PLoS ONE
Home Semi-dominant effects of a novel ripening inhibitor (rin) locus allele on tomato fruit ripening
Semi-dominant effects of a novel <i>ripening inhibitor</i> (<i>rin</i>) locus allele on tomato fruit ripening
Semi-dominant effects of a novel ripening inhibitor (rin) locus allele on tomato fruit ripening

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Article Type: Research Article Article History
Abstract

The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) ripening inhibitor (rin) mutation completely represses fruit ripening, as rin fruits fail to express ripening-associated genes and remain green and firm. Moreover, heterozygous rin fruits (rin/+) ripen normally but have extended shelf life, an important consideration for this perishable fruit crop; therefore, heterozygous rin has been widely used to breed varieties that produce red tomatoes with improved shelf life. We previously used CRISPR/Cas9 to produce novel alleles at the rin locus. The wild-type allele RIN encodes a MADS-box transcription factor and the novel allele, named as rinG2, generates an early stop codon, resulting in C-terminal truncation of the transcription factor. Like rin fruits, rinG2 fruits exhibit extended shelf life, but unlike rin fruits, which remain yellow-green even after long-term storage, rinG2 fruits turn orange due to ripening-associated carotenoid production. Here, to explore the potential of the rinG2 mutation for breeding, we characterized the effects of rinG2 in the heterozygous state (rinG2/+) compared to the effects of rin/+. The softening of rinG2/+ fruits was delayed compared to the wild type but to a lesser degree than rin/+ fruits. Lycopene and β-carotene levels in rinG2/+ fruits were similar to those of the wild type, whereas rin/+ fruits accumulated half the amount of β-carotene compared to the wild type. The rinG2/+ fruits produced lower levels of ethylene than wild-type and rin/+ fruits. Expression analysis revealed that in rinG2/+ fruits, the rinG2 mutation (like rin) partially inhibited the expression of ripening-associated genes. The small differences in the inhibitory effects of rinG2 vs. rin coincided with small differences in phenotypes, such as ethylene production, softening, and carotenoid accumulation. Therefore, rinG2 represents a promising genetic resource for developing tomato cultivars with extended shelf life.

Ito,Nakamura,Kotake-Nara,and Fujii: Semi-dominant effects of a novel ripening inhibitor (rin) locus allele on tomato fruit ripening

Introduction

Extending the shelf life of agricultural products is important for supplying fresh, nutritious foods and reducing food losses. Storing fruits and vegetables at low temperature and maintaining an appropriate atmosphere during transport and storage can preserve the quality of fresh vegetables and fruits. Developing cultivars that produce fruits with resistance to over-ripening is another effective way to maintain fruit quality [1]. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), a major vegetable consumed all over the world, is a typical fruit species that is often wasted due to over-ripening-associated quality losses, such as cracking, wilting, and infection [2, 3]. Therefore, extending shelf life has been an important objective for tomato breeding programs [46].

Various mutations affecting fruit physiology in tomato have been discovered, and a variety of ripening mutants have been investigated as genetic resources to develop cultivars that produce fruits with extended shelf life [7, 8]. The major ripening mutants ripening inhibitor (rin), non-ripening (nor), and Colorless non-ripening (Cnr), which exhibit completely inhibited ripening, have been extensively studied. These loci encode transcription factors of the MADS-box family, NAC family, and SBP-box family, respectively [911]. The rin and nor mutants exhibit semi-dominant phenotypes in terms of ripening physiology: the fruits of the F1 hybrids between each mutant and wild type turn red at the ripening stage but show delayed softening (Fig 1A) [6, 12, 13]. The alcobaca (alc) mutant, an allele of nor, also exhibits a semi-dominant phenotype [5].

Expression of the rinG2 allele in tomato.
Fig 1

Expression of the rinG2 allele in tomato.

A. Ripe fruits with homozygous or heterozygous mutant alleles in the rin locus. Fruits with the indicated genotypes were harvested at 7 days after the breaker stage. B. The rinG2 mutation generates an early stop codon. “A” in red represents the base inserted by genome editing. C. Schematic diagrams of the proteins encoded by the rin and rinG2 alleles. The rin allele produces a protein encoded by a fusion mRNA composed of RIN lacking the last exon and MC lacking the first exon [9]. The rinG2 mutation generates an early stop codon, which removes the C-terminus including the transcriptional activator domain of RIN [23]. D. Accumulation of mutant proteins in heterozygous fruits. In rin- and rinG2-heterozygous fruits, the mutant proteins (indicated as rin and rinG2, respectively) accumulated simultaneously with wild-type protein (RIN). Proteins from nuclei of fruits harvested at 4 days after the breaker stage were separated and subjected to an immunoblotting assay with RIN-antibodies [15]. We did not measure the detection efficiencies of the allelic proteins in extracts from heterozygous lines, and therefore, we cannot conclusively state whether the differences in signal intensities between the allelic proteins reflect differences in their abundances in the cells.

The rin mutant has been extensively used for studying the regulation of the ripening process. The RIN locus encodes a SEPALLATA type MADS-box transcription factor with transcription-activating activity [9, 14]. RIN is specifically expressed at the onset of ripening and during ripening; RIN forms MADS-box transcription factor complexes that bind to the promoter regions of thousands of ripening-associated genes [1521]. Recent studies using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of RIN have clarified the precise role of RIN as a ripening regulator [2225]. In contrast to the non-ripening phenotype of the rin mutant, RIN knockout mutant fruits undergo initial ripening, accumulating small amounts of lycopene and increasing ethylene production at a low but detectable level, suggesting that RIN is required for full ripening but not for the initiation of ripening [22, 24]. Surprisingly, RIN-knockout mutant fruits softened excessively, even compared to wild-type fruits, suggest that RIN does not simply accelerate ripening-associated changes but also represses excess softening [23].

Another allelic mutant in the RIN locus, rinG2, was also developed by CRISPR/Cas9 and exhibited another specific ripening phenotype. Similar to rin, the rinG2 mutation confers delayed softening compared to the wild type, but unlike rin fruits, rinG2 fruits show ripening-specific changes in coloration, turning orange due to the accumulation of carotenoids (Fig 1A) [23]. The phenotype of rinG2 offers great promise for use in breeding tomato cultivars with extended shelf life; however, the low lycopene accumulation in these fruits must be improved.

In the current study, to examine the possible use of the rinG2 mutation as a practical method for breeding tomatoes with extended shelf life, we investigated the heterozygous effects of rinG2 by developing F1 hybrid plants with the rinG2/+ genotype. Similar to the classic rin mutation, rinG2 had semi-dominant effects on ripening physiology. We compared the phenotypes of rinG2/+ vs. rin/+ and explored the possible molecular activities of allelic mutant proteins in the cells of heterozygous fruits.

Materials and methods

Plants with mutations in the rin locus

The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivar Ailsa Craig (AC), which was used as the parental line to produce the genome-edited mutants, was used as the wild-type control. The rinG2 mutation was generated previously with the CRISPR/Cas9 system [26]. The T1 generation line G2#13–15, a rinG2 homozygous mutant, was crossed with AC to produce an F1 hybrid plant with the rinG2/RIN genotype (rinG2/+). LA3754 is a rin mutant line with a near-isogenic AC background. Plants were grown in a growth room under a 16-h-light (fluorescent lamps)/8-h-dark cycle at 25°C.

Immunoblotting analysis

Nuclear extracts from ripening fruits were prepared for SDS-PAGE as previously described [14]. Nuclear extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred to Immobilon-P PVDF membrane (Merck). The preparation of polyclonal anti-RIN antibodies was described previously [15]. Immunodetection reactions were performed on membranes with antiserum against RIN as primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked anti-rabbit IgG (GE Healthcare) as secondary antibody. Fluorescence signals generated with the Chemi-Lumi One L (Nacalai Tesque) were detected by exposure to X-ray film.

Characterization of fruit phenotypes

The fruits were stored at 25°C and their firmness was measured with a Tensipresser IIX texture analyzer (Taketomo Electric). Firmness was determined based on the force required to reduce fruit diameter by 5% with a 10-mm diameter plunger.

Carotenoid contents were measured in fruits harvested at 10 days after the day of ripening initiation. Carotenoid extraction was performed as described previously [27]. Briefly, 0.5 g of flesh from the equatorial region of a fruit was sampled and stored at –80°C. The frozen tissue was homogenized in 2.5 mL chloroform and 1 mL methanol using an Ultra-Turrax T25 homogenizer (IKA). The homogenate was mixed with 1 mL Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and stored on ice for 20 min. After centrifugation at 3,000 ×g for 5 min in a himac centrifuge CR21G (Hitachi), the organic lower phase containing carotenoids was retrieved. The residual carotenoid was re-extracted from the aqueous phase with 2.5 mL chloroform. After centrifugation at 3,000 ×g for 5 min, the lower organic phase was retrieved and mixed with the previously generated carotenoid preparation. Carotenoids were quantified by HPLC using an LC-20AT pump, an SPD-M10A photodiode array detector, and a CTO-10AS column (Shimadzu) on an ODS-80Ts column (2.0 × 250 mm, Tosoh) with an ODS-S1 precolumn (2.0 × 10 mm, Tosoh). Isocratic analysis was performed at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min with methanol/ethyl acetate (70:30, v/v) containing 0.1% ammonium acetate. Lycopene was quantified from the peak area at 470 nm, and β-carotene was quantified from the peak area at 450 nm.

To measure ethylene production, a fruit was enclosed in a 1-L chamber for 2 h (for wild type and the heterozygous mutant lines) or 5 h (for the rin and rinG2 mutant lines). A 1-mL sample of headspace gas was withdrawn from the chamber. The gas was injected into a GC8A gas chromatograph (Shimadzu), and the ethylene peak was determined with a C-R8A Chromatopac (Shimadzu).

Reverse-transcription quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR)

Flesh in the equatorial region of a fruit was sampled and stored at –80°C. The tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen, and total RNA was extracted from the ground tissue using an RNeasy Plus Kit (Qiagen). The RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (Toyobo). Quantitative PCR amplification was conducted using Thunderbird SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo) with a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). Relative quantification of the transcript level of each gene was performed using the 2-ΔΔCT method [28]. The clathrin adaptor complex medium subunit gene (CAC) was used as a reference [29]. Primer sequences are listed in S1 Table.

Results

The rinG2 mutation produces an early stop codon resulting in the accumulation of truncated RIN protein in heterozygous fruit

The classic rin mutant allele encodes a fusion of RIN with Macrocalyx (MC), which is encoded at the genomic region adjacent to RIN [9, 30] (Fig 1C). The rinG2 allele was developed by genome editing of the RIN gene [23, 26]. Genome editing resulted in a one-base insertion at position 596 from the translation start position in the mRNA, which caused a frame-shift producing an early stop codon just after the insertion (Fig 1B). This mutation modified the wild-type RIN (242 amino acid residues) into a peptide with 199 amino acid residues composed of 198 amino acids from the original RIN protein and an additional amino acid produced by the frame shift (Fig 1C). The truncation removed the transcriptional-activating domain from the wild-type RIN transcription factor, but the truncated rinG2 protein retained the ability to bind to RIN target sites by forming a MADS-box transcription factor complex [23].

Fruits of heterozygous plants produced by a cross between the rinG2 mutant and wild type (rinG2/+) turned red, like those of wild type and heterozygous plants produced by crossing the rin mutant and wild type (rin/+, Fig 1A). Immunoblotting analysis with RIN-specific antiserum detected the wild-type RIN protein as well as the RIN–MC fusion protein encoded by the rin mutant allele and the truncated protein encoded by the rinG2 allele (Fig 1D). In fruits of heterozygous plants with the genotypes rin/+ and rinG2/+, the mutant proteins encoded by the rin and rinG2 alleles were detected simultaneously with wild-type protein, suggesting that the mutant proteins play specific roles in the cells of heterozygous fruit. Previous studies demonstrated that rin protein has transcriptional repressor activity, whereas wild-type RIN protein has transcriptional activator activity, and rinG2 protein has neither activator nor repressor activity, although the rinG2 protein still binds to target genome regions and forms a MADS-box transcription factor complex, as does wild-type RIN protein [22, 23].

Shelf life of rinG2/+ fruits

We evaluated the phenotypes of the fruits during long-term storage. To normalize the fruit stages among lines, we defined the day when a fruit showed the first signs of red pigmentation as the initiation of fruit ripening, which is termed the breaker stage. The transition into the breaker stage (red pigmentation) was clearly recognized in the fruits of the rin/+ and rinG2/+ plants, as well as wild-type fruits. The rinG2/rinG2 fruits also showed some red pigmentation, although the coloring was relatively faint. The rin/rin fruits never accumulated red pigments but did transition into the mature green stage, i.e., the stage just before the breaker stage: wild-type fruits showed reduced green pigmentation and a faint yellowish color during this stage [18, 23]. For rin/rin fruits, the stage at 3 days after the mature green stage was defined as the breaker-equivalent stage.

We harvested fruits from all lines at 7 days after the breaker stage and stored them at 25°C (Fig 2). During storage conditions, the surfaces of wild-type fruits became wrinkled beginning at 2 weeks after the breaker stage. These fruits gradually dried up and became smaller. By contrast, the rin/rin and rinG2/rinG2 fruits maintained their appearance over a 10-week period, as did the rin/+ fruits. The surfaces of rinG2/+ fruits began to wrinkle after 6 weeks, but this process was delayed and was less severe than that observed in the wild-type fruits (Figs 2 and S1).

Heterozygous effects of rinG2 on fruit shelf life.
Fig 2

Heterozygous effects of rinG2 on fruit shelf life.

Fruits were harvested at 7 days after the breaker stage (0 W) and stored at 25°C.

We measured fruit firmness by pressing the surfaces of fruits that had been harvested at the breaker stage and stored at 25°C (Fig 3A). Wild-type fruits showed the greatest reduction in firmness after 4 weeks of storage. The fruit firmness decreased rapidly during the first week and continued to gradually decrease thereafter. Under these conditions, rin/rin fruits were the hardest among the lines examined, followed by rinG2/rinG2 fruits. The rin/+ and rinG2/+ fruits showed similar reductions in fruit firmness to the wild type after the first week of storage, but further reductions were delayed. The fruit-softening rate of rinG2/+ fruits was similar to that of rin/+ fruits for the first two weeks of storage; subsequently, rinG2/+ fruits became slightly softer than rin/+ fruits but were still harder than wild-type fruits.

Fruit softening, carotenoid accumulation, and ethylene biosynthesis in rinG2/+.
Fig 3

Fruit softening, carotenoid accumulation, and ethylene biosynthesis in rinG2/+.

A. Firmness of fruits with mutations in the rin locus. Fruits harvested just before the breaker stage were examined as 0 week samples. Breaker stage fruits were harvested and examined at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after harvest. Data represent the means ± SE of five biological replicates. B. Lycopene and β-carotene contents of fruits with mutations in the rin locus. Fruits were harvested at 10 days after the breaker stage. Data represent the means ± SE of five or six biological replicates. C. Ethylene biosynthesis in fruits with mutations in the rin locus. Fruits just before the breaker stage were harvested and examined daily. Data represent the means ± SE of at least four biological replicates.

To investigate ripening-specific gene expression, we prepared mRNA from fruits harvested at the pre-ripening stage (G) and at 4- and 7-days after the breaker stage (B+4 and B+7). Because the transcription of the rin mutant allele in the rin homozygous mutant is induced at a time equivalent to ripening initiation in wild-type fruits even though ripening-associated ethylene levels do not increase [23], the transcriptional induction of any alleles in the rin locus occurs as an initial reaction to ripening prior to the increase in ethylene levels. Therefore, the expression of these alleles can be regarded as a marker of the transition into the initial ripening stage. In each line, the expression of alleles in the rin locus was not detected at the G-stage but was intense during ripening (B+4 and B+7 stages), indicating that the fruits of each line, including the rin mutant, were harvested at equivalent stages (Fig 4).

The expression of ripening-associated genes in rinG2/+ fruit.
Fig 4

The expression of ripening-associated genes in rinG2/+ fruit.

mRNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR. mRNA was prepared from fruits at the green-coloring stage just before the initiation of ripening (G) and fruits during ripening (4 and 7days after the breaker stage; B+4 and B+7). A primer set for the RIN alleles anneals to a common sequence of the wild type, rin, and rinG2 alleles. Data represent the means ± SE of three biological replicates.

FRUITFULL1 (FUL1) encodes a MADS-box transcription factor that forms a complex with RIN and regulates ripening [17, 18, 3133]. The ripening-associated upregulation of FUL1 was not detected in the rin mutant, but it was detected in the rinG2 mutant and the two heterozygous lines, pointing to the activity of the rin mutant protein as a transcriptional repressor (Fig 4). We then focused on three genes related to cell wall metabolism during ripening to look for relationships between their expression and aspects of fruit softening in the heterozygous lines (Fig 4). Polygalacturonase2a (PG2a) encodes an enzyme that hydrolyzes α-1,4 glycosidic bonds within pectins and is strongly induced during ripening [4, 34]. PG2a expression was correlated to the rate of fruit softening in all lines examined. Wild-type fruits showed intense PG2a expression during ripening, whereas its expression was strongly repressed in the rin/rin and rinG2/rinG2 fruits. Both the rin/+ and rinG2/+ lines showed ripening-specific upregulation of PG2a, but the PG2a transcript level in these lines was approximately 39% and 34% of the wild type at the B+4 stage, and 34% and 25% of wild type at the B+7 stage, respectively.

Pectate lyase (PL), which depolymerizes pectin via a β-elimination mechanism, is a major contributor to tomato fruit softening [35, 36]. PL expression was observed specifically during ripening in wild-type fruits but was strongly repressed in rin/rin fruits. Unlike PG2a, PL was expressed at only a slightly lower level in rinG2/rinG2 fruits and at a comparable level in both heterozygous lines vs. the wild type. Cellulase 2 (Cel2), encoding an endo-β-1,4-glucanese, was specifically expressed during ripening in wild-type fruits. This gene was expressed at significantly lower levels in the homozygous and heterozygous rin and rinG2 fruits compared to the wild type at the B+4 stage; among these, the rinG2/+ fruits showed slightly higher expression at the B+7 stage compared to the other fruits.

Carotenoid accumulation in rinG2/+ fruits

We extracted carotenoids from fully ripened fruits that had been harvested at 10 days after the breaker stage and measured the accumulation of the pigments lycopene (red) and β-carotene (orange) (Fig 3B). The abundant accumulation of lycopene in wild-type fruits was completely inhibited by the rin mutation, whereas low but measurable levels of lycopene were detected in rinG2/rinG2 fruits. The reduced accumulation of lycopene in the mutants was restored by crossing with wild-type plants, as rin/+ fruits as well as rinG2/+ fruits accumulated lycopene at levels comparable to those in wild-type fruits; lycopene levels were slightly higher in rinG2/+ fruits vs. rin/+ fruits. The β-carotene levels were also reduced by the rin mutation, but unlike lycopene, β-carotene levels in rinG2/rinG2 fruits were similar to those of wild-type fruits. We also detected a difference in the two heterozygotes: rin/+ fruits accumulated β-carotene at 52% of wild-type levels, whereas β-carotene levels in rinG2/+ fruits were similar to those of the wild type.

Lycopene accumulation during ripening depends on the increased expression of enzymes that catalyze reactions upstream of lycopene biosynthesis in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway. Lycopene levels are also affected by lycopene β-cyclases, which catalyze the conversion of lycopene into β-carotene, thus reducing lycopene accumulation. Phytoene synthase 1 (Psy1) encodes an enzyme involved in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway upstream of lycopene biosynthesis and Psy1 levels are regarded as rate limiting for lycopene production during ripening [37]. Psy1 was upregulated specifically during ripening in wild-type fruits but was strongly repressed in rin/rin fruits (Fig 4). By contrast, Psy1 was upregulated in rinG2/rinG2 fruits compared with rin/rin fruits, supporting the differences in carotenoid accumulation between the rin/rin and rinG2/rinG2 mutants. Psy1 was expressed at substantial but lower levels in the two heterozygous mutants vs. the wild type and at slightly higher levels in rinG2/+ fruits than in rin/+ fruits, which was in accordance with the carotenoid levels in each line.

Of the several genes encoding lycopene β-cyclase, Lycopene beta-cyclase 1 (LcyB or CrtL1) is indispensable for chloroplast activity during the vegetative growth phase but its expression is considerably reduced during ripening in wild-type fruits (Fig 4) [23]. Low levels of lycopene and high levels of β-carotene accumulate in rinG2/rinG2 fruits due to high levels of CrtL1 expression and reduced Psy1 expression during ripening [23]. CrtL1 was expressed at a lower level in rin/+ fruits than in wild-type or rinG2/+ fruits during ripening (Fig 4), which is consistent with the β-carotene levels in these lines.

Ethylene biosynthesis in rinG2/+ fruits

We harvested mature green fruits from each line and monitored ethylene production from the fruits daily (Fig 3C). Wild-type fruits showed an initial increase in ethylene production when the fruit exhibited the first sign of red pigmentation or just before coloring; this ethylene production increased rapidly and reached a peak after 5 days. By contrast, we detected little or no increase in ethylene production in rin fruits throughout the assay. Ethylene production in fruits with the rinG2 mutation began at the time of fruit pigmentation. The mutant fruits produced very low but significant levels of ethylene, and the fruits turned orange. Ethylene production in rin/+ fruits rapidly increased, as observed in the wild type, but peak levels were ~72% that of the wild type. The rinG2/+ fruits also showed a clear increase in ethylene production associated with red fruit coloring. However, a milder increase in production was detected compared to rin/+ fruits, and the peak level was ~44% that of wild-type fruits.

1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACS) is a rate-limiting enzyme for ethylene production. Among the homologous genes encoding ACS, ACS2 and ACS4 are up-regulated at the onset of ripening and are thus responsible for the ethylene burst during ripening (Fig 4) [38, 39]. ACS2 was expressed at substantial levels in the fruits of both heterozygous lines and even in rinG2/rinG2 fruits, suggesting that ACS2 expression is not sufficient for ethylene production. ACS4 expression appeared to be more closely related to ethylene production in the lines.

Discussion

The heterozygous effects of ripening mutations have been used to extend the shelf life of tomato fruit [6, 13]. Of the major ripening mutations, rin and nor show effects as heterozygotes, indicating that they partially inhibit the ripening process by substantially reducing ethylene production and softening rates while only slightly reducing lycopene accumulation [13]. Another ripening mutation is the dominant allele Cnr [40]; heterozygous Cnr inhibits ripening in a more severe manner than rin or nor, strongly reducing lycopene and β-carotene accumulation, as well as ethylene production [13]. Similar to rin and nor, the rinG2 mutation had a semi-dominant effect on ripening, although rinG2/+ fruits exhibited milder phenotypes than the classic ripening mutants. In rinG2/+ fruits, fruit softening was delayed, but to a slightly lesser extent than in rin/+ fruits, while carotenoids, especially β-carotene, accumulated to higher levels compared to rin/+ fruits. These results suggest that F1 breeding using the rinG2 mutation could be a useful option for improving shelf life when focusing on carotenoid content.

The targeting of genes involved in cell wall modification has been extensively investigated as a method to delay fruit softening in tomato [4, 41]. Silencing of genes encoding pectin methylesterase (PME), β-galactosidase (β-Gal), and expansin did not have a major impact on softening [4245]. By contrast, silencing of PL, encoding an enzyme with pectin depolymerizing activity, substantially reduced fruit softening [35, 36], highlighting the important effect of pectin depolymerization on fruit softening. Another pectin depolymerizing enzyme, PG, is not a major contributor to tomato softening based on the results of gene silencing [34, 46, 47] and forced PG expression in rin fruits [48], suggesting that PG alone does not have sufficient activity for fruit softening. In the current study, however, PG2a expression was higher the fruits with the highest softening rates, including fruits of wild type, the rin and rinG2 mutants, and the two heterozygous mutant lines, whereas PL expression in the rinG2 mutant and the heterozygous lines was not likely correlated with fruit softening. These results suggest that PG activity may be rate limiting for softening only in genetic backgrounds including rin or rinG2, indicating that additional factors might be involved in PG activity-dependent softening. Genes showing inhibited expression in the rin or rinG2 background, similar to the expression pattern of Cel2 (Fig 4), might represent additional factors that promote softening in conjunction with PG activity. Studies of the ‘Delayed Fruit Deterioration’ tomato cultivar, which shows prolonged fruit firmness, suggested that (in addition to cell wall disassembly) water permeability through the fruit cuticle layer likely affects fruit softening [1, 8]. Analyses of the effects of rin and rinG2 on permeability may find other key mechanisms for the reduced softening rate in the heterozygous mutants.

The rin and rinG2 alleles produced different effects on ripening-associated ethylene production (Fig 3C). The activity of ACS isozymes is rate limiting for ethylene production, but ethylene production was not always correlated with ACS2 and ACS4 transcript levels in the rinG2-homozygous/heterozygous lines (Figs 3C and 4). The enzyme activity of ACS2 is regulated by a posttranslational modification, whereas ACS4 activity is not [49, 50]. In addition to ACS4 activity, ethylene biosynthesis in the two heterozygous lines might be regulated by the ACS2-activating system, which is unlikely to function in rinG2/rinG2 fruits. The rinG2/+ fruits produced lower levels of ethylene than rin/+ fruits, although ripening physiology, including carotenoid accumulation and fruit softening, appeared to be more pronounced in rinG2/+ fruits. The amount of ethylene required for ripening-associated gene expression might be significantly lower than that produced in wild-type fruits, as suggested by analysis of PG expression in ACS-antisense transgenic tomato plants [51, 52]. Ethylene production in rinG2/+ fruits might be above the threshold required for ripening induction, but other factors, such as the transcription factor activities of the proteins encoded by the RIN alleles, might have stronger effects on ripening, leading to the differences between the two heterozygous lines.

Instead of F1 breeding, as performed in the current study, we previously tried to improve lycopene accumulation in rinG2 homozygous fruits by knockout the CrtL1 gene, which encodes an enzyme involved in metabolizing lycopene into β-carotene. The CrtL1 experiment, however, produced albino plants because CrtL1 is required for photosynthesis in green tissues, and thus the trial failed [22]. However, the old gold (og) and old gold crimson (ogc) mutations were successfully used to increase lycopene accumulation in tomato. These mutants harbor a functional defect in the gene encoding a lycopene β-cyclase in the Beta (B) locus, which is a homolog of CrtL1 [53]. Unlike the CrtL1 knockout, the og and ogc mutations have no effect on vegetative growth. The use of the og or ogc mutation might be effective for improving lycopene accumulation in rinG2 tomatoes.

In the current study, rinG2 heterozygous fruits showed intermediate phenotypes between wild type and the rinG2 mutant, indicating that rinG2 has a semi-dominant effect on the wild-type allele. The effects of rinG2 on counteracting the wild-type allele appear to be milder than the effect of the rin mutation. We previously determined that the phenotypes of F1 hybrid fruits between wild type and a RIN-knockout mutant were similar to the wild type in terms of fruit softening, carotenoid accumulation, and ethylene production, indicating that the knockout allele is recessive and, more importantly, that the dose of the wild-type allele in heterozygous fruits has little effect on ripening [22]. This finding suggests that the partial inhibition of ripening found in rin- and rinG2-heterozygous fruits was likely not due to the dosage effect of the wild-type allele but was instead due to the effects of the gene products of the mutant alleles, which accumulated in heterozygous fruits (Fig 1D) and have some transcription factor activity [22, 23]. The rin allele encodes a fusion protein between RIN and MC containing the DNA binding domain from RIN and the transcriptional repressor domain from MC but lacking the transcriptional-activating domain of RIN [9, 22]. The repressor activity of the rin protein is strong enough to inhibit the expression of most ripening-associated genes in the homozygous mutant (Fig 4) [15]. By contrast, the protein encoded by the rinG2 allele has neither transcriptional activation nor repression activity, but it still binds to target genome regions by forming complexes with ripening regulating MADS-box proteins [TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE1 (TAGL1) and FUL homologs] in a similar manner to the wild-type RIN protein [23]. In rinG2 homozygous fruits, the mutant allele had inconsistent effects on the transcription of ripening genes: some genes (such as PG2a and Cel2) were repressed in this mutant, but some genes (such as FUL1, ACS2, and PL) were expressed at substantial levels (Fig 4). The different effects of the two mutant alleles, however, appeared to become inconspicuous when these mutations were heterozygous with the wild-type allele, as these fruits showed partial softening and red pigmentation due to the partial reduction of ripening gene expression. Because the rinG2 mutant protein forms complexes with other MADS-box proteins in a similar manner to wild-type RIN, in heterozygous condition, the rinG2 protein and the wild-type protein might compete for partner MADS-box proteins, suggesting that a certain amount of wild-type RIN may fail to be incorporated into transcription factor complexes. By contrast, rin mutant protein forms a homodimer but likely does not form complexes with the partners of RIN for DNA binding [22, 23]. Therefore, in rin heterozygous fruits, wild-type RIN forms complexes with its MADS-box partners without competition from the rin protein (unlike the situation in rinG2 heterozygous cells), suggesting that more wild-type RIN may be incorporated into the transcription factor complex in an active form in rin/+ fruits compared with rinG2/+ fruits. In addition to competing for complex formation, the rin and rinG2 proteins may also compete with RIN for DNA binding sites in heterozygous fruits. The rin protein homodimer competes with wild-type RIN for binding to the cis-regulatory regions of the target ripening genes. The transcription of these genes is intensely inhibited by the binding of the rin protein. By contrast, in rinG2 heterozygous fruits, the rinG2 protein might only counteract the transcriptional activity of the wild-type RIN protein to a minor extent, although the proteins compete for binding to target genome regions. Taken together, our findings suggest that despite the similar phenotypes of rin- and rinG2-heterozygous fruits, the rin and rinG2 mutant proteins might have different competitive effects on wild-type RIN during the formation of MADS-box protein complexes and the binding to target genome regions. Additional studies to obtain a more complete understanding of the molecular functions of these proteins will expand the potential for improving tomato fruit physiology and facilitate tomato breeding.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Yasuyo Sekiyama for help with fruit softening measurements and Ms. Yayoi Sasaki for technical assistance.

References

SOsorio, RTCarneiro, ALytovchenko, RMcQuinn, ISorensen, JGVallarino, et al. Genetic and metabolic effects of ripening mutations and vine detachment on tomato fruit quality. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(1):10618. 10.1111/pbi.13176

VSMeli, SGhosh, TNPrabha, NChakraborty, SChakraborty, ADatta. Enhancement of fruit shelf life by suppressing N-glycan processing enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(6):24138. 10.1073/pnas.0909329107

TJMcKenzie, LSingh-Peterson, SJRUnderhill. Quantifying Postharvest Loss and the Implication of Market-Based Decisions: A Case Study of Two Commercial Domestic Tomato Supply Chains in Queensland, Australia. Horticulturae. 2017;3(3). doi: ARTN 44. 10.3390/horticulturae3030044 PMID: WOS:000458694100004

GTucker, XYin, AZhang, MWang, QZhu, XLiu, et al. Ethylene and fruit softening. Food Quality and Safety. 2017;1(4):25367. 10.1093/fqsafe/fyx024

MVFaria, WRMaluf, SMde Azevedo, VCAndrade-Junior, LAGomes, PMoretto, et al. Yield and post-harvest quality of tomato hybrids heterozygous at the loci alcobaca, old gold-crimson or high pigment. Genet Mol Res. 2003;2(3):31727.

MKitagawa, HIto, TShiina, NNakamura, TInakuma, TKasumi, et al. Characterization of tomato fruit ripening and analysis of gene expression in F1 hybrids of the ripening inhibitor (rin) mutant. Physiol Plant. 2005;123:3318.

JJGiovannoni. Fruit ripening mutants yield insights into ripening control. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007;10(3):2839. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.008

MSaladie, AJMatas, TIsaacson, MAJenks, SMGoodwin, KJNiklas, et al. A reevaluation of the key factors that influence tomato fruit softening and integrity. Plant Physiol. 2007;144(2):101228. 10.1104/pp.107.097477

JVrebalov, DRuezinsky, VPadmanabhan, RWhite, DMedrano, RDrake, et al. A MADS-box gene necessary for fruit ripening at the tomato ripening-inhibitor (rin) locus. Science. 2002;296(5566):3436. 10.1126/science.1068181

10 

JJGiovannoni. Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell. 2004;16 Suppl:S17080. 10.1105/tpc.019158

11 

KManning, MTör, MPoole, YHong, AJThompson, GJKing, et al. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat Genet. 2006;38(8):94852. 10.1038/ng1841

12 

RWBuescher, WASistrunk. Softening, pectolytic activity, and storage-life of rin and nor tomato hybrids. HortScience. 1976;11(6):6034.

13 

RWang, MLammers, YTikunov, AGBovy, GCAngenent, RAde Maagd. The rin, nor and Cnr spontaneous mutations inhibit tomato fruit ripening in additive and epistatic manners. Plant Sci. 2020;294:110436. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110436

14 

YIto, MKitagawa, NIhashi, KYabe, JKimbara, JYasuda, et al. DNA-binding specificity, transcriptional activation potential, and the rin mutation effect for the tomato fruit-ripening regulator RIN. Plant J. 2008;55(2):21223. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03491.x

15 

MFujisawa, YShima, NHiguchi, TNakano, YKoyama, TKasumi, et al. Direct targets of the tomato-ripening regulator RIN identified by transcriptome and chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses. Planta. 2012;235(6):110722. 10.1007/s00425-011-1561-2

16 

MFujisawa, TNakano, YShima, YIto. A large-scale identification of direct targets of the tomato MADS box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR reveals the regulation of fruit ripening. Plant Cell. 2013;25(2):37186. 10.1105/tpc.112.108118

17 

MFujisawa, YShima, HNakagawa, MKitagawa, JKimbara, TNakano, et al. Transcriptional Regulation of Fruit Ripening by Tomato FRUITFULL Homologs and Associated MADS Box Proteins. Plant Cell. 2014;26(1):89101. 10.1105/tpc.113.119453

18 

YShima, MKitagawa, MFujisawa, TNakano, HKato, JKimbara, et al. Tomato FRUITFULL homologues act in fruit ripening via forming MADS-box transcription factor complexes with RIN. Plant Mol Biol. 2013;82(4–5):42738. 10.1007/s11103-013-0071-y

19 

CMartel, JVrebalov, PTafelmeyer, JJGiovannoni. The tomato MADS-box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 2011;157(3):156879. 10.1104/pp.111.181107

20 

GQin, YWang, BCao, WWang, STian. Unraveling the regulatory network of the MADS box transcription factor RIN in fruit ripening. Plant J. 2012;70(2):24355. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04861.x

21 

SZhong, ZFei, YRChen, YZheng, MHuang, JVrebalov, et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(2):1549. 10.1038/nbt.2462

22 

YIto, ANishizawa-Yokoi, MEndo, MMikami, YShima, NNakamura, et al. Re-evaluation of the rin mutation and the role of RIN in the induction of tomato ripening. Nat Plants. 2017;3(11):86674. 10.1038/s41477-017-0041-5

23 

YIto, YSekiyama, HNakayama, ANishizawa-Yokoi, MEndo, YShima, et al. Allelic Mutations in the Ripening -Inhibitor Locus Generate Extensive Variation in Tomato Ripening. Plant Physiol. 2020;183(1):8095. 10.1104/pp.20.00020

24 

SLi, HXu, ZJu, DCao, HZhu, DFu, et al. The RIN-MC Fusion of MADS-Box Transcription Factors Has Transcriptional Activity and Modulates Expression of Many Ripening Genes. Plant Physiol. 2018;176(1):891909. 10.1104/pp.17.01449

25 

SLi, BZhu, JPirrello, CXu, BZhang, MBouzayen, et al. Roles of RIN and ethylene in tomato fruit ripening and ripening-associated traits. New Phytol. 2020;226(2):46075. 10.1111/nph.16362

26 

YIto, ANishizawa-Yokoi, MEndo, MMikami, SToki. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;467(1):7682. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.117

27 

PDFraser, EMEnfissi, JMHalket, MRTruesdale, DYu, CGerrish, et al. Manipulation of phytoene levels in tomato fruit: effects on isoprenoids, plastids, and intermediary metabolism. Plant Cell. 2007;19(10):3194211. 10.1105/tpc.106.049817

28 

KJLivak, TDSchmittgen. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):4028. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

29 

MExposito-Rodriguez, AABorges, ABorges-Perez, JAPerez. Selection of internal control genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR studies during tomato development process. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:131. 10.1186/1471-2229-8-131

30 

TNakano, JKimbara, MFujisawa, MKitagawa, NIhashi, HMaeda, et al. MACROCALYX and JOINTLESS interact in the transcriptional regulation of tomato fruit abscission zone development. Plant Physiol. 2012;158(1):43950. 10.1104/pp.111.183731

31 

MBemer, RKarlova, ARBallester, YMTikunov, AGBovy, MWolters-Arts, et al. The tomato FRUITFULL homologs TDR4/FUL1 and MBP7/FUL2 regulate ethylene-independent aspects of fruit ripening. Plant Cell. 2012;24(11):443751. 10.1105/tpc.112.103283

32 

SWang, GLu, ZHou, ZLuo, TWang, HLi, et al. Members of the tomato FRUITFULL MADS-box family regulate style abscission and fruit ripening. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(12):300514. 10.1093/jxb/eru137

33 

YShima, MFujisawa, MKitagawa, TNakano, JKimbara, NNakamura, et al. Tomato FRUITFULL homologs regulate fruit ripening via ethylene biosynthesis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2014;78(2):2317. 10.1080/09168451.2014.878221

34 

CSmith, CWatson, JRay, CBird, PMorris, WSchuch, et al. Antisense RNA inhibition of polygalacturonase gene expression in transgenic tomatoes. Nature. 1988;334(6184):724.

35 

SUluisik, NHChapman, RSmith, MPoole, GAdams, RBGillis, et al. Genetic improvement of tomato by targeted control of fruit softening. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(9):9502. 10.1038/nbt.3602

36 

LYang, WHuang, FXiong, ZXian, DSu, MRen, et al. Silencing of SlPL, which encodes a pectate lyase in tomato, confers enhanced fruit firmness, prolonged shelf-life and reduced susceptibility to grey mould. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(12):154455. 10.1111/pbi.12737

37 

GGiorio, ALStigliani, CD’Ambrosio. Phytoene synthase genes in tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.)—new data on the structures, the deduced amino acid sequences and the expression patterns. FEBS J. 2008;275(3):52735. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06219.x

38 

CSBarry, MILlop-Tous, DGrierson. The regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase gene expression during the transition from system-1 to system-2 ethylene synthesis in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2000;123(3):97986. 10.1104/pp.123.3.979

39 

ANakatsuka, SMurachi, HOkunishi, SShiomi, RNakano, YKubo, et al. Differential expression and internal feedback regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase, and ethylene receptor genes in tomato fruit during development and ripening. Plant Physiol. 1998;118(4):1295305. 10.1104/pp.118.4.1295

40 

AJThompson, MTor, CSBarry, JVrebalov, COrfila, MCJarvis, et al. Molecular and genetic characterization of a novel pleiotropic tomato-ripening mutant. Plant Physiol. 1999;120(2):38390. 10.1104/pp.120.2.383

41 

DWang, THYeats, SUluisik, JKCRose, GBSeymour. Fruit Softening: Revisiting the Role of Pectin. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23(4):30210. 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.01.006

42 

TDPhan, WBo, GWest, GWLycett, GATucker. Silencing of the major salt-dependent isoform of pectinesterase in tomato alters fruit softening. Plant Physiol. 2007;144(4):19607. 10.1104/pp.107.096347

43 

DLSmith, JAAbbott, KCGross. Down-regulation of tomato beta-galactosidase 4 results in decreased fruit softening. Plant Physiol. 2002;129(4):175562. 10.1104/pp.011025

44 

DABrummell, MHHarpster, PMCivello, JMPalys, ABBennett, PDunsmuir. Modification of expansin protein abundance in tomato fruit alters softening and cell wall polymer metabolism during ripening. Plant Cell. 1999;11(11):220316. 10.1105/tpc.11.11.2203

45 

DMTieman, AKHanda. Reduction in Pectin Methylesterase Activity Modifies Tissue Integrity and Cation Levels in Ripening Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Fruits. Plant Physiol. 1994;106(2):42936. 10.1104/pp.106.2.429

46 

RESheehy, MKramer, WRHiatt. Reduction of polygalacturonase activity in tomato fruit by antisense RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(23):88059. 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8805

47 

CJSmith, CFWatson, PCMorris, CRBird, GBSeymour, JEGray, et al. Inheritance and effect on ripening of antisense polygalacturonase genes in transgenic tomatoes. Plant Mol Biol. 1990;14(3):36979. 10.1007/BF00028773

48 

JJGiovannoni, DDellaPenna, ABBennett, RLFischer. Expression of a chimeric polygalacturonase gene in transgenic rin (ripening inhibitor) tomato fruit results in polyuronide degradation but not fruit softening. Plant Cell. 1989;1(1):5363. 10.1105/tpc.1.1.53

49 

MTatsuki, HMori. Phosphorylation of tomato 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase, LE-ACS2, at the C-terminal region. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(30):280517. 10.1074/jbc.M101543200

50 

YKamiyoshihara, MIwata, TFukaya, MTatsuki, HMori. Turnover of LeACS2, a wound-inducible 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase in tomato, is regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation. Plant J. 2010;64(1):14050. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04316.x

51 

YSitrit, ABBennett. Regulation of tomato fruit polygalacturonase mRNA accumulation by ethylene: A Re-examination. Plant Physiol. 1998;116(3):114550. 10.1104/pp.116.3.1145

52 

SLi, KChen, DGrierson. A critical evaluation of the role of ethylene and MADS transcription factors in the network controlling fleshy fruit ripening. New Phytol. 2019;221(4):172441. 10.1111/nph.15545

53 

GRonen, LCarmel-Goren, DZamir, JHirschberg. An alternative pathway to beta -carotene formation in plant chromoplasts discovered by map-based cloning of beta and old-gold color mutations in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(20):111027. 10.1073/pnas.190177497