<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:ynews="http://news.yahoo.com/rss/">
    <channel>
        <title>Nova Reader - Subject</title>
        <link>https://www.novareader.co</link>
        <description>Default RSS Feed</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Newgen KnowledgeWorks</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Association of Race/Ethnicity and Social Disadvantage With Autism Prevalence in 7 Million School Children in England]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766028589257-e3bc609c-c460-4089-b429-3a84535af93f/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0054</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-1"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-1">Question</h3><p class="para" id="N65546">What is the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the total English state school population, and what are the social determinants associated with ASD status?</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-2"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-2">Findings</h3><p class="para" id="N65552">In this ASD prevalence cohort study of 7 047 238 pupils, national English prevalence was 1.76%, with marked differences according to racial/ethnic group. The highest prevalence was found in Black pupils (2.11%) and the lowest in Roma/Irish Travelers (0.85%), with important variability across geographic areas.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-3"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-3">Meaning</h3><p class="para" id="N65558">These results show differences in ASD prevalence estimates across racial/ethnic minority groups in England, which could be attributable to diagnostic biases, possible differences in detection and referral, or differential phenotypic prevalence for racial/ethnic minority groups.</p></div><p class="para" id="N65540">This national cohort study evaluates whether socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with autism spectrum disorder prevalence and the likelihood of accessing autism services in racial/ethnic minority groups and disadvantaged groups among school pupils in England.</p><div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-4"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-1">Importance</h3><p class="para" id="N65543">The global prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been reported to be between 1% and 2% of the population, with little research in Black, Asian, and other racial/ethnic minority groups. Accurate estimates of ASD prevalence are vital to planning diagnostic, educational, health, and social care services and may detect possible access barriers to diagnostic pathways and services and inequalities based on social determinants of health.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-5"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-2">Objective</h3><p class="para" id="N65549">To evaluate whether socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with ASD prevalence and the likelihood of accessing ASD services in racial/ethnic minority and disadvantaged groups in England.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-6"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-3">Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><p class="para" id="N65555">This case-control prevalence cohort study used the Spring School Census 2017 from the Pupil Level Annual Schools Census of the National Pupil Database, which is a total population sample that includes all English children, adolescents, and young adults aged 2 to 21 years in state-funded education. Data were collected on January 17, 2017, and analyzed from August 2, 2018, to January 28, 2020.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-7"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-4">Exposures</h3><p class="para" id="N65561">Age and sex were treated as a priori confounders while assessing correlates of ASD status according to (1) race/ethnicity, (2) social disadvantage, (3) first language spoken, (4) Education, Health and Care Plan or ASD Special Educational Needs and Disability support status, and (5) mediation analysis to assess how social disadvantage and language might affect ASD status.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-8"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-5">Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><p class="para" id="N65567">Sex- and age-standardized ASD prevalence by race/ethnicity and 326 English local authority districts in pupils aged 5 to 19 years.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-9"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-6">Results</h3><p class="para" id="N65573">The final population sample consisted of 7 047 238 pupils (50.99% male; mean [SD] age, 10.18 [3.47] years) and included 119 821 pupils with ASD, of whom 21 660 also had learning difficulties (18.08%). The standardized prevalence of ASD was 1.76% (95% CI, 1.75%-1.77%), with male pupils showing a prevalence of 2.81% (95% CI, 2.79%-2.83%) and female pupils a prevalence of 0.65% (95% CI, 0.64%-0.66%), for a male-to-female ratio (MFR) of 4.32:1. Standardized prevalence was highest in Black pupils (2.11% [95% CI, 2.06%-2.16%]; MFR, 4.68:1) and lowest in Roma/Irish Travelers (0.85% [95% CI, 0.67%-1.03%]; MFR, 2.84:1). Pupils with ASD were more likely to face social disadvantage (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.59-1.63) and to speak English as an additional language (adjusted prevalence ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.63-0.65). The effect of race/ethnicity on ASD status was mediated mostly through social disadvantage, with Black pupils having the largest effect (standardized mediation coefficient, 0.018; <i>P</i> &lt; .001) and 12.41% of indirect effects through this way.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi210003-10"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-7">Conclusions and Relevance</h3><p class="para" id="N65582">These findings suggest that significant differences in ASD prevalence exist across racial/ethnic groups and geographic areas and local authority districts, indicating possible differential phenotypic prevalence or differences in detection or referral for racial/ethnic minority groups.</p></div>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-03-29T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Effect of Enteral Lipid Supplement on Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765834397984-e0ad57ea-8720-4092-b0fe-42044c5a551b/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5653</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-1"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-1">Question</h3><p class="para" id="N65546">Does enteral fatty acid supplementation with arachidonic acid (AA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) from birth to 40 weeks’ postmenstrual age reduce severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in extremely preterm infants?</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-2"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-2">Findings</h3><p class="para" id="N65552">This randomized clinical trial found that enteral AA and DHA supplementation lowered the risk of severe ROP by 50%. In addition, the group that received enteral AA and DHA supplementation showed higher serum levels of both AA and DHA compared with controls.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-3"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-3">Meaning</h3><p class="para" id="N65558">Supplementing the diet of the most immature infants born at less than 27 weeks’ gestational age with an enteral lipid solution with AA:DHA had no significant adverse effects and seems to be a promising intervention to prevent sight-threatening ROP and thereby reduce visual impartment and blindness.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-4"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-1">Importance</h3><p class="para" id="N65543">Lack of arachidonic acid (AA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) after extremely preterm birth may contribute to preterm morbidity, including retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-5"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-2">Objective</h3><p class="para" id="N65549">To determine whether enteral supplementation with fatty acids from birth to 40 weeks’ postmenstrual age reduces ROP in extremely preterm infants.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-6"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-3">Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><p class="para" id="N65555">The Mega Donna Mega trial, a randomized clinical trial, was a multicenter study performed at 3 university hospitals in Sweden from December 15, 2016, to December 15, 2019. The screening pediatric ophthalmologists were masked to patient groupings. A total of 209 infants born at less than 28 weeks’ gestation were tested for eligibility, and 206 infants were included. Efficacy analyses were performed on as-randomized groups on the intention-to-treat population and on the per-protocol population using as-treated groups. Statistical analyses were performed from February to April 2020.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-7"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-4">Interventions</h3><p class="para" id="N65561">Infants received either supplementation with an enteral oil providing AA (100 mg/kg/d) and DHA (50 mg/kg/d) (AA:DHA group) or no supplementation within 3 days after birth until 40 weeks’ postmenstrual age.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-8"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-5">Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><p class="para" id="N65567">The primary outcome was severe ROP (stage 3 and/or type 1). The secondary outcomes were AA and DHA serum levels and rates of other complications of preterm birth.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-9"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-6">Results</h3><p class="para" id="N65573">A total of 101 infants (58 boys [57.4%]; mean [SD] gestational age, 25.5 [1.5] weeks) were included in the AA:DHA group, and 105 infants (59 boys [56.2%]; mean [SD] gestational age, 25.5 [1.4] weeks) were included in the control group. Treatment with AA and DHA reduced severe ROP compared with the standard of care (16 of 101 [15.8%] in the AA:DHA group vs 35 of 105 [33.3%] in the control group; adjusted relative risk, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.28-0.91]; <i>P</i> = .02). The AA:DHA group had significantly higher fractions of AA and DHA in serum phospholipids compared with controls (overall mean difference in AA:DHA group, 0.82 mol% [95% CI, 0.46-1.18 mol%]; <i>P</i> &lt; .001; overall mean difference in control group, 0.13 mol% [95% CI, 0.01-0.24 mol%]; <i>P</i> = .03). There were no significant differences between the AA:DHA group and the control group in the rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (48 of 101 [47.5%] vs 48 of 105 [45.7%]) and of any grade of intraventricular hemorrhage (43 of 101 [42.6%] vs 42 of 105 [40.0%]). In the AA:DHA group and control group, respectively, sepsis occurred in 42 of 101 infants (41.6%) and 53 of 105 infants (50.5%), serious adverse events occurred in 26 of 101 infants (25.7%) and 26 of 105 infants (24.8%), and 16 of 101 infants (15.8%) and 13 of 106 infants (12.3%) died.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-10"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-7">Conclusions and Relevance</h3><p class="para" id="N65588">This study found that, compared with standard of care, enteral AA:DHA supplementation lowered the risk of severe ROP by 50% and showed overall higher serum levels of both AA and DHA. Enteral lipid supplementation with AA:DHA is a novel preventive strategy to decrease severe ROP in extremely preterm infants.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200091-11"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-8">Trial Registration</h3><p class="para" id="N65594">ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03201588</p></div><p class="para" id="N65540">This randomized clinical trial examines whether enteral supplementation with arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid from birth to 40 weeks’ postmenstrual age reduces retinopathy of prematurity in extremely preterm infants.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-02-01T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Prevalence and Childhood Precursors of Opioid Use in the Early Decades of Life]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765739280262-e36bb885-c951-4066-b1e4-deb5f81a41e5/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5205</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-1"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-1">Question</h3><p class="para" id="N65546">How common is opioid use in the early decades of life, and which childhood risk factors are associated with opioid use in young adulthood?</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-2"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-2">Findings</h3><p class="para" id="N65552">This cohort study assessed opioid use among 1252 non-Hispanic White individuals and American Indian individuals in rural counties in the central Appalachia region of North Carolina from January 1993 to December 2015. By age 30 years, approximately one-quarter of participants had used opioids, and the findings revealed that childhood tobacco use and depression were associated with later nonheroin opioid use in general, weekly nonheroin opioid use, and heroin use.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-3"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-3">Meaning</h3><p class="para" id="N65558">Childhood tobacco use and depression may be associated with impaired reward system functioning, which may increase young adults’ vulnerability to opioid-associated euphoria.</p></div><p class="para" id="N65540">This cohort study documents age-related changes in opioid use and analyzes childhood antecedents of opioid use among non-Hispanic White individuals and American Indian individuals.</p><div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-4"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-1">Importance</h3><p class="para" id="N65543">Opioid use disorder and opioid deaths have increased dramatically in young adults in the US, but the age-related course or precursors to opioid use among young people are not fully understood.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-5"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-2">Objective</h3><p class="para" id="N65549">To document age-related changes in opioid use and study the childhood antecedents of opioid use by age 30 years in 6 domains of childhood risk: sociodemographic characteristics; school or peer problems; parental mental illness, drug problems, or legal involvement; substance use; psychiatric illness; and physical health.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-6"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-3">Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><p class="para" id="N65555">This community-representative prospective longitudinal cohort study assessed 1252 non-Hispanic White individuals and American Indian individuals in rural counties in the central Appalachia region of North Carolina from January 1993 to December 2015. Data were analyzed from January 2019 to January 2020.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-7"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-4">Exposures</h3><p class="para" id="N65561">Between ages 9 and 16 years, participants and their parents were interviewed up to 7 times using the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment and reported risk factors in 6 risk domains.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-8"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-5">Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><p class="para" id="N65567">Participants were assessed again at ages 19, 21, 25, and 30 years for nonheroin opioid use (any and weekly) and heroin use using the structured Young Adult Psychiatric Assessment.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-9"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-6">Results</h3><p class="para" id="N65573">Of 1252 participants, 342 (27%) were American Indian. By age 30 years, 322 participants had used a nonheroin opioid (24.2%; 95% CI, 21.8-26.5), 155 had used a nonheroin opioid weekly (8.8%; 95% CI, 7.2-10.3), and 95 had used heroin (6.6%; 95% CI, 5.2-7.9). Childhood risk markers for later opioid use included male sex, tobacco use, depression, conduct disorder, cannabis use, having peers exhibiting social deviance, parents with legal involvement, and elevated systemic inflammation. In final models, childhood tobacco use, depression, and cannabis use were most robustly associated with opioid use in young adulthood (ages 19 to 30 years). Chronic depression and dysthymia were strongly associated with any nonheroin opioid use (OR. 5.43; 95% CI, 2.35-12.55 and OR, 7.13; 95% CI, 1.99-25.60, respectively) and with weekly nonheroin opioid use (OR, 8.89; 95% CI, 3.61-21.93 and OR, 11.51; 95% CI, 3.05-42.72, respectively). Among young adults with opioid use, those with heroin use had the highest rates of childhood psychiatric disorders and comorbidities.</p></div><div class="section" id="ab-poi200082-10"><h3 class="BHead" id="nov000-7">Conclusions and Relevance</h3><p class="para" id="N65579">Childhood tobacco use and chronic depression may be associated with impaired reward system functioning, which may increase young adults’ vulnerability to opioid-associated euphoria. Preventing and treating early substance use and childhood mental illness may help prevent later opioid use.</p></div>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-12-28T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>