<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:ynews="http://news.yahoo.com/rss/">
    <channel>
        <title>Nova Reader - Subject</title>
        <link>https://www.novareader.co</link>
        <description>Default RSS Feed</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Newgen KnowledgeWorks</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Fast and Robust Identity-by-Descent Inference with the Templated Positional Burrows–Wheeler Transform]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766073909581-9495808d-aca1-4925-b639-4d9a439b99e7/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa328</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Estimating the genomic location and length of identical-by-descent (IBD) segments among individuals is a crucial step in many genetic analyses. However, the exponential growth in the size of biobank and direct-to-consumer genetic data sets makes accurate IBD inference a significant computational challenge. Here we present the templated positional Burrows–Wheeler transform (TPBWT) to make fast IBD estimates robust to genotype and phasing errors. Using haplotype data simulated over pedigrees with realistic genotyping and phasing errors, we show that the TPBWT outperforms other state-of-the-art IBD inference algorithms in terms of speed and accuracy. For each phase-aware method, we explore the false positive and false negative rates of inferring IBD by segment length and characterize the types of error commonly found. Our results highlight the fragility of most phased IBD inference methods; the accuracy of IBD estimates can be highly sensitive to the quality of haplotype phasing. Additionally, we compare the performance of the TPBWT against a widely used phase-free IBD inference approach that is robust to phasing errors. We introduce both in-sample and out-of-sample TPBWT-based IBD inference algorithms and demonstrate their computational efficiency on massive-scale data sets with millions of samples. Furthermore, we describe the binary file format for TPBWT-compressed haplotypes that results in fast and efficient out-of-sample IBD computes against very large cohort panels. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of the TPBWT in a brief empirical analysis, exploring geographic patterns of haplotype sharing within Mexico. Hierarchical clustering of IBD shared across regions within Mexico reveals geographically structured haplotype sharing and a strong signal of isolation by distance. Our software implementation of the TPBWT is freely available for noncommercial use in the code repository (https://github.com/23andMe/phasedibd, last accessed January 11, 2021).</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-12-23T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Inferring Adaptive Introgression Using Hidden Markov Models]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766073440677-72778de6-c04e-437e-bbe9-236e92d1a763/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msab014</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Adaptive introgression—the flow of adaptive genetic variation between species or populations—has attracted significant interest in recent years and it has been implicated in a number of cases of adaptation, from pesticide resistance and immunity, to local adaptation. Despite this, methods for identification of adaptive introgression from population genomic data are lacking. Here, we present Ancestry_HMM-S, a hidden Markov model-based method for identifying genes undergoing adaptive introgression and quantifying the strength of selection acting on them. Through extensive validation, we show that this method performs well on moderately sized data sets for realistic population and selection parameters. We apply Ancestry_HMM-S to a data set of an admixed <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> population from South Africa and we identify 17 loci which show signatures of adaptive introgression, four of which have previously been shown to confer resistance to insecticides. Ancestry_HMM-S provides a powerful method for inferring adaptive introgression in data sets that are typically collected when studying admixed populations. This method will enable powerful insights into the genetic consequences of admixture across diverse populations. Ancestry_HMM-S can be downloaded from https://github.com/jesvedberg/Ancestry_HMM-S/.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-01-27T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Genomics Reveals the Origins of Historical Specimens]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766073257041-5274aa19-be28-40f8-8c30-98895e7efeda/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msab013</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Centuries of zoological studies have amassed billions of specimens in collections worldwide. Genomics of these specimens promises to reinvigorate biodiversity research. However, because DNA degrades with age in historical specimens, it is a challenge to obtain genomic data for them and analyze degraded genomes. We developed experimental and computational protocols to overcome these challenges and applied our methods to resolve a series of long-standing controversies involving a group of butterflies. We deduced the geographical origins of several historical specimens of uncertain provenance that are at the heart of these debates. Here, genomics tackles one of the greatest problems in zoology: countless old specimens that serve as irreplaceable embodiments of species concepts cannot be confidently assigned to extant species or population due to the lack of diagnostic morphological features and clear documentation of the collection locality. The ability to determine where they were collected will resolve many on-going disputes. More broadly, we show the utility of applying genomics to historical museum specimens to delineate the boundaries of species and populations, and to hypothesize about genotypic determinants of phenotypic traits.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-01-27T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[A Spatially Explicit Model of Stabilizing Selection for Improving Phylogenetic Inference]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766029761842-94835189-1c8b-44bb-892a-ad6f1f5cccd5/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa318</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Ultraconserved elements (UCEs) are stretches of hundreds of nucleotides with highly conserved cores flanked by variable regions. Although the selective forces responsible for the preservation of UCEs are unknown, they are nonetheless believed to contain phylogenetically meaningful information from deep to shallow divergence events. Phylogenetic applications of UCEs assume the same degree of rate heterogeneity applies across the entire locus, including variable flanking regions. We present a Wright–Fisher model of selection on nucleotides (SelON) which includes the effects of mutation, drift, and spatially varying, stabilizing selection for an optimal nucleotide sequence. The SelON model assumes the strength of stabilizing selection follows a position-dependent Gaussian function whose exact shape can vary between UCEs. We evaluate SelON by comparing its performance to a simpler and spatially invariant GTR+Γ<div class="imageVideo"><img src="" alt=""/></div> model using an empirical data set of 400 vertebrate UCEs used to determine the phylogenetic position of turtles. We observe much improvement in model fit of SelON over the GTR+Γ<div class="imageVideo"><img src="" alt=""/></div> model, and support for turtles as sister to lepidosaurs. Overall, the UCE-specific parameters SelON estimates provide a compact way of quantifying the strength and variation in selection within and across UCEs. SelON can also be extended to include more realistic mapping functions between sequence and stabilizing selection as well as allow for greater levels of rate heterogeneity. By more explicitly modeling the nature of selection on UCEs, SelON and similar approaches can be used to better understand the biological mechanisms responsible for their preservation across highly divergent taxa and long evolutionary time scales.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-12-11T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Rampant False Detection of Adaptive Phenotypic Optimization by ParTI-Based Pareto Front Inference]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766029646966-1d711f8a-2f99-4a62-931f-c87b2f875e3e/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa330</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Organisms face tradeoffs in performing multiple tasks. Identifying the optimal phenotypes maximizing the organismal fitness (or Pareto front) and inferring the relevant tasks allow testing phenotypic adaptations and help delineate evolutionary constraints, tradeoffs, and critical fitness components, so are of broad interest. It has been proposed that Pareto fronts can be identified from high-dimensional phenotypic data, including molecular phenotypes such as gene expression levels, by fitting polytopes (lines, triangles, tetrahedrons, and so on), and a program named ParTI was recently introduced for this purpose. ParTI has identified Pareto fronts and inferred phenotypes best for individual tasks (or archetypes) from numerous data sets such as the beak morphologies of Darwin’s finches and mRNA concentrations in human tumors, implying evolutionary optimizations of the involved traits. Nevertheless, the reliabilities of these findings are unknown. Using real and simulated data that lack evolutionary optimization, we here report extremely high false-positive rates of ParTI. The errors arise from phylogenetic relationships or population structures of the organisms analyzed and the flexibility of data analysis in ParTI that is equivalent to <i>p</i>-hacking. Because these problems are virtually universal, our findings cast doubt on almost all ParTI-based results and suggest that reliably identifying Pareto fronts and archetypes from high-dimensional phenotypic data are currently generally difficult.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-12-21T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Properties of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Performance across Many Empirical Alignments]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766029569472-624c68ce-4d2c-4d4d-8a42-2d2a5b26b4c6/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa295</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Nearly all current Bayesian phylogenetic applications rely on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to approximate the posterior distribution for trees and other parameters of the model. These approximations are only reliable if Markov chains adequately converge and sample from the joint posterior distribution. Although several studies of phylogenetic MCMC convergence exist, these have focused on simulated data sets or select empirical examples. Therefore, much that is considered common knowledge about MCMC in empirical systems derives from a relatively small family of analyses under ideal conditions. To address this, we present an overview of commonly applied phylogenetic MCMC diagnostics and an assessment of patterns of these diagnostics across more than 18,000 empirical analyses. Many analyses appeared to perform well and failures in convergence were most likely to be detected using the average standard deviation of split frequencies, a diagnostic that compares topologies among independent chains. Different diagnostics yielded different information about failed convergence, demonstrating that multiple diagnostics must be employed to reliably detect problems. The number of taxa and average branch lengths in analyses have clear impacts on MCMC performance, with more taxa and shorter branches leading to more difficult convergence. We show that the usage of models that include both Γ-distributed among-site rate variation and a proportion of invariable sites is not broadly problematic for MCMC convergence but is also unnecessary. Changes to heating and the usage of model-averaged substitution models can both offer improved convergence in some cases, but neither are a panacea.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-11-13T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Special Care Is Needed in Applying Phylogenetic Comparative Methods to Gene Trees with Speciation and Duplication Nodes]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766029242786-54e0f990-4906-4836-8f98-a5f5682eda61/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa288</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">How gene function evolves is a central question of evolutionary biology. It can be investigated by comparing functional genomics results between species and between genes. Most comparative studies of functional genomics have used pairwise comparisons. Yet it has been shown that this can provide biased results, as genes, like species, are phylogenetically related. Phylogenetic comparative methods should be used to correct for this, but they depend on strong assumptions, including unbiased tree estimates relative to the hypothesis being tested. Such methods have recently been used to test the “ortholog conjecture,” the hypothesis that functional evolution is faster in paralogs than in orthologs. Although pairwise comparisons of tissue specificity (τ<div class="imageVideo"><img src="" alt=""/></div>) provided support for the ortholog conjecture, phylogenetic independent contrasts did not. Our reanalysis on the same gene trees identified problems with the time calibration of duplication nodes. We find that the gene trees used suffer from important biases, due to the inclusion of trees with no duplication nodes, to the relative age of speciations and duplications, to systematic differences in branch lengths, and to non-Brownian motion of tissue specificity on many trees. We find that incorrect implementation of phylogenetic method in empirical gene trees with duplications can be problematic. Controlling for biases allows successful use of phylogenetic methods to study the evolution of gene function and provides some support for the ortholog conjecture using three different phylogenetic approaches.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-11-10T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Log Transformation Improves Dating of Phylogenies]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766000582944-ce8b530e-3895-43f4-8847-03bf5678b176/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa222</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Phylogenetic trees inferred from sequence data often have branch lengths measured in the expected number of substitutions and therefore, do not have divergence times estimated. These trees give an incomplete view of evolutionary histories since many applications of phylogenies require time trees. Many methods have been developed to convert the inferred branch lengths from substitution unit to time unit using calibration points, but none is universally accepted as they are challenged in both scalability and accuracy under complex models. Here, we introduce a new method that formulates dating as a nonconvex optimization problem where the variance of log-transformed rate multipliers is minimized across the tree. On simulated and real data, we show that our method, wLogDate, is often more accurate than alternatives and is more robust to various model assumptions.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-09-04T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[A Bayesian Mutation–Selection Framework for Detecting Site-Specific Adaptive Evolution in Protein-Coding Genes]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765995926431-823af0eb-6336-46c4-9488-e5268f8cf5e4/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa265</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">In recent years, codon substitution models based on the mutation–selection principle have been extended for the purpose of detecting signatures of adaptive evolution in protein-coding genes. However, the approaches used to date have either focused on detecting global signals of adaptive regimes—across the entire gene—or on contexts where experimentally derived, site-specific amino acid fitness profiles are available. Here, we present a Bayesian site-heterogeneous mutation–selection framework for site-specific detection of adaptive substitution regimes given a protein-coding DNA alignment. We offer implementations, briefly present simulation results, and apply the approach on a few real data sets. Our analyses suggest that the new approach shows greater sensitivity than traditional methods. However, more study is required to assess the impact of potential model violations on the method, and gain a greater empirical sense its behavior on a broader range of real data sets. We propose an outline of such a research program.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-10-12T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Discovery of Ongoing Selective Sweeps within <i>Anopheles</i> Mosquito Populations Using Deep Learning]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765994738139-34f25862-cd21-4051-926d-d4da77462b6d/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa259</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Identification of partial sweeps, which include both hard and soft sweeps that have not currently reached fixation, provides crucial information about ongoing evolutionary responses. To this end, we introduce <i>partialS/HIC</i>, a deep learning method to discover selective sweeps from population genomic data. <i>partialS/HIC</i> uses a convolutional neural network for image processing, which is trained with a large suite of summary statistics derived from coalescent simulations incorporating population-specific history, to distinguish between completed versus partial sweeps, hard versus soft sweeps, and regions directly affected by selection versus those merely linked to nearby selective sweeps. We perform several simulation experiments under various demographic scenarios to demonstrate <i>partialS/HIC</i>’s performance, which exhibits excellent resolution for detecting partial sweeps. We also apply our classifier to whole genomes from eight mosquito populations sampled across sub-Saharan Africa by the <i>Anopheles gambiae</i> 1000 Genomes Consortium, elucidating both continent-wide patterns as well as sweeps unique to specific geographic regions. These populations have experienced intense insecticide exposure over the past two decades, and we observe a strong overrepresentation of sweeps at insecticide resistance loci. Our analysis thus provides a list of candidate adaptive loci that may be relevant to mosquito control efforts. More broadly, our supervised machine learning approach introduces a method to distinguish between completed and partial sweeps, as well as between hard and soft sweeps, under a variety of demographic scenarios. As whole-genome data rapidly accumulate for a greater diversity of organisms, <i>partialS/HIC</i> addresses an increasing demand for useful selection scan tools that can track in-progress evolutionary dynamics.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-10-06T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Learning Retention Mechanisms and Evolutionary Parameters of Duplicate Genes from Their Expression Data]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765993458804-7568aec4-0386-42c7-806d-54f8dae98f4c/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa267</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Learning about the roles that duplicate genes play in the origins of novel phenotypes requires an understanding of how their functions evolve. A previous method for achieving this goal, CDROM, employs gene expression distances as proxies for functional divergence and then classifies the evolutionary mechanisms retaining duplicate genes from comparisons of these distances in a decision tree framework. However, CDROM does not account for stochastic shifts in gene expression or leverage advances in contemporary statistical learning for performing classification, nor is it capable of predicting the parameters driving duplicate gene evolution. Thus, here we develop CLOUD, a multi-layer neural network built on a model of gene expression evolution that can both classify duplicate gene retention mechanisms and predict their underlying evolutionary parameters. We show that not only is the CLOUD classifier substantially more powerful and accurate than CDROM, but that it also yields accurate parameter predictions, enabling a better understanding of the specific forces driving the evolution and long-term retention of duplicate genes. Further, application of the CLOUD classifier and predictor to empirical data from <i>Drosophila</i> recapitulates many previous findings about gene duplication in this lineage, showing that new functions often emerge rapidly and asymmetrically in younger duplicate gene copies, and that functional divergence is driven by strong natural selection. Hence, CLOUD represents a major advancement in classifying retention mechanisms and predicting evolutionary parameters of duplicate genes, thereby highlighting the utility of incorporating sophisticated statistical learning techniques to address long-standing questions about evolution after gene duplication.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-10-12T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Contrast-FEL—A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765993438709-d1bda918-8a7b-4841-970d-995a40bb1bae/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa263</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">A number of evolutionary hypotheses can be tested by comparing selective pressures among sets of branches in a phylogenetic tree. When the question of interest is to identify specific sites within genes that may be evolving differently, a common approach is to perform separate analyses on subsets of sequences and compare parameter estimates in a post hoc fashion. This approach is statistically suboptimal and not always applicable. Here, we develop a simple extension of a popular fixed effects likelihood method in the context of codon-based evolutionary phylogenetic maximum likelihood testing, Contrast-FEL. It is suitable for identifying individual alignment sites where any among the K≥2<div class="imageVideo"><img src="" alt=""/></div> sets of branches in a phylogenetic tree have detectably different <i>ω</i> ratios, indicative of different selective regimes. Using extensive simulations, we show that Contrast-FEL delivers good power, exceeding 90% for sufficiently large differences, while maintaining tight control over false positive rates, when the model is correctly specified. We conclude by applying Contrast-FEL to data from five previously published studies spanning a diverse range of organisms and focusing on different evolutionary questions.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-10-16T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Signatures of Introgression across the Allele Frequency Spectrum]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765837786018-71e84e9d-9ad1-4321-af2b-e2a6cf4e1d3a/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa239</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">The detection of introgression from genomic data is transforming our view of species and the origins of adaptive variation. Among the most widely used approaches to detect introgression is the so-called ABBA–BABA test or <i>D-</i>statistic, which identifies excess allele sharing between nonsister taxa. Part of the appeal of <i>D</i> is its simplicity, but this also limits its informativeness, particularly about the timing and direction of introgression. Here we present a simple extension, <i>D</i> frequency spectrum or <i>D</i><sub>FS</sub>, in which <i>D</i> is partitioned according to the frequencies of derived alleles. We use simulations over a large parameter space to show how <i>D</i><sub>FS</sub> carries information about various factors. In particular, recent introgression reliably leads to a peak in <i>D</i><sub>FS</sub> among low-frequency derived alleles, whereas violation of model assumptions can lead to a lack of signal at low frequencies. We also reanalyze published empirical data from six different animal and plant taxa, and interpret the results in the light of our simulations, showing how <i>D</i><sub>FS</sub> provides novel insights. We currently see <i>D</i><sub>FS</sub> as a descriptive tool that will augment both simple and sophisticated tests for introgression, but in the future it may be usefully incorporated into probabilistic inference frameworks.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-09-17T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Flexible Mixture Model Approaches That Accommodate Footprint Size Variability for Robust Detection of Balancing Selection]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765799289167-d36031e1-4b4e-411d-b8cf-fb9422cbc3ea/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa134</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">Long-term balancing selection typically leaves narrow footprints of increased genetic diversity, and therefore most detection approaches only achieve optimal performances when sufficiently small genomic regions (i.e., windows) are examined. Such methods are sensitive to window sizes and suffer substantial losses in power when windows are large. Here, we employ mixture models to construct a set of five composite likelihood ratio test statistics, which we collectively term <i>B</i> statistics. These statistics are agnostic to window sizes and can operate on diverse forms of input data. Through simulations, we show that they exhibit comparable power to the best-performing current methods, and retain substantially high power regardless of window sizes. They also display considerable robustness to high mutation rates and uneven recombination landscapes, as well as an array of other common confounding scenarios. Moreover, we applied a specific version of the <i>B</i> statistics, termed <i>B</i><sub>2</sub>, to a human population-genomic data set and recovered many top candidates from prior studies, including the then-uncharacterized <i>STPG2</i> and <i>CCDC169</i>–<i>SOHLH2</i>, both of which are related to gamete functions. We further applied <i>B</i><sub>2</sub> on a bonobo population-genomic data set. In addition to the <i>MHC-DQ</i> genes, we uncovered several novel candidate genes, such as <i>KLRD1</i>, involved in viral defense, and <i>SCN9A</i>, associated with pain perception. Finally, we show that our methods can be extended to account for multiallelic balancing selection and integrated the set of statistics into open-source software named BalLeRMix for future applications by the scientific community.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-10-04T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Unsupervised Inference of Protein Fitness Landscape from Deep Mutational Scan]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765744701626-65f16bcb-0369-4c20-9760-53527843f761/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1093/molbev/msaa204</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65541">The recent technological advances underlying the screening of large combinatorial libraries in high-throughput mutational scans deepen our understanding of adaptive protein evolution and boost its applications in protein design. Nevertheless, the large number of possible genotypes requires suitable computational methods for data analysis, the prediction of mutational effects, and the generation of optimized sequences. We describe a computational method that, trained on sequencing samples from multiple rounds of a screening experiment, provides a model of the genotype–fitness relationship. We tested the method on five large-scale mutational scans, yielding accurate predictions of the mutational effects on fitness. The inferred fitness landscape is robust to experimental and sampling noise and exhibits high generalization power in terms of broader sequence space exploration and higher fitness variant predictions. We investigate the role of epistasis and show that the inferred model provides structural information about the 3D contacts in the molecular fold.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-08-08T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>