<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:ynews="http://news.yahoo.com/rss/">
    <channel>
        <title>Nova Reader - Subject</title>
        <link>https://www.novareader.co</link>
        <description>Default RSS Feed</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Newgen KnowledgeWorks</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Loss of CBX2 induces genome instability and senescence-associated chromosomal rearrangements]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766056428900-b4d43353-8deb-4785-9b1a-b016e5aaccac/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.201910149</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Polycomb group proteins play important roles in developmental and cell proliferation processes. Baumann et al. demonstrate that the PRC1 protein CBX2 is critical for heterochromatin homeostasis, chromosome stability, and the prevention of premature cellular senescence.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">The polycomb group protein CBX2 is an important epigenetic reader involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. While CBX2 overexpression occurs in a wide range of human tumors, targeted deletion results in homeotic transformation, proliferative defects, and premature senescence. However, its cellular function(s) and whether it plays a role in maintenance of genome stability remain to be determined. Here, we demonstrate that loss of CBX2 in mouse fibroblasts induces abnormal large-scale chromatin structure and chromosome instability. Integrative transcriptome analysis and ATAC-seq revealed a significant dysregulation of transcripts involved in DNA repair, chromocenter formation, and tumorigenesis in addition to changes in chromatin accessibility of genes involved in lateral sclerosis, basal transcription factors, and folate metabolism. Notably, Cbx2<sup>−/−</sup> cells exhibit prominent decondensation of satellite DNA sequences at metaphase and increased sister chromatid recombination events leading to rampant chromosome instability. The presence of extensive centromere and telomere defects suggests a prominent role for CBX2 in heterochromatin homeostasis and the regulation of nuclear architecture.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-09-01T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Cell division requires RNA eviction from condensing chromosomes]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766056411802-139526b2-3f4e-4711-9363-d046bcea90ee/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.201910148</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Sharp et al. investigate cell cycle control of chromatin-associated RNP complexes. They find that Aurora-B and SAF-A control the redistribution of RNAs away from chromosomes in mitosis. This early mitotic chromosomal remodeling process is required for the fidelity of chromosome segregation.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">During mitosis, the genome is transformed from a decondensed, transcriptionally active state to a highly condensed, transcriptionally inactive state. Mitotic chromosome reorganization is marked by the general attenuation of transcription on chromosome arms, yet how the cell regulates nuclear and chromatin-associated RNAs after chromosome condensation and nuclear envelope breakdown is unknown. SAF-A/hnRNPU is an abundant nuclear protein with RNA-to-DNA tethering activity, coordinated by two spatially distinct nucleic acid–binding domains. Here we show that RNA is evicted from prophase chromosomes through Aurora-B–dependent phosphorylation of the SAF-A DNA-binding domain; failure to execute this pathway leads to accumulation of SAF-A–RNA complexes on mitotic chromosomes, defects in metaphase chromosome alignment, and elevated rates of chromosome missegregation in anaphase. This work reveals a role for Aurora-B in removing chromatin-associated RNAs during prophase and demonstrates that Aurora-B–dependent relocalization of SAF-A during cell division contributes to the fidelity of chromosome segregation.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-10-08T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[G1/S transcription factors assemble in increasing numbers of discrete clusters through G1 phase]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765973549167-2f9a8f54-f13f-4c7c-8c54-8ffa7c71ed03/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202003041</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Super-resolution imaging shows that G1/S transcription factors in budding yeast are spatially organized in small clusters that increase in number, not molecular content, as the transcription factor copy number increases with cell growth in G1. This spatial and temporal organization of the G1/S regulon might help coordinate the Start transition.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">In budding yeast, the transcription factors SBF and MBF activate a large program of gene expression in late G1 phase that underlies commitment to cell division, termed Start. SBF/MBF are limiting with respect to target promoters in small G1 phase cells and accumulate as cells grow, raising the questions of how SBF/MBF are dynamically distributed across the G1/S regulon and how this impacts the Start transition. Super-resolution Photo-Activatable Localization Microscopy (PALM) mapping of the static positions of SBF/MBF subunits in fixed cells revealed each transcription factor was organized into discrete clusters containing approximately eight copies regardless of cell size and that the total number of clusters increased as cells grew through G1 phase. Stochastic modeling using reasonable biophysical parameters recapitulated growth-dependent SBF/MBF clustering and predicted TF dynamics that were confirmed in live cell PALM experiments. This spatio-temporal organization of SBF/MBF may help coordinate activation of G1/S regulon and the Start transition.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-08-03T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Induction of spontaneous human neocentromere formation and long-term maturation]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765839225366-5156d1e1-ed64-43cc-9683-394eeedd0d99/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202007210</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Murillo-Pineda et al. report a chromosome engineering system for human neocentromere formation and characterize the first experimentally generated human neocentromere. Neocentromere formation promotes local H3K9me3 eviction and cohesin and RNA polymerase II recruitment. Long-term culture results in gradual maturation of the inner centromere.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">Human centromeres form primarily on α-satellite DNA but sporadically arise de novo at naive ectopic loci, creating neocentromeres. Centromere inheritance is driven primarily by chromatin containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A. Here, we report a chromosome engineering system for neocentromere formation in human cells and characterize the first experimentally induced human neocentromere at a naive locus. The spontaneously formed neocentromere spans a gene-poor 100-kb domain enriched in histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylated (H3K9me3). Long-read sequencing revealed this neocentromere was formed by purely epigenetic means and assembly of a functional kinetochore correlated with CENP-A seeding, eviction of H3K9me3 and local accumulation of mitotic cohesin and RNA polymerase II. At formation, the young neocentromere showed markedly reduced chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) occupancy and poor sister chromatin cohesion. However, long-term tracking revealed increased CPC assembly and low-level transcription providing evidence for centromere maturation over time.</p><p class="para" id="N65542"><div class="section" id="GA"><div class="img"><div class="imgeVideo"><div class="img-fullscreenIcon" onClick="javascript:showImageContent('GA');"><img src="/public/images/journalImg/fullscreen.png"/></div><div class="imageVideo"><img src="/dataresources/secured/content-1765839225366-5156d1e1-ed64-43cc-9683-394eeedd0d99/assets/JCB_202007210_GA.jpg" alt=""/></div></div></div></div></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-01-14T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>