Introduction

Child malnutrition which includes both undernutrition and overweight are global challenges which is associated with an increased risk of mortality and morbidity, unhealthy development, and loss of productivity [1]. In 2016, nearly 155 million children under five years of age were reported stunted, while 41 million were obese or overweight [2]. Stunting and obesity distinctively pose a significant challenge to the health system, child survival and poor academic performance and a lower quality of life experience of children [3, 4] and their concurrence represents a serious public health challenge [5]. Though the drivers of these two forms of malnutrition appear distinct, new evidence indicates that there are shared biological, environmental and socioeconomic factors that contribute to the risk or prevalence of both [5, 6].

Although improvement of child undernutrition in Ethiopia has been achieved, stunting remains an important problem in Ethiopia, with 38% of children under five years of age affected. However, economic growth and urbanization in countries like Ethiopia have given rise to a nutrition transition, where there is a shift from traditional diets to “western diets” (energy-dense diets)which has led to an increase in overweight and obesity [7]. In Ethiopia, in addition to high levels of undernutrition, considerable levels of overweight/obesity have been observed. A recent metanalysis has shown a pooled prevalence of overweight and obesity of children and adolescents in Ethiopia to be 11.3% [8] and others reports showed a prevalence of overweight/obesity among preschoolers to be 13.8% in Gondar [9] and 7.3% in Hawassa [10]. On the other hand, undernutrition decreased but has not been as rapid as the rise in overweight and obesity, leading to a double burden of overnutrition and undernutrition [11].

Co-existence of two different forms of malnutrition is known as the double burden of malnutrition and could occur at country, household, or individual level [5]. At household level at least one member is undernourished and at least one member is overweight whereas at individual level the double burden of malnutrition often manifests as stunting or micronutrient deficiencies cooccurring with overweight or obesity [11–13]. At individual level, history of stunting coupled with consumption of high dense energy foods and micronutrient deficiencies owing to shared underlying determinants or physiologic links may also result in clustering of nutrition problems such as concurrence of stunting and overweight particularly among children under five years of age [11].

In that regard, the definition on the indicators used to explore and define the double burden of malnutrition phenomenon particularly at individual level stills remains unclear [14]. In other words, there is no uniform definition of double burden indicators. Indicators of child malnutrition used by the reviewed literatures are combination of height for age-z score (HAZ) and micronutrient deficiency [15], BMI for age-z-score and HAZ [16], weight for height z-score(WHZ) and HAZ [11, 17] and weight for age z-score (WAZ) and HAZ [18]. These differences in measurement, make comparison among studies difficult.

Children who are concurrently stunted and overweight/obese can be at greater risk of unhealthy development than normal children. In other words they are at high risk of non-communicable disease since they impose a high metabolic load on a depleted capacity for homoeostasis [19]. Further, concurrent under and over nutrition is a public health challenge in a sense there is a need to strike a delicate balance between reducing undernutrition and preventing over nutrition [13].

There are substantial studies on double burden of malnutrition and mainly focused on prevalence and trends of double burden at different levels [7, 11–13, 15–18, 20–41] but few studies investigated factors associated with the double burden at individual level and in particular among children under five years of age [16, 26, 30, 33, 36].

In East Africa, studies on cooccurrence of stunting and overweight/obesity are few [40, 41] focused on prevalence and did not explore factors associated with it particularly among children under five years of age. In Ethiopia, no studies have been found that examined double burden of malnutrition among children under five years of age. The previous studies in Ethiopia focused on inclusive measure of child undernutrition and failed to capture the severity of malnutrition for some children who suffer from more than one type of malnutrition. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of concurrence of stunting and overweight/obese among children under five years age in Ethiopia and associated factors.

Study subjects and methods

Study subjects

The available sample for children under five years of age was 10, 641, of the 10,641 children, we excluded from the analysis children with missing household data (n = 1170), children not alive at time of data collection (n = 635) and flagged cases (n = 122). The final data set comprised 8,714 children under five years of age (Fig 1).

Fig 1

Flow chart of sample selection.

Assessment of associated factors

Maternal education, place of residence (urban and rural), household wealth, regions (agrarian and pastoralists), child’s sex and age, latrine type, water source, birth size, history of infection and deworming, were factors included in the analysis. A detailed description these factors is presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Description of variables.

Sn	Variables	Description
1	Concurrent of stunting and overweight/obesity (CSO)	Defined when a child was both stunted and overweight/obese.
	Basic factors
2	Residence	Categorized as urban and rural.
3	Household wealth category	Categorized as low, middle and high wealth categories
4	Caregiver education	Categorized as illiterate/none, primary, and secondary and above
5	Region	Categorized as mainly pastoral and mainly agrarian. Regions categorized under agrarian are Amhara, Tigray, SNNP, Benishangul, Gambela, Addis Ababa, Harari and Diredawa. Regions that classified under pastoralist are Somali and Afar.
	Underlying factors
6	Water source	Categorized as improved and unimproved water source.
7	Toilet facility	Categorized as improved and unimproved toilet facility.
8	Immediate factors
9	Child sex	Categorized as boy and girl.
10	Child age	Categorized into <12,12–23, 24–35, 36–47 and 48–59
11	Birth size	Categorized as large, average and small.
12	History of infection	Categorized as yes and no.
13	Deworming tablet use	Categorized as yes and no.
14	Iron supplement use	Categorized as yes and no.

Result

Background characteristics of children

The background characteristics of children and prevalence of CSO across different covariates are presented in Table 2. Fifty eight percent of children were male and the rest were female. Thirty one percent of children were younger than twelve months and the rest were older than twelve months. Majority of children lived in rural and agrarian regions.

Table 2

Bivariate analysis of the relation of basic, underlying, and immediate factors with CSO.

		Weighted frequency (%)	CSO prevalence (95% CI)	P-value*
Basic factors (distal)
Residence place	Urban	12.7	2.50 (0.1, 4.5)	0.64
	Rural	87.3	1.74(1.34, 2.26)
Wealth	Low	43.6	0.87(0.57, 1.33)	0.24
	Middle	16.0	0.32 (0.2, 0.52)
	High	40.4	0.8(0.58, 1.12)
Caregiver education	No	62.5	1.25(0.93, 1.67)	0.2
	Primary	33.6	0.67(0.45, 0.95)
	Secondary+	3.9	0.08[0.02 0.28]
Region	Agrarian	97.1	1.93(1.51,2.47)	0.02
	Pastoral	2.9	0.06(0.03,0.10)
Underlying factors (intermediate)
Water source type	Not improved	43.3	0.86(0.59, 1.26)	0.91
	Improved	56.7	1.13(0.84, 1.52)
Toilet facility source	Not improved	93.8	1.87(1.45, 2.41)	0.22
	Improved	6.2	0.12(0.06, 0.25)
Immediate factors (proximal)
Child sex	Boy	57.9	1.15(0.86, 1.54)	0.18
	Girl	42.1	0.84(0.6, 1.18)
Child age	<12 months	31.1	0.62(0.43,0.88)	0.01
	12–23	20.5	0.44(0.25,0.66)
	24–35	18.9	0.38(0.23,0.60)
	36–47	20.6	0.18(0.09,0.34)
	48–59	8.9
Birth size	Large	38.9	0.77(0.54, 1.11)	0.1
	Average	43.7	0.87(0.63, 1.20)
	Small	17.4	0.35(0.22, 0.56)
Infection history	No	85.9	1.71(1.32,2.21)	0.009
	Yes	14.1	0.28(0.17, 0.47)
Deworming	No	94.2	1.88(1.47, 2.40)	0.122
	Yes	5.8	0.11(0.04, 0.30)
Iron supplement	No	90.1	1.79(1.38, 2.32)	0.58
	Yes	9.9	0.2(0.1, 0.39)

CSO: Concurrent of stunting and overweight/obesity CI: confidence interval. *Based on Pearson chi-square test of association.

Determinants of stunting

Table 3 shows determinants of stunting and obesity. The first, second, and third models contained basic, underlying, and immediate factors, respectively. Model-1 adjusted for basic factors only, Model-2 adjusted for basic factors and underlying factors and Model-3 adjusted for basic factors and immediate factors.

Table 3

Hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis to determine basic, underlying and immediate determinants of stunting among children under five years of age.

Variables		Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
		COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)	COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)	COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)
Residence	Urban	Ref
	Rural	2.06(1.82–2.34)	1.12(0.95–1.34)
Wealth	Low	1.89(1.70–2.09)	1.57(1.37–1.79) **
	Middle	1.58(1.37–1.82)	1.18(1 .00–1.38) *
	High	Ref	Ref
Caregiver education	No	4.23(3.00–5.95)	3.14(2.18–4.51) **
	Primary	3.26(2.29–4.62)	2.52(1.75–3.62) **
	Secondary+	Ref	Ref
Region	Agrarian	1.13(1.02–1.26)	1.46(1.30–1.64) **
	Pastoralist
Water source type	Not improved			1.14(1.04–1.25)	0.91(0.83–1.01)
	Improved			Ref	Ref
Toilet facility type	Not improved			2.21(1.94–2.53)	1.41(1.18–1.68) **
	Improved			Ref	Ref
Child sex	Girl					Ref
	Boy					1.14(1.04–1.24)	1.20(1.09–1.32) **
Child age	<12 months					Ref
	12–23					3.68(3.12–4.33)	3.76(3.16–4.49) **
	24–35					5.70(4.83–6.71)	6.03(5.06–7.18) **
	36–47					5.13(4.36–6.05)	5.43(4.56–6.47) **
	48–59					3.82(3.24–4.50)	4.02(3.37–4.78) **
Birth size	Large					Ref	Ref
	Average					1.22(1.10–1.36)	1.25(1.12–1.41) **
	Small					1.59(1.42–1.79)	1.73(1.52–1.97) **
Infection history	No					Ref	-
	Yes					1.08(0.98–1.20)	-
Deworming	No					0.94(0.83–1.08	-
	Yes					Ref	-
Iron supplement	No					0.93(0.79–1.10)	-
	Yes					Ref	-

COR: Crude Odds Ratio; AOR: Adjusted odds ratio CI: Confidence interval *P-value significant when <0.05 ** P-value significant when <0.001.

Model-1: adjusted for residence place and wealth category.

Model-2: adjusted for residence place, wealth category and all variables under Model-2 .

Model-3: adjusted for residence place, wealth category and all variables under Model-3.

Determinants of stunting included lowest wealth index category (AOR = 1.57), children whom caregivers had no education (AOR = 3.14), not having improved toilet facility (AOR = 1.41), being a male child (AOR = 1.20), being at age group 24–35 (AOR = 6.03) and having been small at birth (AOR = 1.73).

Determinants of overweight/obesity

Table 4 shows determinants of overweight/obesity. The first, second, and third models contained basic, underlying, and immediate factors, respectively. Model-1 adjusted for basic factors only, Model-2 adjusted for basic factors and underlying factors and Model-3 adjusted for basic factors and immediate factors.

Table 4

Hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis to determine basic, underlying and immediate determinants of overweight/obesity among children under five years of age.

Variables		Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
		COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)	COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)	COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)
Residence	Urban	1.78(1.38–2.30)	1.35(0.91–2.00)
	Rural	Ref	Ref
Wealth	Low	Ref	Ref
	Middle	1.00(0.69–1.45)	0.87(0.65–1.18)
	High	1.63(1.27–2.07)	1.44(0.64–2.05)
Caregiver education	No	Ref	Ref
	Primary	1.04(0.79–1.39)	0.77(0.51–1.16)
	Secondary+	1.91(1.14–3.19)	1.26(0.91–1.75)
Region	Agrarian	1.48(1.09–2.01)	1.51(1.08–2.11) *
	Pastoralist	Ref
Water source type	Not improved			1.06(0.84–1.34)	-
	Improved			Ref	-
Toilet facility type	Not improved			Ref
	Improved			1.60(1.22–2.10)	1.14(0.76–1.71)
Child sex	Girl					Ref	Ref
	Boy					1.25(1.00–1.58)	1.25(0.98–1.61)
Child age	<12 months					Ref	Ref
	12–23					3.41(2.24–5.19)	3.74(2.39–5.85) **
	24–35					2.62(1.70–4.05)	2.67(1.67–4.25) **
	36–47					1.86(1.17–2.95)	1.81(1.10–2.99) *
	48–59					2.06(1.28–3.18)	2.01(1.24–3.27) *
Birth size	Large					Ref
	Average					1.25(0.92–1.71)	-
	Small					1.21(0.90–1.62)	-
Infection history	No					1.72(1.28–2.33)	1.83(1.33–2.53) **
	Yes					Ref	Ref
Deworming	No					1.58(1.04–2.39)	1.49(0.93–2.39)
	Yes					Ref	Ref
Iron supplement	No					Ref	-
	Yes					1.08(0.71–1.65)	-

COR: Crude Odds Ratio; AOR: Adjusted odds ratio CI: Confidence interval *P-value significant when <0.05 ** P-value significant when <0.001.

Model-1: adjusted for residence place and wealth category.

Model-2: adjusted for residence place, wealth category and all variables under Model-2.

Model-3: adjusted for residence place, wealth category and all variables under Model-3.

Determinants of obesity included living in agrarian region (AOR = 1.51), being younger than 12 months (AOR = 3.74) and not having history of infection (AOR = 1.83).

Determinants of CSO

The multiple hierarchical logistic regression model is presented in Table 5. The first, second, and third models contained basic, underlying, and immediate factors, respectively. Model-1 adjusted for basic factors only, Model-2 adjusted for basic factors and underlying factors and Model-3 adjusted for basic factors and immediate factors. The determinants of CSO included living in agrarian region (AOR = 1.51), not having improved toilet facility (AOR = 1.94), being younger than 12 months (AOR = 4.22), not having history of infection (AOR = 1.83) and not having taken deworming tablet within the previous six months (AOR = 1.49).

Table 5

Hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis to determine basic, underlying and immediate determinants of CSO.

Variable		Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
		COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)	COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)	COR (95% CI)	AOR (95% CI)
Residence	Urban	0.88(0.58–1.36)	1.09(0.62–1.93)
	Rural	Ref	Ref
Wealth index	Low	Ref	Ref
	Middle	1.11 (0.69–1.79)	0.76(0.44–1.31)
	High	1.10(0.77–1.58)	1.07(0.68–1.68)
Caregiver education	No	1.17(0.80–1.70)	1.03(0.70–1.53)
	Primary	0.95(0.39–2.36)	0.74(0.27–1.99)
	Secondary +	Ref	Ref
Region	Agrarian	1.57(1.02–2.42)	1.51(1.08–2.11) *
	Pastoralist	Ref	Ref
Water source type	Not improved			1.05(0.76–1.46)	-
	Improved			Ref	-
Toilet facility type	Not improved			1.62(0.98–2.70)	1.94(0.74–4.91) *
	Improved			Ref	Ref
Child sex	Girl					Ref	Ref
	Boy					1.23(0.89–1.70)	1.22(0.87–1.72)
Child age	<12 months					4.47(2.37–8.42)	4.22(2.22–8.05) **
	12–23					2.65(1.35–5.20)	2.49(1.24–5.00) *
	24–35					2.40(1.21–4.77)	2.54(1.27–5.08) *
	36–47					2.99(1.54–5.80)	3.00(1.54–5.84) *
	48–59					Ref	Ref
Birth size	Large					Ref	Ref
	Average					1.02(0.66–1.57)	-
	Small					1.05(0.70–1.57)	-
Infection history	No					1.88(1.20–2.94)	1.98(1.25–3.15) *
	Yes					Ref	Ref
Deworming	No					2.39(1.17–4.89)	2.32(1.07–5.01) *
	Yes					Ref	Ref
Iron supplement	No					0.80(0.45–1.42)	-
	Yes					Ref	-

COR: Crude Odds Ratio; AOR: Adjusted odds ratio CI: Confidence interval *P-value significant when <0.05 ** P-value significant when <0.001.

Model-1: adjusted for residence place and wealth category.

Model-2: adjusted for residence place, wealth category and all variables under Model-2.

Model-3: adjusted for residence place, wealth category and all variables under Model-3.

Discussion

To our best of knowledge, this is a first study to show prevalence of CSO and its associated factors using a national representative sample of children under five years of age in Ethiopia. Our study provided evidence that there was concurrence of stunting and overweight among children under five years of age in Ethiopia. We also found CSO is associated with factors at different levels. The basic factor associated with higher odds of CSO was being from agrarian region. The underlying factor associated with CSO was not having improved toilet facility. The immediate factors found associated with higher odds of CSO were age younger than 12 months, no history of infection and not having received deworming for the last six months.

Our results showed high level of stunting among children under five years of age, with 38.3% of children being stunted. Overweight was also prevalent, though not as high as stunting. We found an overall prevalence of overweight/obesity was higher compared to estimates based on weight for height z-score. This finding is in agreement with a study that compared changes in the prevalence of overweight in preschool children between 1990 and 2010 and found that estimates using BMI z-score were higher than those observed using WHZ [49].

The prevalence of children concurrently suffered stunting and overweight/obese was 1.99%. In comparison to other studies on prevalence of concurrence of stunting and overweight/obese among children under five years of age in African countries, the prevalence in our study was higher than studies conducted in Ghana and Kenya [16, 40] but lower than a study conducted in South Africa and Libya that reported prevalence of 18% and 7% respectively among children under five years of age [28, 38]. Similarly, when compared to studies from Asia and Latin America countries that determined the prevalence of concurrence of stunting and overweight/obese among children under five years of age, our study was lower than a study conducted Ecuador that reported a prevalence of 2.8% [23], but higher than a study from Mexico that reported a prevalence of 1% [17] and lower than a prevalence from China that reported 5.06% [33]. A recent study that examined the double burden of malnutrition among children aged 6–59 months in the Middle-East and North Africa (MENA) and Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) regions also showed a prevalence that ranged from 0.4 to 10.7% in MENA regions and 0.3 to 1.9% in LAC regions [50]. The prevalence of our study is lower than prevalence of almost all LAC regions and within the range in most countries in MENA regions.

Our findings regarding factors associated with stunting, overweight/obesity and CSO are noteworthy. Children from agrarian region were more likely to be stunted, overweight/obese and concurrently stunted and overweight/obese. The finding was consistent with reports of previous studies in Ethiopia that showed higher prevalence of stunting in Amhara and Tigray, both Agrarian regions but lower stunting prevalence in Somali and Afar, both Pastoralist regions [42, 51]. This could be explained by the fact that short maternal stature is common in agrarian region [42, 51] than in pastoralists and thus intergenerational influence on height of their children since shorter parents are more likely to have shorter children [52]. Further, genetics and environmental factors are known to influence child’s height [53, 54]. Another possible explanation could be due to difference in dietary practices. Pastoralists communities in Ethiopia are more likely to consume milk than agrarian communities. Animal source foods are rich in type I and particularly type II nutrients (the growth nutrients) nutrients and has shown to reduce risk of stunting in children [55, 56]. This is even evident in our sub-sample data; sub-sample analysis of data of current work for children aged 6–23 months using Pearson chi-squared test revealed that almost 62% of children from pastoralist communities consumed dairy products. Conversely, only 15% of children from agrarian communities consumed dairy products (P<0.001). Similarly, children residing in agrarian regions had higher odds of being overweight/obesity than their counter parts in pastoralist regions. This finding is similar to other studies conducted in Ethiopia that found higher prevalence of overweight/obesity among children residing in agrarian regions [9, 10]. This again could be explained by differences in lifestyle, diet or in feeding habits across regions. Studies conducted in agrarian regions found consumption of sweet food [9, 10] and early introduction of formula milk were among factors associated with overweight/obesity among preschoolers [10].

Children from poor households were more likely to be stunted than those from rich household. This could be due to the fact that infant and young child caring practices like hygiene, proper feeding and health services utilization are often poorly practiced among poor households compared to their richer counterparts [52, 57, 58]. This finding also agrees with the existing literature on stunting [16, 36]. Children from rural areas and whose mothers have not received formal education had also a higher risk of being stunted but not overweight/obese or CSO. Education and place residence are socio-economic indicators. Poverty and a lack of educational attainment is associated with poor nutrition and health practices such as poor nutrition across the life course due to inability to afford nutrient-rich foods [59].

Children from households with unimproved toilet facilities had higher odds of stunting and concurrently suffering from both stunting and overweight/obsess than children dwelling in households with improved toilet facilities. Access to improved sanitation services is crucial for preventing undernutrition since poor sanitation can result in childhood infection such as diarrhea which subsequently affect the linear growth of a child negatively [60, 61].

We also found higher odds of stunting in boys and those children above 12 months of age which is consistent with other studies [57, 62]. This could be due to the rampant suboptimal feeding practices in Ethiopia and high number of children are not meeting the minimum acceptable diet [42]. Conversely, higher odds of overweight and CSO was found in children younger than 12 months of age which is in agreement with studies conducted in Ethiopia [63], Cameroon [64] and Malaysia [65]. After literature search, previous studies did not investigate association between overweight/obesity and different age groups and as why younger children are at higher risk of overweight/obese. Though one study related to increase of physical activity as the age increase which will lead to high metabolic activity and energy requirement [63]. Feeding pattern among these particular age group is one of the factors that might need to be explored to better understand such association.

Further, our finding of higher risks of stunting in boys than in girls was in agreement with previous reports which demonstrated higher odds of stunting in boys [52, 66]. This finding suggests that boys are generally vulnerable to malnutrition and could be a biological explanation. Epidemiological and cohort studies on neonatology demonstrated consistently higher morbidity and mortality in males than in early life [67–70] though the underlying mechanisms is poorly understood [70, 71].

Small birth size was also significantly associated with stunting. This finding was also in agreement with the existing evidence which suggests low birthweight linked to poor health and nutritional outcomes [1, 62, 72]. Fetal growth restriction is an important contributor to stunting in children and evidence showed that low birthweight was associated with 2.5–3.5-fold higher odds of wasting, stunting and underweight [72]. Further, other evidences have suggested low birth weight babies who exhibit catchup growth may be at risk of abnormal weight gain in childhood [73–77].

Deworming and not having history of infection were associated with CSO while not having history of infection was associated with overweight/obese. This could be possibly due to the fact that helminths and protozoans trigger leptin secretion which is related to inflammation, food intake and nutrient absorption and metabolism [78]. There is also evidence that all forms of chronic gut inflammation lead to growth faltering, whether indirectly by affecting nutrient balance or by more direct effects on metabolism [79].

The first 1,000 days is a critical time for physical and intellectual growth and set a foundation for long term heath and development [1]. As a result of greater awareness of significance of stunting as one of major public health problems, stunting reduction has gained increased international attention [80]. Equally, overweight/obesity in this age group deserves attention because at early stage of life catch up growth have been identified as one of the risk factors that lead to progression of abnormal weight gain [81–87]. Therefore, it is important to identify children that are at risk of developing CSO as early as possible to limit progression of both growth flattering and abnormal weight gain. Further, evidence have shown that if only under nutrition is targeted with an aim of targeting growth may unintentionally contribute to abnormal weight gain [88]. In this regard, humanitarian emergency nutrition programs that are currently focused mainly on food security can be used as platform to promote quality and nutritious diets and ensure that the food provided does not increase the risk of unhealthy diets which may unintentionally contribute to abnormal weight gains [5].

A recent analysis conducted by WHO has also showed that policies that address undernutrition often times do not include overweight/obesity and the vice versa [59]. Thus, integrated interventions, programs and policies that have the potential to improve the nutrition outcomes across the spectrum of malnutrition is of paramount importance to simultaneously reduce the risk or burden of both undernutrition and overweight/obesity [5].

Our study has the following limitations; first, recall bias while reporting the birth, infection, dietary history of children is still an issue of concern [89]. In other words, collecting data like birth size and history of infection are solely based on memory of mothers or the caretaker which might have led to recall bias. Further, due to the cross-sectional nature of this study a cause and effect relationship could not be inferred.

Given the above-mentioned limitations, the current work has some strengths. First, the EDHS data is a national representative data and conclusions about Ethiopia can be drawn. Second the data is reliable and of high quality since the standardized procedures are employed by such kind of survey. Third, appropriate statistical method was used to explore the relationships between the outcome variable and its determinants.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study provided evidence on the co-existence of stunting and overweight/obesity among children under five years of age in Ethiopia. CSO was associated with various factors originating from community and child levels. Therefore, identifying children at risk of growth flattering and excess weight gain provides nutrition policies and programs in Ethiopia and beyond with an opportunity of earlier interventions through improving sanitation, dietary quality by targeting children under five years of age and those living in Agrarian regions of Ethiopia.