<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:ynews="http://news.yahoo.com/rss/">
    <channel>
        <title>Nova Reader - Subject</title>
        <link>https://www.novareader.co</link>
        <description>Default RSS Feed</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Newgen KnowledgeWorks</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Single cell epigenetic visualization assay]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766072818409-0606c8a3-b73f-44c5-89bc-92d20b3446c6/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/nar/gkab009</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Characterization of the epigenetic status of individual cells remains a challenge. Current sequencing approaches have limited coverage, and it is difficult to assign an epigenetic status to the transcription state of individual gene alleles in the same cell. To address these limitations, a targeted microscopy-based epigenetic visualization assay (EVA) was developed for detection and quantification of epigenetic marks at genes of interest in single cells. The assay is based on an <i>in situ</i> biochemical reaction between an antibody-conjugated alkaline phosphatase bound to the epigenetic mark of interest, and a 5′-phosphorylated fluorophore-labeled DNA oligo tethered to a target gene by gene-specific oligonucleotides. When the epigenetic mark is present at the gene, phosphate group removal by the phosphatase protects the oligo from λ-exonuclease activity providing a quantitative fluorescent readout. We applied EVA to measure 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and H3K9Ac levels at different genes and the HIV-1 provirus in human cell lines. To link epigenetic marks to gene transcription, EVA was combined with RNA-FISH. Higher 5mC levels at the silenced compared to transcribed <i>XIST</i> gene alleles in female somatic cells validated this approach and demonstrated that EVA can be used to relate epigenetic marks to the transcription status of individual gene alleles.</p><p class="para" id="N65542">
<div class="section" id="ga1"><div class="img"><div class="imgeVideo"><div class="img-fullscreenIcon" onClick="javascript:showImageContent('ga1');"><img src="/public/images/journalImg/fullscreen.png"/></div><div class="imageVideo"><img src="/dataresources/secured/content-1766072818409-0606c8a3-b73f-44c5-89bc-92d20b3446c6/assets/gkab009gra1.jpg" alt="Epigenetic mark visualization at a gene of interest. Alkaline phosphatase (AP) is recruited to the epigenetic mark (purple) as an antibody conjugate. Gene specific oligonucleotides anchor phosphorylated sensor oligo (red) annealed to a detector oligo (green). When the epigenetic mark is present at the gene, the AP-dephosphorylated oligo survives subsequent λ-exonuclease treatment. The presence of the epigenetic mark at the gene is quantitated using the ratio of detector/sensor signal intensities (green/red)."/></div></div><div class="imgeVideoCaption" id="N65544"><div class="captionTitle">Graphical Abstract</div><div class="captionText">                                      Epigenetic mark visualization at a gene of interest. Alkaline phosphatase (AP) is recruited to the epigenetic mark (purple) as an antibody conjugate. Gene specific oligonucleotides anchor phosphorylated sensor oligo (red) annealed to a detector oligo (green). When the epigenetic mark is present at the gene, the AP-dephosphorylated oligo survives subsequent λ-exonuclease treatment. The presence of the epigenetic mark at the gene is quantitated using the ratio of detector/sensor signal intensities (green/red).</div></div></div></div>
</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-01-28T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[To mock or not: a comprehensive comparison of mock IP and DNA input for ChIP-seq]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765907249066-4e6e53d6-9f50-4efe-9061-45312ecc9cea/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/nar/gkaa1155</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Chromatin immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) is the gold standard to detect transcription-factor (TF) binding sites in the genome. Its success depends on appropriate controls removing systematic biases. The predominantly used controls, i.e. DNA input, correct for uneven sonication, but not for nonspecific interactions of the IP antibody. Another type of controls, ‘mock’ IP, corrects for both of the issues, but is not widely used because it is considered susceptible to technical noise. The tradeoff between the two control types has not been investigated systematically. Therefore, we generated comparable DNA input and mock IP experiments. Because mock IPs contain only nonspecific interactions, the sites predicted from them using DNA input indicate the spurious-site abundance. This abundance is highly correlated with the ‘genomic activity’ (e.g. chromatin openness). In particular, compared to cell lines, complex samples such as whole organisms have more spurious sites—probably because they contain multiple cell types, resulting in more expressed genes and more open chromatin. Consequently, DNA input and mock IP controls performed similarly for cell lines, whereas for complex samples, mock IP substantially reduced the number of spurious sites. However, DNA input is still informative; thus, we developed a simple framework integrating both controls, improving binding site detection.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-12-21T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765834540189-27a77f27-c16d-41c9-b1c9-c17828968f26/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/nar/gkaa620</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Traditional epitranscriptomics relies on capturing a single RNA modification by antibody or chemical treatment, combined with short-read sequencing to identify its transcriptomic location. This approach is labor-intensive and may introduce experimental artifacts. Direct sequencing of native RNA using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) can allow for directly detecting the RNA base modifications, although these modifications might appear as sequencing errors. The percent Error of Specific Bases (%ESB) was higher for native RNA than unmodified RNA, which enabled the detection of ribonucleotide modification sites. Based on the %ESB differences, we developed a bioinformatic tool, epitranscriptional landscape inferring from glitches of ONT signals (ELIGOS), that is based on various types of synthetic modified RNA and applied to rRNA and mRNA. ELIGOS is able to accurately predict known classes of RNA methylation sites (AUC &gt; 0.93) in rRNAs from <i>Escherichia</i><i>coli</i>, yeast, and human cells, using either unmodified <i>in vitro</i> transcription RNA or a background error model, which mimics the systematic error of direct RNA sequencing as the reference. The well-known DRACH/RRACH motif was localized and identified, consistent with previous studies, using differential analysis of ELIGOS to study the impact of RNA m<sup>6</sup>A methyltransferase by comparing wild type and knockouts in yeast and mouse cells. Lastly, the DRACH motif could also be identified in the mRNA of three human cell lines. The mRNA modification identified by ELIGOS is at the level of individual base resolution. In summary, we have developed a bioinformatic software package to uncover native RNA modifications.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-07-25T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[DrugCentral 2021 supports drug discovery and repositioning]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765740831987-f69848e8-b27b-4710-8fca-333f6a06f6e5/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/nar/gkaa997</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">DrugCentral is a public resource (http://drugcentral.org) that serves the scientific community by providing up-to-date drug information, as described in previous papers. The current release includes 109 newly approved (October 2018 through March 2020) active pharmaceutical ingredients in the US, Europe, Japan and other countries; and two molecular entities (e.g. mefuparib) of interest for COVID19. New additions include a set of pharmacokinetic properties for ∼1000 drugs, and a sex-based separation of side effects, processed from FAERS (FDA Adverse Event Reporting System); as well as a drug repositioning prioritization scheme based on the market availability and intellectual property rights forFDA approved drugs. In the context of the COVID19 pandemic, we also incorporated REDIAL-2020, a machine learning platform that estimates anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities, as well as the ‘drugs in news’ feature offers a brief enumeration of the most interesting drugs at the present moment. The full database dump and data files are available for download from the DrugCentral web portal.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-11-05T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>