/125_2021_5428_Figa_HTML.jpg" alt=""/></div></p></div><div class="section" id="N65595"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-6">Supplementary Information</h3><p class="para" id="N65598">The online version contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00125-021-05428-0.</p></div>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-04-08T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Abrogating mitochondrial ROS in neurons or astrocytes reveals cell-specific impact on mouse behaviour]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765999217764-e12789a1-cb4f-4fe0-bd23-8a94ad400030/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1016/j.redox.2021.101917</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Cells naturally produce mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mROS), but the <i>in vivo</i> pathophysiological significance has long remained controversial. Within the brain, astrocyte-derived mROS physiologically regulate behaviour and are produced at one order of magnitude faster than in neurons. However, whether neuronal mROS abundance differentially impacts on behaviour is unknown. To address this, we engineered genetically modified mice to down modulate mROS levels in neurons <i>in vivo</i>. Whilst no alterations in motor coordination were observed by down modulating mROS in neurons under healthy conditions, it prevented the motor discoordination caused by the pro-oxidant neurotoxin, 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP). In contrast, abrogation of mROS in astrocytes showed no beneficial effect against the 3-NP insult. These data indicate that the impact of modifying mROS production on mouse behaviour critically depends on the specific cell-type where they are generated.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-03-03T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Multiplex quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgM antibodies based on DNA-assisted nanopore sensing]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765946157727-efc1fb8d-6357-4213-a390-7944951755c5/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113134</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread into a global pandemic. Early and accurate diagnosis and quarantine remain the most effective mitigation strategy. Although reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis, recent studies suggest that nucleic acids were undetectable in a significant number of cases with clinical features of COVID-19. Serologic assays that detect human antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 serve as a complementary method to diagnose these cases, as well as to identify asymptomatic cases and qualified convalescent serum donors. However, commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are laborious and non-quantitative, while point-of-care assays suffer from low detection accuracy. To provide a serologic assay with high performance and portability for potential point-of-care applications, we developed DNA-assisted nanopore sensing for quantification of SARS-CoV-2 related antibodies in human serum. Different DNA structures were used as detection reporters for multiplex quantification of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 in serum specimens from patients with conformed or suspected infection. Comparing to a clinically used point-of-care assay and an ELISA assay, our technology can reliably quantify SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with higher accuracy, large dynamic range, and potential for assay automation.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-03-03T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>