<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:ynews="http://news.yahoo.com/rss/">
    <channel>
        <title>Nova Reader - Subject</title>
        <link>https://www.novareader.co</link>
        <description>Default RSS Feed</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Newgen KnowledgeWorks</copyright>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Centromeric transcription maintains centromeric cohesion in human cells]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766066538677-d77b8607-3e98-496f-98c8-e6d4b04e7520/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202008146</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Centromeric transcription is critical for proper centromere function, but its exact role remains elusive. By manipulating the activity of centromeric transcription, Chen et al. report that a major function of centromeric transcription in human cells is to maintain centromeric cohesion.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">Centromeric transcription has been shown to play an important role in centromere functions. However, lack of approaches to specifically manipulate centromeric transcription calls into question that the proposed functions are a direct consequence of centromeric transcription. By monitoring nascent RNAs, we found that several transcriptional inhibitors exhibited distinct, even opposing, efficacies on the suppression of ongoing gene and centromeric transcription in human cells, whereas under the same conditions, total centromeric RNAs were changed to a lesser extent. The inhibitor suppressing ongoing centromeric transcription weakened centromeric cohesion, whereas the inhibitor increasing ongoing centromeric transcription strengthened centromeric cohesion. Furthermore, expression of CENP-B DNA-binding domain or CENP-B knockdown moderately increased centromeric transcription without altering gene transcription; as a result, centromeric cohesion was accordingly strengthened. Targeting of the Kox1-KRAB domain with CENP-B DB to centromeres specifically decreased centromeric transcription and weakened centromeric cohesion. Thus, based on these findings, we propose that a major function of centromeric transcription is to maintain centromeric cohesion in human cells.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-04-21T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[SUMOylation stabilizes sister kinetochore biorientation to allow timely anaphase]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766065385387-49e0f1a6-75b5-4db3-92a8-a5ff60e7a55d/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202005130</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Su et al. show that SUMOylation stabilizes bioriented kinetochore–microtubule attachments in mitosis to allow timely anaphase onset. They identify the shugoshin pericentromeric adaptor protein and the chromosome passenger complex as SUMOylation targets, which lead to dampening of error correction pathways.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">During mitosis, sister chromatids attach to microtubules from opposite poles, called biorientation. Sister chromatid cohesion resists microtubule forces, generating tension, which provides the signal that biorientation has occurred. How tension silences the surveillance pathways that prevent cell cycle progression and correct erroneous kinetochore–microtubule attachments remains unclear. Here we show that SUMOylation dampens error correction to allow stable sister kinetochore biorientation and timely anaphase onset. The Siz1/Siz2 SUMO ligases modify the pericentromere-localized shugoshin (Sgo1) protein before its tension-dependent release from chromatin. Sgo1 SUMOylation reduces its binding to protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), and weakening of this interaction is important for stable biorientation. Unstable biorientation in SUMO-deficient cells is associated with persistence of the chromosome passenger complex (CPC) at centromeres, and SUMOylation of CPC subunit Bir1 also contributes to timely anaphase onset. We propose that SUMOylation acts in a combinatorial manner to facilitate dismantling of the error correction machinery within pericentromeres and thereby sharpen the metaphase–anaphase transition.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-04-30T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Aurora B switches relative strength of kinetochore–microtubule attachment modes for error correction]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766061051908-b8954566-b95a-4ed0-abfb-5f6bc6d9c8cd/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202011117</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Doodhi et al. reconstitute the yeast kinetochore–microtubule interface in vitro and compare the relative strength of distinct kinetochore–microtubule interaction modes. Their results suggest how Aurora B kinase promotes the exchange of kinetochore–microtubule interactions to eliminate aberrant interactions and establish chromosome biorientation.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">To establish chromosome biorientation, aberrant kinetochore–microtubule interaction must be resolved (error correction) by Aurora B kinase. Aurora B differentially regulates kinetochore attachment to the microtubule plus end and its lateral side (end-on and lateral attachment, respectively). However, it is still unclear how kinetochore–microtubule interactions are exchanged during error correction. Here, we reconstituted the budding yeast kinetochore–microtubule interface in vitro by attaching the Ndc80 complexes to nanobeads. These Ndc80C nanobeads recapitulated in vitro the lateral and end-on attachments of authentic kinetochores on dynamic microtubules loaded with the Dam1 complex. This in vitro assay enabled the direct comparison of lateral and end-on attachment strength and showed that Dam1 phosphorylation by Aurora B makes the end-on attachment weaker than the lateral attachment. Similar reconstitutions with purified kinetochore particles were used for comparison. We suggest the Dam1 phosphorylation weakens interaction with the Ndc80 complex, disrupts the end-on attachment, and promotes the exchange to a new lateral attachment, leading to error correction.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-04-14T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[DNA topoisomerase 3 is required for efficient germ cell quality control]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766060010541-beb4309d-fd7a-4611-a890-82a1b2bff3da/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202012057</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Dello Stritto et al. provide evidence that DNA lesions in both germline mitotic and meiotic compartments are less capable of triggering apoptosis in the absence of topoisomerase 3. In topoisomerase 3 mutants, uncontrolled bloom helicase activity governs repair of defective recombination intermediates to evade apoptosis.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">An important quality control mechanism eliminates meiocytes that have experienced recombination failure during meiosis. The culling of defective oocytes in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i> meiosis resembles late oocyte elimination in female mammals. Here we show that topoisomerase 3 depletion generates DNA lesions in both germline mitotic and meiotic compartments that are less capable of triggering p53 (<i>cep-1</i>)–dependent apoptosis, despite the activation of DNA damage and apoptosis signaling. Elimination of nonhomologous, alternative end joining and single strand annealing repair factors (CKU-70, CKU-80, POLQ-1, and XPF-1) can alleviate the apoptosis block. Remarkably, the ability of single mutants in the other members of the Bloom helicase-topoisomerase-RMI1 complex to elicit apoptosis is not compromised, and depletion of Bloom helicase in topoisomerase 3 mutants restores an effective apoptotic response. Therefore, uncontrolled Bloom helicase activity seems to direct DNA repair toward normally not used repair pathways, and this counteracts efficient apoptosis. This implicates an as-yet undescribed requirement for topoisomerase 3 in mounting an effective apoptotic response to ensure germ cell quality control.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-04-02T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Spatial and temporal control of targeting Polo-like kinase during meiotic prophase]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766056360811-e23a75bc-1dd2-4667-b902-45417c89151a/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202006094</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Brandt et al. establish mechanisms that target Polo-like kinase during meiotic prophase in <i>C. elegans</i>. CDK-1 phosphorylates a synaptonemal complex component, SYP-1, to generate docking sites for PLK-2, whose association is prevented until crossover formation to ensure homologue pairing, synapsis, and chromosome remodeling.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">Polo-like kinases (PLKs) play widely conserved roles in orchestrating meiotic chromosome dynamics. However, how PLKs are targeted to distinct subcellular localizations during meiotic progression remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK-1 primes the recruitment of PLK-2 to the synaptonemal complex (SC) through phosphorylation of SYP-1 in <i>C. elegans</i>. SYP-1 phosphorylation by CDK-1 occurs just before meiotic onset. However, PLK-2 docking to the SC is prevented by the nucleoplasmic HAL-2/3 complex until crossover designation, which constrains PLK-2 to special chromosomal regions known as pairing centers to ensure proper homologue pairing and synapsis. PLK-2 is targeted to crossover sites primed by CDK-1 and spreads along the SC by reinforcing SYP-1 phosphorylation on one side of each crossover only when threshold levels of crossovers are generated. Thus, the integration of chromosome-autonomous signaling and a nucleus-wide crossover-counting mechanism partitions holocentric chromosomes relative to the crossover site, which ultimately defines the pattern of chromosome segregation during meiosis I.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-09-30T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Keeping track of time: The fundamentals of cellular clocks]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766056352662-c1944435-3425-4db2-8e2d-c7356c65c1ac/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202005136</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Gliech and Holland discuss the guiding design principles of biological clocks across a variety of model systems.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">Biological timekeeping enables the coordination and execution of complex cellular processes such as developmental programs, day/night organismal changes, intercellular signaling, and proliferative safeguards. While these systems are often considered separately owing to a wide variety of mechanisms, time frames, and outputs, all clocks are built by calibrating or delaying the rate of biochemical reactions and processes. In this review, we explore the common themes and core design principles of cellular clocks, giving special consideration to the challenges associated with building timers from biochemical components. We also outline how evolution has coopted time to increase the reliability of a diverse range of biological systems.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-09-09T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[The DNA damage response links human squamous proliferation with differentiation]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1766056343555-90151a13-de11-479d-8ee0-5ac804e38b52/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202001063</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Molinuevo et al. show a novel control of epidermoid differentiation by the DNA damage response signals and propose a model for automatic cleansing of stratified self-renewal epithelia facing genotoxic agents.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">How rapid cell multiplication leads to cell differentiation in developing tissues is still enigmatic. This question is central to morphogenesis, cell number control, and homeostasis. Self-renewal epidermoid epithelia are continuously exposed to mutagens and are the most common target of cancer. Unknown mechanisms commit rapidly proliferating cells to post-mitotic terminal differentiation. We have over-activated or inhibited the endogenous DNA damage response (DDR) pathways by combinations of activating TopBP1 protein, specific shRNAs, or chemical inhibitors for ATR, ATM, and/or DNA-PK. The results dissect and demonstrate that these signals control keratinocyte differentiation in proliferating cells independently of actual DNA damage. The DDR limits keratinocyte multiplication upon hyperproliferative stimuli. Moreover, knocking down H2AX, a common target of the DDR pathways, inhibits the epidermoid phenotype. The results altogether show that the DDR is required to maintain the balance proliferation differentiation and suggest that is part of the squamous program. We propose a homeostatic model where genetic damage is automatically and continuously cleansed by cell-autonomous mechanisms.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-10-01T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[G1/S transcription factors assemble in increasing numbers of discrete clusters through G1 phase]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765973549167-2f9a8f54-f13f-4c7c-8c54-8ffa7c71ed03/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202003041</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Super-resolution imaging shows that G1/S transcription factors in budding yeast are spatially organized in small clusters that increase in number, not molecular content, as the transcription factor copy number increases with cell growth in G1. This spatial and temporal organization of the G1/S regulon might help coordinate the Start transition.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">In budding yeast, the transcription factors SBF and MBF activate a large program of gene expression in late G1 phase that underlies commitment to cell division, termed Start. SBF/MBF are limiting with respect to target promoters in small G1 phase cells and accumulate as cells grow, raising the questions of how SBF/MBF are dynamically distributed across the G1/S regulon and how this impacts the Start transition. Super-resolution Photo-Activatable Localization Microscopy (PALM) mapping of the static positions of SBF/MBF subunits in fixed cells revealed each transcription factor was organized into discrete clusters containing approximately eight copies regardless of cell size and that the total number of clusters increased as cells grew through G1 phase. Stochastic modeling using reasonable biophysical parameters recapitulated growth-dependent SBF/MBF clustering and predicted TF dynamics that were confirmed in live cell PALM experiments. This spatio-temporal organization of SBF/MBF may help coordinate activation of G1/S regulon and the Start transition.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-08-03T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[High-content imaging-based pooled CRISPR screens in mammalian cells]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765852597723-48847f01-124d-450f-8433-a31e0385125a/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202008158</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Yan et al. demonstrate high-throughput screening of pooled CRISPR libraries for phenotypes detectable by microscopy. Their approach uses photoactivation of cells displaying the phenotype of interest and FACS sorting of marked cells, followed by sequencing, and facilitates discovery of genes involved in cell biological processes.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-based gene inactivation provides a powerful means for linking genes to particular cellular phenotypes. CRISPR-based screening typically uses large genomic pools of single guide RNAs (sgRNAs). However, this approach is limited to phenotypes that can be enriched by chemical selection or FACS sorting. Here, we developed a microscopy-based approach, which we name optical enrichment, to select cells displaying a particular CRISPR-induced phenotype by automated imaging-based computation, mark them by photoactivation of an expressed photoactivatable fluorescent protein, and then isolate the fluorescent cells using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). A plugin was developed for the open source software μManager to automate the phenotypic identification and photoactivation of cells, allowing ∼1.5 million individual cells to be screened in 8 h. We used this approach to screen 6,092 sgRNAs targeting 544 genes for their effects on nuclear size regulation and identified 14 bona fide hits. These results present a scalable approach to facilitate imaging-based pooled CRISPR screens.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-01-19T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Individual kinetochore-fibers locally dissipate force to maintain robust mammalian spindle structure]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765850287115-09ba7ec2-6de4-4494-a4ca-578b060de55e/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.201911090</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">To segregate chromosomes, the mammalian spindle must generate and respond to force. How it does so remains poorly understood. Pulling on the spindle using microneedles, Long et al. show that it can locally dissipate sustained force by regulating microtubule dynamics and breakage, thereby preserving global spindle structure.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">At cell division, the mammalian kinetochore binds many spindle microtubules that make up the kinetochore-fiber. To segregate chromosomes, the kinetochore-fiber must be dynamic and generate and respond to force. Yet, how it remodels under force remains poorly understood. Kinetochore-fibers cannot be reconstituted in vitro, and exerting controlled forces in vivo remains challenging. Here, we use microneedles to pull on mammalian kinetochore-fibers and probe how sustained force regulates their dynamics and structure. We show that force lengthens kinetochore-fibers by persistently favoring plus-end polymerization, not by increasing polymerization rate. We demonstrate that force suppresses depolymerization at both plus and minus ends, rather than sliding microtubules within the kinetochore-fiber. Finally, we observe that kinetochore-fibers break but do not detach from kinetochores or poles. Together, this work suggests an engineering principle for spindle structural homeostasis: different physical mechanisms of local force dissipation by the k-fiber limit force transmission to preserve robust spindle structure. These findings may inform how other dynamic, force-generating cellular machines achieve mechanical robustness.</p><p class="para" id="N65542"><div class="section" id="GA"><div class="img"><div class="imgeVideo"><div class="img-fullscreenIcon" onClick="javascript:showImageContent('GA');"><img src="/public/images/journalImg/fullscreen.png"/></div><div class="imageVideo"><img src="/dataresources/secured/content-1765850287115-09ba7ec2-6de4-4494-a4ca-578b060de55e/assets/JCB_201911090_GA.jpg" alt=""/></div></div></div></div></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-05-20T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[CDKD-dependent activation of CDKA;1 controls microtubule dynamics and cytokinesis during meiosis]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765842047276-690ebc0e-01b3-453c-b4b3-7c59694eda5c/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.201907016</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">CDKA;1, the <i>Arabidopsis</i> orthologue of Cdk1 and Cdk2, controls microtubule organization in meiosis. Sofroni et al. find that reducing CDKA;1 activity converts simultaneous cytokinesis—the separation of all four meiotic products concomitantly—into two successive cytokineses after the first and second meiotic divisions, as found in many crop species.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">Precise control of cytoskeleton dynamics and its tight coordination with chromosomal events are key to cell division. This is exemplified by formation of the spindle and execution of cytokinesis after nuclear division. Here, we reveal that the central cell cycle regulator CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE A;1 (CDKA;1), the <i>Arabidopsis</i> homologue of Cdk1 and Cdk2, partially in conjunction with CYCLIN B3;1 (CYCB3;1), is a key regulator of the microtubule cytoskeleton in meiosis. For full CDKA;1 activity, the function of three redundantly acting CDK-activating kinases (CAKs), CDKD;1, CDKD;2, and CDKD;3, is necessary. Progressive loss of these genes in combination with a weak loss-of-function mutant in <i>CDKA;1</i> allowed a fine-grained dissection of the requirement of cell-cycle kinase activity for meiosis. Notably, a moderate reduction of CDKA;1 activity converts the simultaneous cytokinesis in <i>Arabidopsis</i>, i.e., one cytokinesis separating all four meiotic products concurrently into two successive cytokineses with cell wall formation after the first and second meiotic division, as found in many monocotyledonous species.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-07-01T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[<i>Rashomon</i> at the kinetochore: Function(s) of the Mad1–cyclin B1 complex]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765840005754-fd9fd9a8-be83-4013-8547-db28a065e8c0/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202006006</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Houston et al. synthesize recent work analyzing Mad1–cyclin B1 complex function in mitosis.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">In the film <i>Rashomon</i>, four witnesses describe seemingly contradictory views of one event. In a recent analogy, an interaction between the master mitotic regulator cyclin B1 and the spindle checkpoint component Mad1 was independently described by three groups who propose strikingly different functions for this interaction. Here, we summarize their findings and present a perspective on reconciling the different views.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-07-02T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Induction of spontaneous human neocentromere formation and long-term maturation]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765839225366-5156d1e1-ed64-43cc-9683-394eeedd0d99/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202007210</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Murillo-Pineda et al. report a chromosome engineering system for human neocentromere formation and characterize the first experimentally generated human neocentromere. Neocentromere formation promotes local H3K9me3 eviction and cohesin and RNA polymerase II recruitment. Long-term culture results in gradual maturation of the inner centromere.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">Human centromeres form primarily on α-satellite DNA but sporadically arise de novo at naive ectopic loci, creating neocentromeres. Centromere inheritance is driven primarily by chromatin containing the histone H3 variant CENP-A. Here, we report a chromosome engineering system for neocentromere formation in human cells and characterize the first experimentally induced human neocentromere at a naive locus. The spontaneously formed neocentromere spans a gene-poor 100-kb domain enriched in histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylated (H3K9me3). Long-read sequencing revealed this neocentromere was formed by purely epigenetic means and assembly of a functional kinetochore correlated with CENP-A seeding, eviction of H3K9me3 and local accumulation of mitotic cohesin and RNA polymerase II. At formation, the young neocentromere showed markedly reduced chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) occupancy and poor sister chromatin cohesion. However, long-term tracking revealed increased CPC assembly and low-level transcription providing evidence for centromere maturation over time.</p><p class="para" id="N65542"><div class="section" id="GA"><div class="img"><div class="imgeVideo"><div class="img-fullscreenIcon" onClick="javascript:showImageContent('GA');"><img src="/public/images/journalImg/fullscreen.png"/></div><div class="imageVideo"><img src="/dataresources/secured/content-1765839225366-5156d1e1-ed64-43cc-9683-394eeedd0d99/assets/JCB_202007210_GA.jpg" alt=""/></div></div></div></div></p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2021-01-14T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Fission yeast Pak1 phosphorylates anillin-like Mid1 for spatial control of cytokinesis]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765819596821-17393f6b-22e0-48ee-b2a0-f74a3ae469a5/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.201908017</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Magliozzi et al. show that fission yeast cell polarity kinase Pak1 regulates cytokinesis. Through a phosphoproteomic screen and subsequent mutant analysis, their work uncovers direct targets and mechanisms for Pak1 activity during cell division.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">Protein kinases direct polarized growth by regulating the cytoskeleton in time and space and could play similar roles in cell division. We found that the Cdc42-activated polarity kinase Pak1 colocalizes with the assembling contractile actomyosin ring (CAR) and remains at the division site during septation. Mutations in <i>pak1</i> led to defects in CAR assembly and genetic interactions with cytokinesis mutants. Through a phosphoproteomic screen, we identified novel Pak1 substrates that function in polarized growth and cytokinesis. For cytokinesis, we found that Pak1 regulates the localization of its substrates Mid1 and Cdc15 to the CAR. Mechanistically, Pak1 phosphorylates the Mid1 N-terminus to promote its association with cortical nodes that act as CAR precursors. Defects in Pak1-Mid1 signaling lead to misplaced and defective division planes, but these phenotypes can be rescued by synthetic tethering of Mid1 to cortical nodes. Our work defines a new signaling mechanism driven by a cell polarity kinase that promotes CAR assembly in the correct time and place.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-05-18T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[SCF-Fbxo42 promotes synaptonemal complex assembly by downregulating PP2A-B56]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765760073243-75fd329b-91a4-46d8-9d29-bd26176afcdd/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.202009167</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">The synaptonemal complex promotes faithful exchanges between homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Barbosa et al show that SCF-FBxo42 is important for assembly and maintenance of the synaptonemal complex by restricting the phosphatase PP2A-B56 level.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">Meiosis creates genetic diversity by recombination and segregation of chromosomes. The synaptonemal complex assembles during meiotic prophase I and assists faithful exchanges between homologous chromosomes, but how its assembly/disassembly is regulated remains to be understood. Here, we report how two major posttranslational modifications, phosphorylation and ubiquitination, cooperate to promote synaptonemal complex assembly. We found that the ubiquitin ligase complex SCF is important for assembly and maintenance of the synaptonemal complex in <i>Drosophila</i> female meiosis. This function of SCF is mediated by two substrate-recognizing F-box proteins, Slmb/βTrcp and Fbxo42. SCF-Fbxo42 down-regulates the phosphatase subunit PP2A-B56, which is important for synaptonemal complex assembly and maintenance.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-12-31T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item><item>
            <title><![CDATA[Phosphoregulation provides specificity to biomolecular condensates in the cell cycle and cell polarity]]></title>
            <media:thumbnail url="https://storage.googleapis.com/nova-demo-unsecured-files/unsecured/content-1765610117928-5a4e4a00-0882-4a64-abbb-bdb6cb30262f/cover.png"></media:thumbnail>
            <link>https://www.novareader.co/book/isbn/10.1083/jcb.201910021</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p class="para" id="N65540">Cells must control the composition and location of biomolecular condensates. This study shows that phosphorylation of the RNA-binding protein Whi3 is used to regulate functionally distinct condensates important for cell polarity and nuclear division in multinucleate fungus <i>Ashbya gossypii</i>.</p><p class="para" id="N65539">Biomolecular condensation is a way of organizing cytosol in which proteins and nucleic acids coassemble into compartments. In the multinucleate filamentous fungus <i>Ashbya gossypii</i>, the RNA-binding protein Whi3 regulates the cell cycle and cell polarity through forming macromolecular structures that behave like condensates. Whi3 has distinct spatial localizations and mRNA targets, making it a powerful model for how, when, and where specific identities are established for condensates. We identified residues on Whi3 that are differentially phosphorylated under specific conditions and generated mutants that ablate this regulation. This yielded separation of function alleles that were functional for either cell polarity or nuclear cycling but not both. This study shows that phosphorylation of individual residues on molecules in biomolecular condensates can provide specificity that gives rise to distinct functional identities in the same cell.</p>]]></description>
            <pubDate><![CDATA[2020-05-12T00:00]]></pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>