Author Correction: Genome-wide association study of depression phenotypes in UK Biobank identifies variants in excitatory synaptic pathways

Nature Communications

Home Author Correction: Genome-wide association study of depression phenotypes in UK Biobank identifies variants in excitatory synaptic pathways

David M. Howard, Mark J. Adams, Masoud Shirali, Toni-Kim Clarke, Riccardo E. Marioni, Gail Davies, Jonathan R. I. Coleman, Clara Alloza, Xueyi Shen, Miruna C. Barbu, Eleanor M. Wigmore, Jude Gibson, Michelle Agee, Babak Alipanahi, Adam Auton,

... See all authors

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22411-w, Volume: 12

Article Type: Correction Article History

Publisher: Nature Publishing Group UK

Altmetric

Table of Contents

Howard,Adams,Shirali,Clarke,Marioni,Davies,Coleman,Alloza,Shen,Barbu,Wigmore,Gibson,23andMe Research TeamAgeeMichelle11AlipanahiBabak11AutonAdam11BellRobert K.11BrycKatarzyna11ElsonSarah L.11FontanillasPierre11FurlotteNicholas A.11HindsDavid A.11HuberKaren E.11KleinmanAaron11LittermanNadia K.11McCreightJennifer C.11McIntyreMatthew H.11MountainJoanna L.11NoblinElizabeth S.11NorthoverCarrie A. M.11PittsSteven J.11SathirapongsasutiJ. Fah11SazonovaOlga V.11SheltonJanie F.11ShringarpureSuyash11TianChao11TungJoyce Y.11VacicVladimir11WilsonCatherine H.11,Hagenaars,Lewis,Ward,Smith,Sullivan,Haley,Breen,Deary,and McIntosh: Author Correction: Genome-wide association study of depression phenotypes in UK Biobank identifies variants in excitatory synaptic pathways

Correction to: Nature Communications 10.1038/s41467-018-03819-3, published online 16 April 2018.

The original version of this Article contained an error in the ‘Methods’ subsection entitled ‘Broad depression phenotype’, which incorrectly read ‘“Have you ever seen a psychiatrist for nerves, anxiety, tension or depression”? (UK Biobank field 2010)’. The same error was made three times in the subsections ‘Probable MDD phenotype’ and ‘ICD-coded MDD phenotype’, which read ‘(UK Biobank fields: 2090 and 2010)’. The correct version states ‘2100’ in place of ‘2010’ in each case. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.